It's funny how all the other countries have to play along, no matter how bad the fake is. Just to keep the ruse going. If i was north korea, I would say I planted a flag on the moon and nasa would have to go along with it
No, the stars, sun and moon appear to revolve around the earth at exactly the same rate.
Stating that the moon is slower than the sun is just silly. Any child with a watch can prove that they cross the sky from horizon to horizon at exactly the same rate.
Why you ask? Because they are moving very little relative to the earth spinning in space.
I watched the video and learned that the moon is self illuminating, just like the sun. I learned that the Southern Stars like the Southern Cross don't exist ( I am not to believe my lying eyes). The moon disappears and is transparent sometimes? especially when it gets close to the Sun? Revel in the mystery?
So let me see if I have the right? The North pole is at the center of the Flat Earth Map and the stars spin around the north star above us at the same speed the Sun makes circles over us and the moon appears, lights up and disappears in some kind of retrograde motion? and the Antarctic is some kind of Ice barrier around everything holding the oceans in?
whoa there, what? southern cross doesn't exist? no, that was never claimed by me or anything in that video i sent. i literally have no idea where you got this idea.
The Flat Earth map. It shows that the Stars rotate around the North Star, which corresponds to the north pole.
There is no south pole and the stars above the outer edge of the FE map have no fixed point of rotation which means that the Southern Cross is not in a fixed position like the North Star. Therefore it doesn't exist.
According to the video, pretty much everything we observe in the heavens is an illusion, or a reflection, or self creating. A wonderful mystery.
I watched the live stream footage of the landing and this video has a point. The live footage was mostly a CGI depiction of the landing status and some shitty low-quality low-frame-rate video footage from the lander.
There was a comment made during the broadcast that there would be higher quality video that would be downlinked at a later time. But that has yet to happen.
It all seems very fishy, I am trying to rationalize such shitty footage in my mind. Higher quality color cameras are neither expensive nor do they weigh a lot. I understand that perhaps live footage has to be limited for bandwidth reasons but you can always transfer higher quality video after the fact.
ok the atari space invader graphic 'simulation' thing, fine whatever,
but at 3:08 with the potato camera, why wouldn't there have been better cameras at better angles that at least a top youtuber would use? like ok maybe sending a large high resolution file would have to wait, but doubt they will release much more.
It's funny how all the other countries have to play along, no matter how bad the fake is. Just to keep the ruse going. If i was north korea, I would say I planted a flag on the moon and nasa would have to go along with it
Designated shitting craters
The fact that Japan and Russia both failed this year yet India lands with a $75(?) million budget after just recently getting in the space game.
No. Oh, and that video. No.
The Indian Space program was started 55 years ago and has been launching satellites since the 1990s
Educate yourself.
That footage from India is worse than their Bollywood... And that is saying something.
I doubt it. What does landing on the moon even mean? A computer did it? Like a simulation, or a program.
Did it occur on the moon or on the computer? Fuck off.
Some other day they'll land on the moon and not in CGI.
I debate the term landing on the Moon. Unless it's manned. Then I'll still be skeptical if they show me a movie, and not the actual footage.
No, the stars, sun and moon appear to revolve around the earth at exactly the same rate.
Stating that the moon is slower than the sun is just silly. Any child with a watch can prove that they cross the sky from horizon to horizon at exactly the same rate.
Why you ask? Because they are moving very little relative to the earth spinning in space.
I watched the video and learned that the moon is self illuminating, just like the sun. I learned that the Southern Stars like the Southern Cross don't exist ( I am not to believe my lying eyes). The moon disappears and is transparent sometimes? especially when it gets close to the Sun? Revel in the mystery?
So let me see if I have the right? The North pole is at the center of the Flat Earth Map and the stars spin around the north star above us at the same speed the Sun makes circles over us and the moon appears, lights up and disappears in some kind of retrograde motion? and the Antarctic is some kind of Ice barrier around everything holding the oceans in?
The Flat Earth map. It shows that the Stars rotate around the North Star, which corresponds to the north pole.
There is no south pole and the stars above the outer edge of the FE map have no fixed point of rotation which means that the Southern Cross is not in a fixed position like the North Star. Therefore it doesn't exist.
According to the video, pretty much everything we observe in the heavens is an illusion, or a reflection, or self creating. A wonderful mystery.
I watched the live stream footage of the landing and this video has a point. The live footage was mostly a CGI depiction of the landing status and some shitty low-quality low-frame-rate video footage from the lander.
There was a comment made during the broadcast that there would be higher quality video that would be downlinked at a later time. But that has yet to happen.
It all seems very fishy, I am trying to rationalize such shitty footage in my mind. Higher quality color cameras are neither expensive nor do they weigh a lot. I understand that perhaps live footage has to be limited for bandwidth reasons but you can always transfer higher quality video after the fact.
It does make you wonder what's going on.
ok the atari space invader graphic 'simulation' thing, fine whatever,
but at 3:08 with the potato camera, why wouldn't there have been better cameras at better angles that at least a top youtuber would use? like ok maybe sending a large high resolution file would have to wait, but doubt they will release much more.