I don't know which is dumber. The Children's book or Stonehenge
(www.telegraph.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
The parents. that buy that shit for their kids win the stupid contest.
Yep, I feel pity for anybody believing in Stonehenge. Buying dumb books like that deserve autism.
It has no basis. Celts were much closer to Greeks. Simple confirmation on Irish burial mounds and Turkish burial mounds. Oh look at King Midas, it's the same as Ireland. So a Turkic people spread over Europe.
But Stonehenge didn't exist. Not in any kind of circle marking anything else. It was arranged later where more of its stones were added and placed. Any former ruins were of give a shit, nobody else did for centuries. The Romans destroyed all former traces of any druids off the British Isles. They certainly didn't leave that there at all. Oxymoronic. Every picture can confirm its lie. Cranes, trains, diggers. Meanwhile the Wiki states it has kept adding stones.
Anatolians 5000 years ago weren't Turks. Turks are recent migrants to the region.
Stonehenge was built thousands of years before the Druids.
Your ignorance is truly pathetic.
You are such a fucking retard. I've blocked you. I rarely reply but I made the topic.
I call them Turkic because its script is one of the planet's oldest languages. But regionally, you don't use Google.
Simply type in Georgian wine making the first evidence of wine. How old, Google, 10k years? What were those people in that region? Reddish/brown hair, fair skin, light eyes. As a generalisation lighter. Not darker. Not black. How old is Gobekli Tepe? Now we look at the mummies found across the planet. Siberia. Some in South America. Egypt. The DNA aligns with a geographical region of Central Asia/Russia. Surely there might also be Neanderthal traces in it. It doesn't mean black and gay and fantasy.
What are you talking about Stonehenge. It's a hoax. If they added stones simply wiki. They added almost half the stones to it, recently. At what point is it thousands of years of anything else. Dumbass.
They still weren't Turkic. The Turkic people immigrated to the region during the Arab conquests.
Stonehenge was build a long time before the Druids existed. There are descriptions and depictions of it that are centuries old.
You have no fucking idea what you are talking about.
You're wording it different, but Ralph Ellis says people were exiled up there. Michael Tsarion points out queen Scotia has Nova Scotia named after her. There was trade, and interaction.
No. Wrong, fables. Celts were Greek descent, they were in Northern Italy, stretching accross Europe, not goths or visgoths different, Celts were who Rome destroyed in England with the druids, prior to them I call them Turkic because it's a much larger region. This same region same DNA has been found in South American ziggurats. Same red hair mummies in the pyramids. Also in Siberia. They weren't Black.
As far as the bullshit on Scotland hahaha. Modern fantasy. Complete conjecture. Nefertiti probably wasn't black either. That's the little myth you're spewing. A cousin escaped Egyptian civil war, and went to Ireland then Scotland. Because of its name. Ridiculous. As bad as that children's book.
Greek that comparison always was, not just because of our current royals. But there was the fable UK was Atlantis. No. Spain had its descendants. Particularly on Irish Neolithic stuff, it has lots untouched, unlike Britain's destroyed. Apart from the obvious hoax Stonehenge. But that comparison is the above Turkic people. King Midas tomb is the same burial mounds. Same burial mounds, all up the black sea, Europe, France. Etc
Stop calling everyone that learned different aspects of this topic names, and learn. That's what you're here for, right? I cited sources. If you don't like it, you know where to look to point to errors. Just blanketly noping everyone so you can argue isn't very smart. When you get caught up in your feelings for what should be an interesting discussion is it's also the first sign you're having an issue.
I said there was trade, and interaction. Anything else you're arguing is you arguing with yourself.