Yea, I kinda knew you'd come back with that. Thing is, the case precedent is overwhelming and goes back centuries, so this is kinda like you asking, legally speaking, for a source for where it says courts have judicial review or where it says the government can collect taxes. It's fairly absurd on its face.
So how's this, I put the onus on you find a court case that applies First Amendment protections to the Church of Satan or a similar organization. They don't exist.
Source?
Prove me wrong.
You made the claim.
Yea, I kinda knew you'd come back with that. Thing is, the case precedent is overwhelming and goes back centuries, so this is kinda like you asking, legally speaking, for a source for where it says courts have judicial review or where it says the government can collect taxes. It's fairly absurd on its face.
So how's this, I put the onus on you find a court case that applies First Amendment protections to the Church of Satan or a similar organization. They don't exist.
Still, since you're going to come back and say "source" again like a good reddit leftist, here is one written from just your perspective: https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/satanic-temple-abortion-rights-supreme-court-1048833/
The satanic temple isn't worshipping demons and worshipping demons is not mentioned anywhere in the article.
Try again.