Immigration
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Absolutely. How many more services cater for this person/persons. How many more. In the West, they did this, MiT, a single baby growing to a toddler is worth in emissions a lifetime of flights from London to Paris.
There is nothing environmental about mass migration. Remember the narrative, man made. So it is human intervention that has caused climate change.
The single biggest event in climate history would be the USA.
Today it's mass migration.
But there is absolutely nothing green or environmental in the narrative it exploits new products and services. Therefore mass migration isn't an issue. It's also profiting. Banks the major sponsors cause debt. They therefore profit. More services, causing premiums, every transaction pays the bank. Every loan. Meanwhile land owners and service providers increase rent and subscriptions. Generating revenue for the banks, loaning.
Nothing environmental about it. Human intervention. Nature their own hostile environment, hot, lack of food isn't culling them, instead they're flooding into urbanisation causing and increasing products and services. It in turn is impacting the climate. We are talking the global population quadrupling in less than 100 years. What has caused it. Mass migration.
Until far more are economic migrants, they have an IPhone it tells them too.
Wildfires in Greece mass migration, Italy, in Australia, in Spain, Canada, Sweden, California. Look at those populations. What about Pakistan. Florida. Bangladesh. Look at that population and migration.
Migrants should pay a carbon tax. It should be like student loans. They should be indentured to the climates they impact.
A real holocaust would significantly reduce the carbon emissions of both the rich and the predatory jew.
I have formed a hypothesis that predicts that a rich Jew, based upon his own filthy deceptively earned large wealth and expenditure along with his jew privilege, utilizes far greater resources and produces a much greater carbon footprint than the average gentile.
If my hypothesis is true, then there is a fundamental and justifiable scientific basis to exterminate jews in mass numbers in a real holocaust to save Earth from climate change disaster or from the destruction jews otherwise bring upon every nation they infest.
Do you not think that Jews, when among themselves, plot and discern our future and demise as though we are cattle on their farm? The jew that wants to feed our wives birth control to sterilize her and make her unfruitful and unprosperous and wants to inject us with their jew poisons they market as medicine? Does the benefit of a jew infesting your civilization outweigh the threats they pose; namely this impending climate disaster?
The jew lies to us about climate change but their lie never holds up because their own behavior and actions contradict what they demand of us (suffering) as a solution.
This is like the Jew Kike Chuck Schumer who supports abortion in the USA but supports ANTI-abortion movements in Israel. The lying deceitful jew wants to abort the GENTILE BABY, but not the JEW BABY. That is the very definition of a racist, eugenicist, and all the scary labels they sling upon you or me under the guise that they have any moral high ground whatsoever.
Hahaha. It's a nice hypothesis. But it doesn't stop mass migration. Although it might?