When you read this, do you agree with the author? Because I think people that only look at equipment when they need it will end up with subpar products. And, I think AMD will be able to take the market share based off of the bad will intel will have.
Intel isn't going to be a trusted name long enough for that to matter.
https://www.pcgamer.com/intels-ditching-the-i-in-core-i5i7i9-and-will-stop-calling-out-chip-generations/
When you read this, do you agree with the author? Because I think people that only look at equipment when they need it will end up with subpar products. And, I think AMD will be able to take the market share based off of the bad will intel will have.
They will just buy AMD at that point. What's important is they are setting up the infrastructure, know-how and people.
If Intel loses its market share, they can do a merger or buyout and replace the logo on the building. But the building and the equipment would stay.
They don't care if the market stagnates afterwards, as long as they have monopoly they are good to go.
Rebranding doesn't work on nerds. They'll remember intel can't be trusted. Just reading their intentions is enough to skip their product.