That transmission is from the studio it gets sent to a Satellite.
And it suddenly shows exactly same cloud pattern I have above right now. It is realtime, if you are not aware.
So, I receive a transmission from a satellite that uploaded from studio that receive the image from another satellite that passes over me along with satellite that retransmits the picture from studio to me. Now we have two satellites in space just to please me and some other people who have hands in right place to receive satellite imagery. Nice. What prevents me and others from receiving imagery from that second satellite that provide image to the studio?
That's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard as an argument for "space is fake" narrative. :) They need two space satellites instead of one to cheat over few hundreds of people who could easily receive transmission from satellite that get real imagery for studio.
I mean there's the Seti program and they haven't heard the aliens.
It is complete idiocy to suppose that advanced civilisations would use that insanely slow electromagnetic waves for interstellar communication. There is no any sense in communication when delivery time is measured in tens and hundreds of years. It is the same level of idiocy as looking for pedestrian messenger with message in hand in 21 century. When everybody use smartphones to communicate instead of sending messages with messengers.
What about the livestream from hubble? Perhaps I should tune my sky dish into CNN or NASA?
AFAIK, Hubble does not broadcast imagery to the Earth as livestream, because acuiring new image took a long time and image is huge. It is same thing as expecting livestream from flatbed paper scanner. Acquired image send to the Earth using high-speed transmission link to one of TDRSS satellites. However, you could receive realtime Hubble telemetry in the S-band when it is over your head. Theoretically, you could try to catch imagery transmission, but you have to wait a moment when Hubble already got an image, TDRSS satellite is between Hubble and Earth and it is over your head. Also you obviously need to figure out frequency, modulation and encoding of that transmission. Nice thing to get some fun, but could take a very long time. And, meanwhile Hubble is out of fashion today, and probably will be deorbited soon, Webb is new toy, better go after it.
And it suddenly shows exactly same cloud pattern I have above right now. It is realtime, if you are not aware.
So, I receive a transmission from a satellite that uploaded from studio that receive the image from another satellite that passes over me along with satellite that retransmits the picture from studio to me. Now we have two satellites in space just to please me and some other people who have hands in right place to receive satellite imagery. Nice. What prevents me and others from receiving imagery from that second satellite that provide image to the studio?
That's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard as an argument for "space is fake" narrative. :) They need two space satellites instead of one to cheat over few hundreds of people who could easily receive transmission from satellite that get real imagery for studio.
It is complete idiocy to suppose that advanced civilisations would use that insanely slow electromagnetic waves for interstellar communication. There is no any sense in communication when delivery time is measured in tens and hundreds of years. It is the same level of idiocy as looking for pedestrian messenger with message in hand in 21 century. When everybody use smartphones to communicate instead of sending messages with messengers.
AFAIK, Hubble does not broadcast imagery to the Earth as livestream, because acuiring new image took a long time and image is huge. It is same thing as expecting livestream from flatbed paper scanner. Acquired image send to the Earth using high-speed transmission link to one of TDRSS satellites. However, you could receive realtime Hubble telemetry in the S-band when it is over your head. Theoretically, you could try to catch imagery transmission, but you have to wait a moment when Hubble already got an image, TDRSS satellite is between Hubble and Earth and it is over your head. Also you obviously need to figure out frequency, modulation and encoding of that transmission. Nice thing to get some fun, but could take a very long time. And, meanwhile Hubble is out of fashion today, and probably will be deorbited soon, Webb is new toy, better go after it.