Yea, I kinda knew you'd come back with that. Thing is, the case precedent is overwhelming and goes back centuries, so this is kinda like you asking, legally speaking, for a source for where it says courts have judicial review or where it says the government can collect taxes. It's fairly absurd on its face.
So how's this, I put the onus on you find a court case that applies First Amendment protections to the Church of Satan or a similar organization. They don't exist.
Prove me wrong.
You made the claim.
Yea, I kinda knew you'd come back with that. Thing is, the case precedent is overwhelming and goes back centuries, so this is kinda like you asking, legally speaking, for a source for where it says courts have judicial review or where it says the government can collect taxes. It's fairly absurd on its face.
So how's this, I put the onus on you find a court case that applies First Amendment protections to the Church of Satan or a similar organization. They don't exist.
Still, since you're going to come back and say "source" again like a good reddit leftist, here is one written from just your perspective: https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/satanic-temple-abortion-rights-supreme-court-1048833/
The satanic temple isn't worshipping demons and worshipping demons is not mentioned anywhere in the article.
Try again.
You're pretty obtuse when you try to be.
The Church of Satan...worships Satan...it's in the name.
Demon worship, either via them or some other cult, do not have First Amendment protections, never have. Sorry!