The LA Times is putting in such a valiant struggle to blackwash the Nazis with this issue they can barely stand to state the facts.
You'd never, ever see it today, but a few years ago on Netflix I watched a German-produced drama about a group of four young friends caught up by the war in different ways and taking very different paths through it.
The most surprising scene was where one of the young friends, a Jew, runs back to his parents after some "anti-Semitic" incident. He tells them they all need to flee Germany before it gets worse. He's shocked when his parents flatly refuse. They tell him, "We're loyal German citizens, and we aren't going anywhere when our country is at war."
As cucked as Germany is, I couldn't believe this was allowed to be portrayed. But it made me think that perhaps the vast majority of the 100k Jewish soldiers--however they felt about certain policies of the Nazis--had the identical sentiment. The same goes for Japanese-Americans, of whom only a handful left the country at the outbreak of WW2.
I once did some research that led me to calculate that about 8% of the Confederate soldiers at the Battle of Gettysburg were blacks, both slave and free. Of course, They won't show you even one.
All these types of impression really start to put strain of what we're supposed to believe is "history".
a) the few operate fiction (suggested) within reality (perceivable); while the many are trapped within fact (want) vs fiction (not want) reasoning; while ignoring reality (need).
b) one can only stand (erect; directed upward) within motion, while suggested facts tempt one to hold onto them.
We're loyal German citizens..
LOY'AL, adjective (Latin lex, law) - "faithful to superior; plighted faith; subjected to others"...that implies to others; not to a place suggested by others.
He tells them they all need to...
Ones consent (want or not want) to a suggestion by another (he tells) tempts one to ignore perceivable (need).
As cucked as Germany is, I couldn't believe...
Both believer and disbeliever are consenting to be cucked by those who suggest them what to belief/disbelief.
the vast majority of the 100k...had the identical sentiment
Or you are being tricked to ignore that each ONE represents a different partial within whole...
What if others suggest sentimentalism (sentiment); identitarianism (identical); collectivism (vast majority); mathematicism (100k); pastism (had) and theism (the) to distract ONE from discerning self?
same goes for Japanese-Americans
a) do you comprehend that Japan and America imply a "different" position to one another?
b) do you comprehend the contradiction of suggesting that the "same" goes for "different" positions?
c) suggesting to be a Japanese-American implies being "there-here"...that contradicts perceivable.
history
a) he-brew his-story...jew fell for it.
b) the foundation for "his" implies motion, hence motion (male) to momentum (female) to trans-form.
c) motion (his) doesn't store (story)...it moves product.
d) others suggest stories to tempt one to willingly hold onto, while ignoring the need to adapt to moving production as the moved (inception towards death) product (life).
One veteran interviewed by Rigg was a religious Jew, now 82 and living in northern Germany, who assumed a non-Jewish identity, became an army captain, married a Jewish girl from his hometown and successfully remained a practicing Jew within the German army for the entire war.
Helmut Schmidt, West Germany’s chancellor from 1974 to 1982, told Rigg he successfully hid the fact that he had a Jewish grandfather from fellow officers in the wartime Luftwaffe, the air force. Schmidt thought his case was rare. It wasn’t, says Rigg.
“Thousands of men of Jewish ancestry fought in the Nazi military because they were drafted. But many were career soldiers, and that forced them to apply for the German blood declaration,” Rigg said. “What’s sick here is that, even though Hitler gave the approvals, the officers’ relatives were being exterminated behind their backs. . . . Were most of these people so egotistical they didn’t care who died just so they could live?”
The Nazi regime reeked of hypocrisy, Rigg’s new research makes plain. He documents the case of Field Marshal Erhard Milch, deputy to Luftwaffe chief Hermann Goering. Long rumored to have been Jewish, Milch in fact had a Jewish father, which, according to Nazi code, made him unacceptable to serve in the armed forces. But in 1935, Rigg’s research shows, Goering, Hitler’s chosen successor, falsified documents to declare Milch of Aryan descent by asserting that his mother’s brother was really his father.
About 100,000 Jews served in the German army in World War I, and about 12,000 of them were killed. Veterans thought their service would protect them against the Nazi crackdown early in World War II, Rigg said.
The LA Times is putting in such a valiant struggle to blackwash the Nazis with this issue they can barely stand to state the facts.
You'd never, ever see it today, but a few years ago on Netflix I watched a German-produced drama about a group of four young friends caught up by the war in different ways and taking very different paths through it.
The most surprising scene was where one of the young friends, a Jew, runs back to his parents after some "anti-Semitic" incident. He tells them they all need to flee Germany before it gets worse. He's shocked when his parents flatly refuse. They tell him, "We're loyal German citizens, and we aren't going anywhere when our country is at war."
As cucked as Germany is, I couldn't believe this was allowed to be portrayed. But it made me think that perhaps the vast majority of the 100k Jewish soldiers--however they felt about certain policies of the Nazis--had the identical sentiment. The same goes for Japanese-Americans, of whom only a handful left the country at the outbreak of WW2.
I once did some research that led me to calculate that about 8% of the Confederate soldiers at the Battle of Gettysburg were blacks, both slave and free. Of course, They won't show you even one.
All these types of impression really start to put strain of what we're supposed to believe is "history".
Well put! WW2 was complicated. It's neither the official story nor the Hitler was a complete puppet/Jew story.
a) the few operate fiction (suggested) within reality (perceivable); while the many are trapped within fact (want) vs fiction (not want) reasoning; while ignoring reality (need).
b) one can only stand (erect; directed upward) within motion, while suggested facts tempt one to hold onto them.
LOY'AL, adjective (Latin lex, law) - "faithful to superior; plighted faith; subjected to others"...that implies to others; not to a place suggested by others.
Ones consent (want or not want) to a suggestion by another (he tells) tempts one to ignore perceivable (need).
Both believer and disbeliever are consenting to be cucked by those who suggest them what to belief/disbelief.
Or you are being tricked to ignore that each ONE represents a different partial within whole...
What if others suggest sentimentalism (sentiment); identitarianism (identical); collectivism (vast majority); mathematicism (100k); pastism (had) and theism (the) to distract ONE from discerning self?
a) do you comprehend that Japan and America imply a "different" position to one another?
b) do you comprehend the contradiction of suggesting that the "same" goes for "different" positions?
c) suggesting to be a Japanese-American implies being "there-here"...that contradicts perceivable.
a) he-brew his-story...jew fell for it.
b) the foundation for "his" implies motion, hence motion (male) to momentum (female) to trans-form.
c) motion (his) doesn't store (story)...it moves product.
d) others suggest stories to tempt one to willingly hold onto, while ignoring the need to adapt to moving production as the moved (inception towards death) product (life).