Stop this bullshit. They're real. To what extent remains the exact reason we don't use them.
At this rate. We will. Almost a matter of fact. Probability is becoming significant.
Uranium is edible you probably ingest trace amounts. It is a very common element, although the methods of its extraction and enrichment are costly. Uranium enriched into 235 is where it becomes far more radioactive.
If the workers at the nuclear power plant in piketon ended up with cancer just from being around the weapons grade stuff, I couldnt imagine what would happen if you ate that and not just some uranium you pulled out of the ground.
Funny that amid the current war with Russia, the corporate jew media doesn't dare mention that Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton accepted $143 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation from Russian investors in Nuclear Uranium just as Hillary approved the sale.
RUSSIANS ARE BAD!!!! Unless the Clintons are accepting bribes and selling them nuclear uranium. https://archive.is/nqgEf
In a 2019 report of cancer from 2012 to 2016, Ohio's health department revealed Pike County had an average of 179 new cancer cases and 67 deaths each year in a county that, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, has a population of just 27,772. Brewster is well aware of the stunning cancer figures in his county. Nov 19, 2020
If they were processing plutonium and not just uranium and the chief fucking scientist didnt know, they were taking zero precautions for it. Might explain the cancer rates, besides you know just plain incompetency by higher ups. Who were telling the workers it was safe in the 60's and 70's to dump the waste into the waterways and soil, jesus christ.
I don't have a strong enough opinion to really argue one way or the other. Currently I believe we probably do have a very strong bomb, but its power and impact is likely exaggerated as well as warnings about nuclear fallout. Nagasaki and Hiroshima are thriving cities today. I was told the land would be destroyed for a thousand years?!? I also think it was part of a big propaganda plot (forcing kids to hide under desks while sirens go off) to make boomers so brainwashed and scared of white Russians. USA probably bluffed about its abilities for decades and maybe the military did finally figure it out.
I also think that lots of the early atomic bomb footage is faked. It looks like miniature models getting blown away. Such as this footage: Atomic Bomb Test; Operation Cue from 1955 (Original version) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tr76hNngqts
Is it nuclear? I don't know. It looks like it will fuck shit up, though.
It's a subject i should study more. I do think there is a conspiracy here. I posted this footage because it is a classic scene often added to fake nuke arguments.
Nuclear 'bombs' are real and their 'yields' are correct. They do convert mass into energy.
Almost 100% of the energy created is heat in the form of EM radiation. In many ways it is similar to lightening.
The shockwave is produced by superheating the air around the blast and the pressure produced by the explosion plummets at a rate of PSI = 1/radius^3. It will take very little distance from the center of the blast to have no appreciable force.
A nuclear explosion in the vacuum of space would simply be a ball of very bright light with no shock wave at all.
Expanding gasses make much better bombs, especially if they can be confined. Thermobaric bombs in buildings or valleys make extremely effective explosions.
Stop this bullshit. They're real. To what extent remains the exact reason we don't use them.
At this rate. We will. Almost a matter of fact. Probability is becoming significant.
Uranium is edible you probably ingest trace amounts. It is a very common element, although the methods of its extraction and enrichment are costly. Uranium enriched into 235 is where it becomes far more radioactive.
My first thought was of david hahn.
Built a small backyard reactor with the radioactive material of smoke alarms, glow in the dark dials, and camping lanterns.
It really doesnt take a very strong material to create a nuclear reaction.
To create a explosion though requires 98% or something.
https://youtu.be/G0QMeTjcJDA?t=411
If the workers at the nuclear power plant in piketon ended up with cancer just from being around the weapons grade stuff, I couldnt imagine what would happen if you ate that and not just some uranium you pulled out of the ground.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osy55tJVGXE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xT49uvrctGU
(I just watched this video, LOL, I wouldnt be surprised if they were processing russian nuclear missiles, explains alot really.)
Was actually surprised that uranium exists naturally in nova scotia. Seems like a weird place for it.
https://tmans.ca/uranium
Funny that amid the current war with Russia, the corporate jew media doesn't dare mention that Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton accepted $143 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation from Russian investors in Nuclear Uranium just as Hillary approved the sale.
RUSSIANS ARE BAD!!!! Unless the Clintons are accepting bribes and selling them nuclear uranium. https://archive.is/nqgEf
So I am confused, you do believe in nuclear weapons? I cant keep track of what people believe in this forum anymore LOL.
Watched this video of some residents in piketon, you can call bullshit, but it does have unsually high cancer amounts for a small area.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_z3OqEK9P0A
Anyway, found this fascinating documentary though, that I am watching now.
Do people think this is all fake?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7jUBak6mgI
If they were processing plutonium and not just uranium and the chief fucking scientist didnt know, they were taking zero precautions for it. Might explain the cancer rates, besides you know just plain incompetency by higher ups. Who were telling the workers it was safe in the 60's and 70's to dump the waste into the waterways and soil, jesus christ.
I don't have a strong enough opinion to really argue one way or the other. Currently I believe we probably do have a very strong bomb, but its power and impact is likely exaggerated as well as warnings about nuclear fallout. Nagasaki and Hiroshima are thriving cities today. I was told the land would be destroyed for a thousand years?!? I also think it was part of a big propaganda plot (forcing kids to hide under desks while sirens go off) to make boomers so brainwashed and scared of white Russians. USA probably bluffed about its abilities for decades and maybe the military did finally figure it out.
I also think that lots of the early atomic bomb footage is faked. It looks like miniature models getting blown away. Such as this footage: Atomic Bomb Test; Operation Cue from 1955 (Original version) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tr76hNngqts
What do you think? Footage is authentic or faked?
Bombs like this create huge mushroom clouds and are devastating. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtCTzbh4mNQ
Is it nuclear? I don't know. It looks like it will fuck shit up, though.
It's a subject i should study more. I do think there is a conspiracy here. I posted this footage because it is a classic scene often added to fake nuke arguments.
My friend told me about allies having officially dropped traditional bombs the week before killing 100k.
Who told you that?
Look up "nuclear fallout"
Yeah, what about it?
Now, who told you that the fallout from the bombs would destroy the land in Nagasaki and Hiroshima for a thousand years?
Spoiler: nobody did.
Again, out of ignorance, you create a narrative in your head and then you get confused and angry about your own imagination.
Nuclear 'bombs' are real and their 'yields' are correct. They do convert mass into energy.
Almost 100% of the energy created is heat in the form of EM radiation. In many ways it is similar to lightening.
The shockwave is produced by superheating the air around the blast and the pressure produced by the explosion plummets at a rate of PSI = 1/radius^3. It will take very little distance from the center of the blast to have no appreciable force.
A nuclear explosion in the vacuum of space would simply be a ball of very bright light with no shock wave at all.
Expanding gasses make much better bombs, especially if they can be confined. Thermobaric bombs in buildings or valleys make extremely effective explosions.
Ayy it's the full vid from my link the other day.
Now try the same with Plutonium.