Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

14
SELECTIVELY ENFORCED LAWS, Such As 18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or Parading - Enforced to Fullest Against Jan Six Protesters, Could Have Been Used To Prosecute Millions Of Democrat Protesters But Anti-Christ Jews Own Justice Department (media.scored.co)
posted 2 years ago by Vlad_The_Impaler 2 years ago by Vlad_The_Impaler +14 / -0
10 comments share
10 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (10)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler [S] 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Why was this law not enforced against protesters and Bret Kavanaugh hearing?

Why weren't the BLM and Antifa protesters outside Kyle Rittenhouse trial arrested for picketing and parading?

Why weren't the protesters at the George Floyd cop trial not arrested for trying to influence judge and jurors? The cop should file for mistrial because people were outside blatantly violating this law and the federal and state police did nothing to enforce the law.

I think that we can make a good case that we are not equal under the law. Jews get the most privilege. Goyim with Jewish lawyers get the second most privilege. Look how many times they let Epstein go, and the media such as CNBC (check my source) covering it up.

Prosecutors pick and choose when and if they want to enforce particular laws and against who. And that's just the first filter to how citizens are treated unequally. But you never hear "equal rights" advocates talk about this.

Then, once a prosecutor uses extreme prejudice who and who not to prosecute and hold to the law, you get a very subjective court trial with bias judges appointed by bias politicians, and juries that are extremely and illegally coached by those judges who are allowed to be tampered with and threatened by democrat protesters and corporate media shills.

Then the sentencing is BS. I remember during COVID that they selectively chose which criminals they wanted to just release from jail and prisons. They were just releasing guys. Not everyone. Selectively, of course.

Politicians commit crimes all the time and are never prosecuted. In fact, I don't even think a sitting member of congress can be charged with low level crimes at all until after they are out of office. Someone fact check me on that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

So, you're not a Christian, so why does it matter that Garland, the moron Jew in charge of the DOJ, is anti-Christian to you or not? You looking out for the rest of us? You're not even an American.

And the term you're looking for is "anarcho-tyranny"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler [S] 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

It is not Christian to let Jews run your justice system. They beared false witness against Jesus Christ in the most important trial in human history. They should be banned from holding any position of responsibility in a proper justice system.

What does it mean to be American?

One's best defense in such a scenario in a courtroom might be to prove to the jury that the enforcement of the law is arbitrary, selective, and with a large variation in how it is applied, charged, adjudicated and sentenced.

I believe we could find many other laws that are selectively enforced, such as "racketeering."

We should compile this evidence.

How could someone protesting OUTSIDE the capitol building be charged with parading while democrats were inside the courtroom screaming during Bret Kavanaugh's hearing? Or screaming and picketing and threatening in gathering outside courtroom where Officer Chauvin was convicted?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Your understanding of Christian theology is woeful.

You, a foreigner, should not be lecturing me, an American, about what it means to be an American, the same way I wouldn't lecture on how to be a citizen of X.

Where are you from, exactly, so I can tell you how to be a better citizen of that country?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

You avoided the question.

I do not pretend to be an expert. I ask you.

What does it mean to be American?

Why are you taking criticism of the selective enforcement of justice inside the United States so personal? I do not hold you personally liable for the long-term and sophisticated destruction of the American justice system. Why are you defensive and demanding my credentials? Do I need to be a journalist from CNN or have a history degree from a jew university or be a licensed sleezebag attorney to discuss these things?

Perhaps you ARE liable in some way, or you take criticism of your profession personal? Are you an attorney or work inside this justice system that I criticize?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

And you avoided my questions.

Tell me what country you're from, so we can compare and contrast our respective legal systems, or I'm going to ignore any further replies you do or do not make on this thread.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I have no national justice system I want to defend. Perhaps we can avoid criticism of USA justice system by arguing another nation's justice system is comparatively worse? This would not bring any peace of mind and is like saying we should not criticize republicans because arguably Democrats are worse.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Every time that democrats / jew media pretend to care about rape i think about all the times they let rapists go in more cases of double standards, selective enforcement of the law, fake outrage, unequal treatment under the law.

Democrat Shafeeq Sheikh only got probation for raping a woman. Democrats celebrated. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2018/08/19/a-jury-convicted-a-doctor-of-raping-a-patient-at-a-hospital-and-sentenced-him-to-probation/

When Benjamin Lawrence Petty, 36, tied up and raped a 13 year old girl, he only got probation! https://newsok.com/article/5581413/rapist-gets-probation-for-attack-on-13-year-old-at-baptist-church-camp-in-oklahoma

But Kavanaguh gyrated his hips at an unknown place at unknown time with no witnesses over 30 years ago!

When three Muslim boys from a nation (Shithole countries Iraq, other two from Eritrea) from which President Trump wanted to better vet immigrants took turns sexually assaulting a five year old white girl in a closet and then urinated on her, they only got probation!!! https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/northwest/article142759434.html

Jews and their Democrat/Republican shills want to bring in more fake refugees so refugee children can sexually assault 5 year old white girls and then urinate on them when they are done!

Democrats let the black gang rapists go with ......PROBATION! 2 Black men sentenced to probation for gang-rape of 13-year-old girl But wahhhh Bret Kavanaugh! http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/04/09/outrage-after-2-men-sentenced-to-probation-for-gang-rape-13-year-old.html

In 1975 Hillary Rodham Clinton represented an accused rapist named Thomas Alfred Taylor - a 41-year-old man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl named Kathy Shelton. "Though he faced 30 years to life in prison, Clinton negotiated a plea deal that sentenced him to just one year in county jail and four years of probation." https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-stands-by-her-defense-of-1975-rape-suspect/ Hillary Clinton called the 12 year old accuser a liar when she stated that she was "fantasizing" the rape and said "children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents with disorganized families, such as the complainant, are even more prone to such behavior."

All these women who cry about rape and MeToo feminism all voted for Hillary Clinton who defended a pedophile who raped a 12 year old girl named Kathy Shelton. Very few people in America have any credibility or behave consistently with what they claim they believe in.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT:

Between November 2022 and January 2023, approximately 25 to 30 classified government documents were discovered by President Joe Biden's attorneys in his former office at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, D.C. and in his personal residence in Wilmington, Delaware, dating to his time in the Senate and his vice presidency in the Obama administration. Biden's attorneys discovered the first set of classified documents in a locked closet at the Penn Biden Center on November 2, 2022, and reported them to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), which retrieved them the next day.

https://apnews.com/article/biden-politics-united-states-government-michael-pence-us-federal-bureau-of-investigation-9c2d7f472b8ff63f76f2c9fbb03dfde2

https://apnews.com/article/classified-documents-biden-home-wilmington-33479d12c7cf0a822adb2f44c32b88fd?utm_source=homepage&utm_medium=TopNews&utm_campaign=position_01

Classified documents at Pence’s home, too, his lawyer says https://apnews.com/article/mike-pence-classified-documents-791bba57abaf50377f0938f0d293f36e

The deep state (Garland and fellow jews) won't allow shill presidents and shill vice presidents to retain any classified documents from their own fucking administrations.

Why wasn't CNN present to film and broadcast the FBI searches in the residencies of Pence and Biden? The FBI seems to inform CNN of raids when it is Roger Stone or MaraLago.

Selective enforcement of the law

Unequal enforcement of the law.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Seattle’s hard-Left secessionist movement has claimed its first territory: six blocks in the Capitol Hill neighborhood. https://www.city-journal.org/article/anarchy-in-seattle

Then, in a stunning turn of events, the City of Seattle made the decision to abandon the East Precinct and surrender the neighborhood to the protesters. “This is an exercise in trust and de-escalation,” explained Chief Carmen Best. Officers and National Guardsmen emptied out the facility, boarded it up, and retreated. Immediately afterward, Black Lives Matter protesters, Antifa black shirts, and armed members of the hard-Left John Brown Gun Club seized control of the neighborhood, moved the barricades into a defensive position, and declared it the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone—even putting up a cardboard sign at the barricades declaring “you are now leaving the USA.”

So why didn't Capitol Police on January 6 behave in same manner, and enforce the law equally, and "de-escalate" and abandon their position and hand over the equivalent of six blocks to January 6 protesters?

How can a January 6 defendant be held to maximum penalty for action when he was led to believe that this action was allowed and tolerated because democrats had shown that you can take over capitol buildings and entire blocks and barricade against police without punishment?

And is this not CLEAR EVIDENCE, jury, that the law is being SELECTIVELY ENFORCED which means that the DEFENDANT is NOT TREATED EQUALLY UNDER THE LAW and therefore you must ACQUIT. Government had shown by example that this behavior and these actions were tolerated and not prosecuted. The Defendant relied on the behavior of government and relied on the civil rights legislation that he be held to equal standards under equal laws meant to apply equally to all. When corrupt government CHOOSES AND PICKS WHO IT CONVICTS, YOU MUST ACQUIT

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy