That Joe is compromised is certainly a problem, but the more subtle problem, I've come to realize, is that people put their faith in such people and outsource their discernment to them. This is the same whether it's Anderson Cooper or Sean Hannity or Joe Rogan or Graham Hancock. You just get different helpings of sugar with different ones to help very similar medicines go down.
Of the top three far and away most important researchers I know of on the Internet, one of them gets stuff wrong all the time and another I am certain is a disinformation agent.
The third, Mark Passio, is the only one whose work I could recommend without being very selective and/or adding a bunch of caveats. That's only because he's an extraordinarily meticulous thinker and presenter.
Whoa, let's get something straight here: if you have multiple 2-hour chunks of time every day to watch videos people post here and I don't, one of us is definitely lazy but it isn't me.
Weird how you can't read. This argument is fallacious as fuck lol. Keep asking for others to do your thinking and researching for you. It's been working out great so far for the population at large with legacy media gatekeepers. The only delusional loser here is you bud :)
It's summarized in the title. Also, if you don't have 2 hours to listen to it, why do you even comment?
Who would care about your comment, when they know you didn't watch it? :D If you find yourself again commenting under a post you know nothing about, it would be wise to delete your comment. Free advice in under 2 hours for you.
He had Peter Houtez on like 3 times before they launched the scamdemic. I remember thinking this was the most boring human ever, why would he have him as a guest. Little did I know.
They need people to believe it in order for it to happen, because there will be no AI as in the movies, but if people willfully surrender themselves to NWOGPT9 believing it to be better than a human, the same thing is achieved for those who think of themselves as the rulers of humanity
That Joe is compromised is certainly a problem, but the more subtle problem, I've come to realize, is that people put their faith in such people and outsource their discernment to them. This is the same whether it's Anderson Cooper or Sean Hannity or Joe Rogan or Graham Hancock. You just get different helpings of sugar with different ones to help very similar medicines go down.
Of the top three far and away most important researchers I know of on the Internet, one of them gets stuff wrong all the time and another I am certain is a disinformation agent.
The third, Mark Passio, is the only one whose work I could recommend without being very selective and/or adding a bunch of caveats. That's only because he's an extraordinarily meticulous thinker and presenter.
Such is the role of the sheep and the shepherd. But there are so many wolves in sheep's clothing...
Despite his direct connection to Alex Joes, Greg Reese is also pretty legit.
Can someone who already watched the video please summarize it's contents? I don't have 2 hours to listen to this
Use faster playback speed and listen in chunks of time. Stop being lazy you handshake fuck.
Whoa, let's get something straight here: if you have multiple 2-hour chunks of time every day to watch videos people post here and I don't, one of us is definitely lazy but it isn't me.
What a delusional loser
You can treat it like a podcast. Listen while doing chores, working, or exercising. I listen to videos while coding.
Weird how you can't read. This argument is fallacious as fuck lol. Keep asking for others to do your thinking and researching for you. It's been working out great so far for the population at large with legacy media gatekeepers. The only delusional loser here is you bud :)
"weird how you can't read" - weird how me showing you for the retard you truly are somehow makes me illiterate
It's summarized in the title. Also, if you don't have 2 hours to listen to it, why do you even comment?
Who would care about your comment, when they know you didn't watch it? :D If you find yourself again commenting under a post you know nothing about, it would be wise to delete your comment. Free advice in under 2 hours for you.
People are going to look at you name, and not bother with your threads. Good job!
You have dementia
You again? Go be lazy somewhere else, please. #blocked
Once again: if all you do is sit in your mom's basement watching videos on the internet, then YOU are the lazy one.
He had Peter Houtez on like 3 times before they launched the scamdemic. I remember thinking this was the most boring human ever, why would he have him as a guest. Little did I know.
He also loves to promote the inevitable ai takeover of humanity.
They need people to believe it in order for it to happen, because there will be no AI as in the movies, but if people willfully surrender themselves to NWOGPT9 believing it to be better than a human, the same thing is achieved for those who think of themselves as the rulers of humanity
I knew this would be a Matthew North video. He was the only person exposing Joe until he disappeared from the internet.
Also has always made fun of chemtrails. Even had a show called "Joe questions everything" where he debunked conspiracy theories.
This young researcher has done incredible work exposing Joe Rogan with examples from his podcasts and connections within the Joe Rogan podcast system.
If only more could prepare so well for a conspiracy topic!