Everybody have that direct feed from most space vehicles. You just need antenna and receiver to receive it. And today it is amasingly simple and cheap to do. Point antenna to the sky, tune your receiver and set up decoder. Get your direct feed.
Haha, that transmission is brought to you how from where. Come on. Space? Like the Moon Landing. Everybody saw it on TV with their antenna. It must be real right.
Like all these visits to Ukraine. They must be going there, with all those bombs. I mean they never did to Afghanistan. Why is Zelenskyy never in? Cgi like our news has become. It pays more from the office programming it.
The same as most of the ISS. So many videos from the studio.
As far as aliens. Where. Where. If they're "real" they're more than a grainy image. Now where are those images. Not bullshit. Instead they're not proved. They simply pay.
The aliens shut down the feed? That Congress. We detected it on the radar. But it shut down the radar. We cannot prove or disprove it. We can talk more in secret. It needs proper clearance. The craft has no nuts and bolts, but it's real. We've never seen an Alien, but we've captured one. I mean come on. You can't make that shit up?
I am still waiting for Aliens to address the UN instead of Congress.
Haha, that transmission is brought to you how from where. Come on. Space?
Depends on where you point your antenna. For any signal above dozen of MHz you could perfectly know direction it comes from.
If you are clearly getting signal from something that moves with speed of 7km/s at altitude around 800km, then you have to develop outstanding doublethink ability to deny what you are observing.
Space is pretty ordinary thing, despite all that brainwashing about complexity and huge efforts necessary. It is a routine commonness for a half century minimum.
If even you, who are spending time on this marginal forum, are too uncurious to rise your head up from your phone or computer and do something to check things by yourself, then their program of extermination of any curiosity in the herd are pretty successfull. Consuming data from internet only, you will never figure out anything useful. And that's what they hoping for.
That transmission is from the studio it gets sent to a Satellite. Suddenly it's from Space, because it's off the Internet. I mean where did it come from? My phone picking up the network signal. My router logging into the internet. My antenna picking up a transmission from a broadcaster?
Space? I mean there's the Seti program and they haven't heard the aliens. Apperantly they heard the gape a blackhole makes.
Okay I'll humour you and I should type into Google, Space videos. What about the livestream from hubble? Perhaps I should tune my sky dish into CNN or NASA?
That transmission is from the studio it gets sent to a Satellite.
And it suddenly shows exactly same cloud pattern I have above right now. It is realtime, if you are not aware.
So, I receive a transmission from a satellite that uploaded from studio that receive the image from another satellite that passes over me along with satellite that retransmits the picture from studio to me. Now we have two satellites in space just to please me and some other people who have hands in right place to receive satellite imagery. Nice. What prevents me and others from receiving imagery from that second satellite that provide image to the studio?
That's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard as an argument for "space is fake" narrative. :) They need two space satellites instead of one to cheat over few hundreds of people who could easily receive transmission from satellite that get real imagery for studio.
I mean there's the Seti program and they haven't heard the aliens.
It is complete idiocy to suppose that advanced civilisations would use that insanely slow electromagnetic waves for interstellar communication. There is no any sense in communication when delivery time is measured in tens and hundreds of years. It is the same level of idiocy as looking for pedestrian messenger with message in hand in 21 century. When everybody use smartphones to communicate instead of sending messages with messengers.
What about the livestream from hubble? Perhaps I should tune my sky dish into CNN or NASA?
AFAIK, Hubble does not broadcast imagery to the Earth as livestream, because acuiring new image took a long time and image is huge. It is same thing as expecting livestream from flatbed paper scanner. Acquired image send to the Earth using high-speed transmission link to one of TDRSS satellites. However, you could receive realtime Hubble telemetry in the S-band when it is over your head. Theoretically, you could try to catch imagery transmission, but you have to wait a moment when Hubble already got an image, TDRSS satellite is between Hubble and Earth and it is over your head. Also you obviously need to figure out frequency, modulation and encoding of that transmission. Nice thing to get some fun, but could take a very long time. And, meanwhile Hubble is out of fashion today, and probably will be deorbited soon, Webb is new toy, better go after it.
Everybody have that direct feed from most space vehicles. You just need antenna and receiver to receive it. And today it is amasingly simple and cheap to do. Point antenna to the sky, tune your receiver and set up decoder. Get your direct feed.
Haha, that transmission is brought to you how from where. Come on. Space? Like the Moon Landing. Everybody saw it on TV with their antenna. It must be real right.
Like all these visits to Ukraine. They must be going there, with all those bombs. I mean they never did to Afghanistan. Why is Zelenskyy never in? Cgi like our news has become. It pays more from the office programming it.
The same as most of the ISS. So many videos from the studio.
As far as aliens. Where. Where. If they're "real" they're more than a grainy image. Now where are those images. Not bullshit. Instead they're not proved. They simply pay.
The aliens shut down the feed? That Congress. We detected it on the radar. But it shut down the radar. We cannot prove or disprove it. We can talk more in secret. It needs proper clearance. The craft has no nuts and bolts, but it's real. We've never seen an Alien, but we've captured one. I mean come on. You can't make that shit up?
I am still waiting for Aliens to address the UN instead of Congress.
Depends on where you point your antenna. For any signal above dozen of MHz you could perfectly know direction it comes from.
If you are clearly getting signal from something that moves with speed of 7km/s at altitude around 800km, then you have to develop outstanding doublethink ability to deny what you are observing.
Space is pretty ordinary thing, despite all that brainwashing about complexity and huge efforts necessary. It is a routine commonness for a half century minimum.
If even you, who are spending time on this marginal forum, are too uncurious to rise your head up from your phone or computer and do something to check things by yourself, then their program of extermination of any curiosity in the herd are pretty successfull. Consuming data from internet only, you will never figure out anything useful. And that's what they hoping for.
That transmission is from the studio it gets sent to a Satellite. Suddenly it's from Space, because it's off the Internet. I mean where did it come from? My phone picking up the network signal. My router logging into the internet. My antenna picking up a transmission from a broadcaster?
Space? I mean there's the Seti program and they haven't heard the aliens. Apperantly they heard the gape a blackhole makes.
Okay I'll humour you and I should type into Google, Space videos. What about the livestream from hubble? Perhaps I should tune my sky dish into CNN or NASA?
And it suddenly shows exactly same cloud pattern I have above right now. It is realtime, if you are not aware.
So, I receive a transmission from a satellite that uploaded from studio that receive the image from another satellite that passes over me along with satellite that retransmits the picture from studio to me. Now we have two satellites in space just to please me and some other people who have hands in right place to receive satellite imagery. Nice. What prevents me and others from receiving imagery from that second satellite that provide image to the studio?
That's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard as an argument for "space is fake" narrative. :) They need two space satellites instead of one to cheat over few hundreds of people who could easily receive transmission from satellite that get real imagery for studio.
It is complete idiocy to suppose that advanced civilisations would use that insanely slow electromagnetic waves for interstellar communication. There is no any sense in communication when delivery time is measured in tens and hundreds of years. It is the same level of idiocy as looking for pedestrian messenger with message in hand in 21 century. When everybody use smartphones to communicate instead of sending messages with messengers.
AFAIK, Hubble does not broadcast imagery to the Earth as livestream, because acuiring new image took a long time and image is huge. It is same thing as expecting livestream from flatbed paper scanner. Acquired image send to the Earth using high-speed transmission link to one of TDRSS satellites. However, you could receive realtime Hubble telemetry in the S-band when it is over your head. Theoretically, you could try to catch imagery transmission, but you have to wait a moment when Hubble already got an image, TDRSS satellite is between Hubble and Earth and it is over your head. Also you obviously need to figure out frequency, modulation and encoding of that transmission. Nice thing to get some fun, but could take a very long time. And, meanwhile Hubble is out of fashion today, and probably will be deorbited soon, Webb is new toy, better go after it.