This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Building 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w
The points brought up in the video are:
• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”**
This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0
• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”**
Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.
Truthers deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris
• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”**
This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.
Remember, the truth doesn’t fear investigation.
Tower 7 had books in it. Ancient valuable books that are now missing. I can only find links about a gold heist, but researchers that were using those books bring it up once in a while.
Hell yeah now this is how you schizo post
Elaborate?
I can't always find the things I learn listening to podcasts, but usually sharing helps others pitch in.
Im saying that what you said is such an out of pocket claim that its something that a schizophrenic person would say. And just because a podcast says something doesnt make it true.
Then my comment isn't for you
He should have proally elaborated more, maybe linked some sources. Hes not wrong. I cant vouch for anything about ancient books.
But there was gold, and there were valuable books.
Its really strange, I could have swore back then that they claimed the gold vaporized, but according to newer articles, all of the gold was recovered. However the amounts keep changing. Was it 200, or was it 500 million.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-nov-01-mn-64176-story.html
https://www.wfmynews2.com/article/news/local/2-wants-to-know/there-was-500-million-worth-of-gold-silver-and-several-hundred-pounds-of-confiscated-drugs-in-the-rubble-of-the-wtc/83-beba24ef-cc41-4f74-91dc-4a1b0c3e6276
However, the gold wasnt under tower 7. What was in tower 7 was more important to the powers that be, than gold.
You can source the information yourself, looking for it brings me to a 100 pages about why tower 7 collapsed. But of course if I dont find it, you wont believe it right?
https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=130645&page=1
Convenient eh.
The mind loops you drones have to do to avoid the truth. As more and more time goes on, people are going to forget what happened that day. I never will. I watched the twin towers fall and the very first thought that ran through my head?
That looks like every controlled demolition I have ever seen.
https://www.nist.gov/pao/questions-and-answers-about-nist-wtc-7-investigation
Trust us guys, this one building burned differently because it was the only one we built differently.
It was actually 5.4 seconds guys, not 3.9. Totally fucking fake.
Do you hear yourself?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_czyNCNhDI&
This is just ridiculous that people look at this and think it fell because there were some fires on the lower floors, when all these buildings were designed for fires and even plane strikes. Oh wait, thats right this one was designed differently of course.
The fucking mental gymnastics, just trust your godamn gut and what your eyes tell you.
Even michalus's comments about ancient books may be onto something.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/05/from-iraq-and-back-via-911-and-harvard/
Just strange, not the only story about ancient artifacts either.