They don't give one little shit. Cellphones, and seeding, probably a few other lesser reasons are the exact reason we're seeing a huge decline in insects and birds. But we need it to beat climate change, right.
Since cellphones, look at the decline caused on our environment. A few decades. No rejuvenation efforts working. It ain't pesticides, they were there for longer. It is what specifically affecting them. Read those headlines. It is the cellphone. That rate of decline has sped up astronomically. Since the cellphone. There is as much supporting evidence as your links of cancers and brain disease.
No, we need more consumption to kick-start productivity to get out of the debt driven economies reliant on the next means of profit.
Good question perhaps the worst effects have work arounds- using hardwired connections or posting your residence sufficiently far from high intensity broadcasts.
They don't. It fucks up their senses. Wrecks their migratory patterns. Wrecks their navigation. Their internal natural alignment
It has fried their brains.
Where are they since cellphones? Rapidly declining to the point of.
Literal twilight zone. All those flowers the same flowers decreasing two decades ago would see them lilac lavender which would be crawling with them. Have none or so few it's a huge problem.
It isn't pesticides I asked my neighbour with these pollen rich flowers, are you using. No they assured me.
So where, what like the climate change. No. Temperature has increased yes. But not to the point, you leave your windows open in that heat. Nothing except a garden spider.
It's far far worse. So the UK went on a huge rewilding effort, huge, put out bug beds in meadows it wanted to create for them. These would have seen an abundance of activity all of a few decades ago. Non existently declining, to the point of they made no difference or hadn't caused any increase.
It isn't pesticides the dumbest excuse. It's cellphones. The two are directly linked. There's also light pollution. LED lights are very bad compared to the older lamp- posts. Things like seeding as well.
But it's specifically the signals and cancer masks from cellphones. That evidence is undeniable. It's what the EV uses and often renewables.
These fucks don't care about anything except profit and little stupid names in history. Every single one of them has gone full blown retard. Take immigration. At what point is growing a population in its extremes and populating it in another climate going to prevent climate change? It isn't. Now you're changing the entire climate dramatically. It isn't sustainable. It isn't sustainable using electronics lasting a 5 year average. But guys here's the EV. It had nothing to do with anything except full blown retards where every single time they speak today is lies. Profiting off hypocrisy, ignorance, and stupidity.
Second reply - put some more thought into this: I think it's part of a larger strategy of pervasive toxicity. 15 minute cities and designated zones where the people, instability, and toxicity is concentrated for maximum effect. The body has passive resistance to radiation in small doses. Push pass this limit and damage becomes accentuated.
5G also has a range of effects which aren't well documented (it is safe to assume). That's because only part of that spectrum is well studied. The previous spectrum which overlaps with 3G/4G.
Yes good point. The microwave band is likely more toxic given its shorter wavelengths and potential to resonate with additional ionic compounds such as calcium channels.
The previous band is between 700MhZ to 2.4Ghz. 5G will add more energy in those same bands and also add on frequencies up to 100Ghz (or beyond perhaps) potentially. Though different countries seem to be allocating different ranges. Some are proposing 20-40Ghz, others 50-60Ghz, etc.
And new routers now using 5Ghz, or 6Ghz in addition to the old 2.4. I don't think any of that has been carefully studied in the public domain. Though we know the military has studied the higher Ghz for weapons and likely the entire range of microwaves.
I notice you're consistently unable to find the sane information the rest of us can. Then you act shamefully about it. For this reason I'm no longer interested in helping you.
Src/https://childrenshealthdefense.org/electromagnetic-radiation-wireless/?itm_term=home
They've known it for much longer.
They don't give one little shit. Cellphones, and seeding, probably a few other lesser reasons are the exact reason we're seeing a huge decline in insects and birds. But we need it to beat climate change, right.
Since cellphones, look at the decline caused on our environment. A few decades. No rejuvenation efforts working. It ain't pesticides, they were there for longer. It is what specifically affecting them. Read those headlines. It is the cellphone. That rate of decline has sped up astronomically. Since the cellphone. There is as much supporting evidence as your links of cancers and brain disease.
No, we need more consumption to kick-start productivity to get out of the debt driven economies reliant on the next means of profit.
At this rate, it doesn't matter. One little bit.
How do "they" protect themselves from it then?
Good question perhaps the worst effects have work arounds- using hardwired connections or posting your residence sufficiently far from high intensity broadcasts.
They don't. It fucks up their senses. Wrecks their migratory patterns. Wrecks their navigation. Their internal natural alignment It has fried their brains.
Where are they since cellphones? Rapidly declining to the point of.
Literal twilight zone. All those flowers the same flowers decreasing two decades ago would see them lilac lavender which would be crawling with them. Have none or so few it's a huge problem.
It isn't pesticides I asked my neighbour with these pollen rich flowers, are you using. No they assured me.
So where, what like the climate change. No. Temperature has increased yes. But not to the point, you leave your windows open in that heat. Nothing except a garden spider.
It's far far worse. So the UK went on a huge rewilding effort, huge, put out bug beds in meadows it wanted to create for them. These would have seen an abundance of activity all of a few decades ago. Non existently declining, to the point of they made no difference or hadn't caused any increase.
It isn't pesticides the dumbest excuse. It's cellphones. The two are directly linked. There's also light pollution. LED lights are very bad compared to the older lamp- posts. Things like seeding as well.
But it's specifically the signals and cancer masks from cellphones. That evidence is undeniable. It's what the EV uses and often renewables.
These fucks don't care about anything except profit and little stupid names in history. Every single one of them has gone full blown retard. Take immigration. At what point is growing a population in its extremes and populating it in another climate going to prevent climate change? It isn't. Now you're changing the entire climate dramatically. It isn't sustainable. It isn't sustainable using electronics lasting a 5 year average. But guys here's the EV. It had nothing to do with anything except full blown retards where every single time they speak today is lies. Profiting off hypocrisy, ignorance, and stupidity.
Second reply - put some more thought into this: I think it's part of a larger strategy of pervasive toxicity. 15 minute cities and designated zones where the people, instability, and toxicity is concentrated for maximum effect. The body has passive resistance to radiation in small doses. Push pass this limit and damage becomes accentuated.
5G also has a range of effects which aren't well documented (it is safe to assume). That's because only part of that spectrum is well studied. The previous spectrum which overlaps with 3G/4G.
Yes good point. The microwave band is likely more toxic given its shorter wavelengths and potential to resonate with additional ionic compounds such as calcium channels.
The previous band is between 700MhZ to 2.4Ghz. 5G will add more energy in those same bands and also add on frequencies up to 100Ghz (or beyond perhaps) potentially. Though different countries seem to be allocating different ranges. Some are proposing 20-40Ghz, others 50-60Ghz, etc.
And new routers now using 5Ghz, or 6Ghz in addition to the old 2.4. I don't think any of that has been carefully studied in the public domain. Though we know the military has studied the higher Ghz for weapons and likely the entire range of microwaves.
Put your router on an outlet timer.....so that at least at night when you're sleeping you're not being radiated......
Why don't you link tho the WHO/UN publication that "admits" what you claim?
Because those who make the claim should also provide the evidence.
In any argument.
Didn't you learn that in achool?
Not very good at digging up facts, are you?
The source material i linked covers the connection in the video- check it out of you're interested
I can not find anything by the UN or WHO stating that 5G has adverse health effects.
Why don't you simply link to their publication that says it?
I notice you're consistently unable to find the sane information the rest of us can. Then you act shamefully about it. For this reason I'm no longer interested in helping you.
It's not my job to find evidence for your claims.