He states the bible as truth, in spite of contradictions, translations, and the fact that every word in it was written by man. He also claims that we have no free will, and that we are corrupt from birth. Jesus is in fact not even a name, but a title. I will not accept his words and interpretations as those of God, as it paradoxically embraces that which he is arguing against. He is crafting the image of God from his perspective.
Then he props up a straw man of having sex with animals? What? Why? Then goes on to state many facts by name only, and calling out them, or they.
Name changes? God, Jehovah, Jesus?
There are no points of reference of anything he is saying, He's just moving from point to point without contextual reference.
In fact I can sum up every sentence he says as the following:
The bible clearly states,whatever I want to say next, while quoting nothing
Not a single passage or book number mentioned or named. Oh wait. I need to be looking at the images that he is misquoting, and adding his own context to.
10:54; starwars.wikia.com.
That's irrelevant. Why is he using fiction as a talking point?
This is like getting bludgeoned to death with a fresh salmon!
Remember, all lies contain an element of truth.
He said that. Suppository without being facetious.
Do not believe everything you here from the pulpit, just because it is branded Christian.
He said that too! Is this intentional? Is this deception real?
Are you aware of your point even? I would rather listen to the video than read your comments... You seem personally affected by Christianity in some way. If you are against reading a book, then I don't think you should discourage others to do it.
I get it. You are angry because he is not spoon-feeding you information that you can check in 5 seconds online. Perhaps the information is not meant for you. Thank for your opinion though. Just FYI, your scoffing at information is predicted in the Bible. Do you notice how you only mock without actually presenting any valuable information? Sorry, but actual discussions demand actual arguments, not the scoffing of a child.
When does he contradict himself? He is quoting the book.
Why would you call him a prophet? :D Do you even know what it means?
These are not arguments, again you react like a child that has something personal against Christianity or this person. That's not an insult. It's the way you present your "arguments", which are baseless, but I will still wait for any example that you can put forth, if any. So far, you just throw a fit.
The bible clearly states, whatever I want to say next, while quoting nothing
This is how you put forth your "argumentation". :D You actually wrote that. :D
10:54; starwars.wikia.com.
Grown man argumentation? Or a fit? You be the judge. :D You really wrote that... :D
:D :D :D I like you. You're in total denial. I remain with my statement that you throw a childish fit. Most people will just watch the video instead of immediately siding with the kid, who personally hates Christianity. So, I seriously doubt your fit will attract any attention. Even I got bored arguing with a child...
"Baseless insults are not arguments" - 10:54 Luke Skywalker
He states the bible as truth, in spite of contradictions, translations, and the fact that every word in it was written by man. He also claims that we have no free will, and that we are corrupt from birth. Jesus is in fact not even a name, but a title. I will not accept his words and interpretations as those of God, as it paradoxically embraces that which he is arguing against. He is crafting the image of God from his perspective.
Then he props up a straw man of having sex with animals? What? Why? Then goes on to state many facts by name only, and calling out them, or they.
Name changes? God, Jehovah, Jesus?
There are no points of reference of anything he is saying, He's just moving from point to point without contextual reference.
In fact I can sum up every sentence he says as the following:
Not a single passage or book number mentioned or named. Oh wait. I need to be looking at the images that he is misquoting, and adding his own context to.
That's irrelevant. Why is he using fiction as a talking point? This is like getting bludgeoned to death with a fresh salmon!
He said that. Suppository without being facetious.
He said that too! Is this intentional? Is this deception real?
Are you aware of your point even? I would rather listen to the video than read your comments... You seem personally affected by Christianity in some way. If you are against reading a book, then I don't think you should discourage others to do it.
I get it. You are angry because he is not spoon-feeding you information that you can check in 5 seconds online. Perhaps the information is not meant for you. Thank for your opinion though. Just FYI, your scoffing at information is predicted in the Bible. Do you notice how you only mock without actually presenting any valuable information? Sorry, but actual discussions demand actual arguments, not the scoffing of a child.
My point is, he contradicts himself and makes no sense. He literally tells you that others aren't true Christians and to listen to him. False prophet.
I made arguments, you retorted with insults. Yes, like a child would. Why have you done this?
Touchy... :D
When does he contradict himself? He is quoting the book.
Why would you call him a prophet? :D Do you even know what it means?
These are not arguments, again you react like a child that has something personal against Christianity or this person. That's not an insult. It's the way you present your "arguments", which are baseless, but I will still wait for any example that you can put forth, if any. So far, you just throw a fit.
This is how you put forth your "argumentation". :D You actually wrote that. :D
Grown man argumentation? Or a fit? You be the judge. :D You really wrote that... :D
:D :D :D I like you. You're in total denial. I remain with my statement that you throw a childish fit. Most people will just watch the video instead of immediately siding with the kid, who personally hates Christianity. So, I seriously doubt your fit will attract any attention. Even I got bored arguing with a child...
"Baseless insults are not arguments" - 10:54 Luke Skywalker
You are beneath me.
ANIMA-tion generates SEX (Latin seco; to divide), hence being division (life) within animation (inception towards death).
Same with "animal"; "sex" and every other suggested word. Nature doesn't brand; it burns...
thread derailment
incomprehensible reply
troll account
Do you comprehend that animation (motion) divides itself (momentum)?