Mutant babies at 10%... Totally normal.
(news-us.feednews.com)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
from reverse transcription of the mrna shot?? . probably from the women getting the shot while pregnant went through umbilical cord. I dont think its the eggs theyre there at birth could be from men getting the shot too since sperm is made continually.
There's also been a recent discovery that women on BC their whole life have done themselves harm. It's could be a multiple of things combined. This is another situation we won't have answers to for a very long time.
I'm concerned about having kids with a vaxxed sperm. Do you think if they do IVF technique of removing everything extra (all the junk crap ) that it will remove any negtaive effects, like the spike proteins etc? Have you seen any studies where there is a change in the germ line from males? Females, I assume would be more influencial because they have to incubate for 9 months.
Participating in the study means you, and your children are the data.
I only thought of birth control on the lower conception viability after they are off it. that could make sense that even if the embryo is received that the messed with hormonal system of the mom could cause problem in development.
The data has just started to be looked at. Basically putting prepubescent girls on BC for acne wasn't a good idea, but no-one told them they were the drug trials.
doctors are baffled....
And since they just discovered this (post mrna vaxx) they presumably don't have prior natural data to compare it.
Also, I archived this. Good find!
https://archive.is/gqt8t
Wouldn't the non vaxxed be the group to study against? This article is specifically about issues that won't show up until later. There are parent that think they have normal babies, and they're going to make them worse with the insanely new dense childhood vaccine schedule.
https://news-us.feednews.com/news/detail/844b29a85aee1426e2feda8f85e56bc1?client=news
Remember this though? "A New York Times investigation earlier this year reported that many of these tests frequently have false-positive results for rare conditions. Positive results were wrong 80 percent of the time or more for things like Cri-du-chat syndrome." How many babies are aborted for thinking it was deformed? https://www.theverge.com/2022/4/19/23032608/fda-prenatal-blood-tests-false-results#:~:text=A%20New%20York%20Times%20investigation%20earlier%20this%20year,time%20or%20more%20for%20things%20like%20Cri-du-chat%20syndrome.
That seems very suspect. Also you're pointing to pre birth, and this study is post birth. More suspect than the climate change causing heart issues.
Considering this was a test specifically to test for what wouldn't be known for years. We will have to wait, and see. I am curious which tests were used from this article though.
This article is specific to post mRNA mothers receiving while pregnant. The only valid comparison is babies who's mother's didn't participate in the trial.
I'm not sure if that's correct. Same years vaxxed vs unvaxxed makes more sense to me. And, that's the point of this study.
I said it in another comment, but there are parents that think they have normal babies. They're going to give them the regular childhood vaccine schedule which is 4x what it was when I was growing up. The chances of the child having complications will continue to go up.
It is birth mutations at birth after the mothers took mRNA vaccines while pregnant.
Birth defects at birth is relevant. Especially for a mRNAs that caused so many miscarriages. At birth vaccine vs non vaccine is the relevant data. Because it is the only measure of how harmful the mRNA was to the unborn child.
Shortly after "smooth brain" became newspeak for "retard" someone I know had a child with Lissencephaly and everything started to click.
You are posting AI generated content. Did you read it before posting?
You are making nonsense comments. Did YOU read the article, or is it above your reading level?
It's feednews. You don't know what that is, do you?
sources are listed on page.
You didn't read obviously or it is, in fact, above your reading level.
Feed news means I read the article in my browser's newsfeed. See how that works? Sometimes I can click to a site, sometimes it just imports the article. This was an imported article.