I don't know which is dumber. The Children's book or Stonehenge
(www.telegraph.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Stop it you fucking dumb retard. Arabs are 5th century. 2000 years. It referred to a fringe population at the time before the region adopted Arabic. It specifically does this after Islam.
The time period we're referring too, they didn't exist.
They aren't Persians Summerians Egyptians Phoenicians etc etc
The language is different.
As I said it's autism with you. Your understanding is based on association, and I might as well be speaking with a Neanderthal. It simply doesn't understand there was vastly different demographics speaking in different languages of competing Empires, and tribes. Your association is modern based off Islam.
No wonder where outta Africa came from. Listen to this guy.
5th century isn't modern and in any case, the word is much older than that.
You contradict yourself from post to post. You ramble incoherently. Get your fucking thoughts in order.
What didn't you understand in that fuck dumb head of yours?
Arab, as in Arabic spread with Islam. It really didn't exist before then.
5th century you dumb autist born with both feet in your mouth, is not the time period we are referring too. Thousands and thousands of years before the Arab.
Arabs existed before Islam. Long, long before Islam.
You are not making any sense. Your statements are nonsensical, factually incorrect and incomprehensible.
Something is seriously wrong in your head.
Look it up. The first mention of Arabs is from Syria 5th century. They really did not exist prior outside of a fringe group, because of competing demographics and empires. It's only as Islam spread that it centralised its competing factions, haha, not. But it provided a common religion Islam and common language Arabic.
You're such a stupid troll operating on a multiple account. You're a fucking dumb person in IRL. It's the way your brain processes stuff. It's completely dissociative. Your mindset associates modern concepts and then goes oh yea it must be the same then. Because some book of mythicism has said so. It wasn't written when it was suggested. There was thousands and thousands of years where empires came and went. Where language changed. Long before the Common Era. Thousands and thousands of years where people didn't go ohh our past started at this point, when Christ was born, because the book of common fables provided a reference. They suggested their past went back 100,000 years or more. A hundred thousand years of history, Indians, Egyptians, Summerians, Mayans, and many many more ancient cultures.
No wonder they sold out of Africa. You're the type of person with that kind of association. Arabs in your opinion aren't a huge demographic of diverse populations intermingled. They're the sand monkeys out of Africa.
Stop trolling me. You're blocked. I respond simply because it's amusing tripping up your dumb world view. It hasn't learned much, doesn't use Google, argues like a baby constantly, like that dumb kid with a finger up its nose, shitting itself, endlessly repeating something it doesn't have knowledge in, ironically cannot learn it off the Web. Or from debate.
The region of the Arab World, still has different languages today. Outside of Arabic. Like it did thousands of years ago. Back then it was vastly different. Where is Arabic on the Rosetta Stone. Wait what. Duh you drooling retard. Aramaic isn't Arab. It was modern to a hieroglyph. Your association.