"how about that folks!" - baseball announcer
Elon is a fraud.. he takes orders from Macron (WEF Agent)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
There is no conditions for revolution to exterminate daemon posessed/reptiloids/globalists/whatever TPTB yet. And to prepare succesfull revolution you need exactly what you name circlejerks to find out what exactly happening, who exactly have to be exterminated, how to deal with sheeple and so on.
Doing shit without a plan is a highway to failure. To create a plan to change something you need at least somebody to create that plan in the first place.
"Doing something" without any result is senseless. You could vote for one of their puppets, protest, even kill some puppets, but that will not change anything at all or just make things worse, as anybody could observe in realtime.
You need to do the thing that will give a desired and guaranteed result, not "something". IDK, how in your mind such simple and obvious concept you obviously use on the daily basis somehow does not expand to the social/political issues.
You don't do "something" to cook food or clean the house. You don't do "something" when you drive a car or fixing plumbing. You do "something" only to entertain yourself when you are bored and have no useful things to do.
So, suggesting doing "something" you literally equalise your desire to resist TPTB with self-entertainment.
There's a reason why the elites ordered stooges and moles to hijack Occupy Wall Street and turn the discussion to race and gender debates.
If you're so adamant in that "something", you wouldn't had been accepted bank notes as viable currency in the first place.
They can't censor anything without fiat money from things like the UN backing their asses.
The reason is simple. Those who participate in Occupy didn't have a plan, so do absolutely nothing to prevent infiltration and hijacking their movement.
You just perfectly illustrated what I am talking about.
This will be the correct sentence. Just like that.
They could only limit access of sheeple that use social crap and can't think by themselves to some information to some extent.
You could do censorship only if you fully control all ways of information spreading. Either it is an information source (recall that stupid Twitter Files with blacked out email addresses, names and all that shit), either it is an information pathway.
For now they do not control all information sources and all information pathways. And hardly will be able in the foreseen future. So, censorship is in the heads of target audience, really. If in your search for the truth you can't turn away from beloved twitter and look for other things like i2p or independent servers, then it is you who help TPTB to censor yourself.
Abandon relying on TPTB controlled services and software, and that's all.
And they almost did.
Remember most of the people who supposedly tell the "Truth" who are somehow in Havard or Oxford are shills or honeypots. Same with Marxists.
You're not finding any of the sites that do tell the truth now unless you have a VVVIP invitation. Get over it.
Then how we are talking now?
May be you just confuse information exchange with access to the audience of whole population?
The latter never was the case, so nothing changed at all. If somebody mistakenly thought that using some Twitter/Facebook/whatever one could get that access, than he was fundamentally wrong. No single centralized social platform was created to provide such access. They all was created to use users as assets for trade and business.
So, I don't see many changes from the point of control over internet. As they didn't knew what internet was, so they dont't understand what internet is. Funny that those people who was brought to internet in recent decades do not understand that too.
Only one thing really annoying me - the growth of information garbage produced by arrogant and ignorant users. This could really become a problem, especially if sheeple will be forced to master something different from corporate web they use now, but I don't think it will happen in closest future.