Ted Kaczynski Dead At 81
(abcnews.go.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.
The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.
If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.
We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence: it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can't predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.
In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM
I thought they executed him YEARS ago. That's pretty weird.
cause of death?
All anyone knows is his TED talk bombed.
he had a terminal illness if I remember correctly, cancer probably.
F
In honor of Uncle Ted's passing, I post this to remind everyone that not everything is as we've been told:
The Unabomber was another Psy-op (25-page PDF)
If this comes as news, I hope that at least at this point it doesn't come as a surprise. The paper is by disinfo agent Miles Mathis, so all the usual caveats apply.
A couple of little factoids to add to the material in the paper are that Judy Clarke (of fake OJ trial fame) served as his lawyer, and Merrick Garland (of corrupt DOJ fame) oversaw the Unabom case as Deputy AG. What a coincidence!
The problem with Mathis is that with him almost every event of significance to humanity that he has examined is a highly orchestrated psyop done with the utmost care and precision. And every picture he examines has been doctored, though he's not sure how, but only very few talented people like him can tell. Even obscure pictures, that hardly anyone has even seen, the doctoring of which would have no effect on human history whatsoever. Masterfully doctored.
When he's right, he's right. But when he's wrong he just he can't admit it. Or he is just writing fiction for the hell of it. Or perhaps for a nefarious purpose? Either way, can't take him seriously.
"Miles Mathis" is most assuredly a disinformation project, as stated. And as I hope everyone understands but seemingly very few do, all disinformation sources must give you some truth. For the astute, even the lies and omissions are valuable, since one can deduce what They wish everyone to think or to steer everyone away from.
The water is too deep for the vast majority, even of those who fancy themselves "conspiracy theorists". Notwithstanding that, I'll still tell people that a deep end of the pool exists.
Most will never venture there for whatever reasons they care to tell themselves and others. Some will go out, but will metaphorically drown. A handful will learn to swim, just as I learned. In my opinion, we need all the swimmers we can get.
There was some former cia guy , name slips my mind, Admitting the use of some truth and some lies when operating interationally. What you are basically outlining is finding the truth in the "truth".
Right, exactly.
See, I thought what made conspiracy theorists different was that they were doing what I was doing (and which is simply what I thought everyone should be doing): using the resources of logic, judgement, and a knowledge base of facts that you had previously built up to validate new facts and feed them back in to your knowledge base. Turns out, that's pretty much not what happens.
We all criticize normies because they get their "truths" from the mainstream. like picking books off a shelf. They are allowed a limited selection, so some choose the book labeled "Fox" over the book labeled "MSNBC", but the Elites control the books on the shelf.
I was surprised and dismayed to determine--really only very recently--that almost all "conspiracy theorists" operate the same way, just with a different set of books. They pick books off the shelf labeled "Joe Rogan" or "Clif High" or "The Greek" or whatever. Some more shadowy versions of Rupert Murdoch control or influence the vast majority of what goes on this shelf. But see how it's just an enhanced version of the other thing?
To me, a real seeker with any hope of finding out what the hell is really going on must to be able to recognize admissions of truth when spoken by a known liar, reject falsehoods and errors from their own most valued sources, and accept truths even when rejected by every other person. IDK exactly what qualities it takes to do this, but it seems clear to me that it's what we should all be shooting for.
You really do need a hefty self awareness of your own thinking. Recognise what you don't know. Hold a pinch of doubt so you don't blind yourself by believing something absolutely. Critically reevaluate presumptions you hold.
Preventing discussion is really the only impediment; there is usually someone that will present things in a manner that warrants your contemplation.
Mathis has always given off weird vibes. I've always gotten the feeling he worked for someone to muddle the conspiracy waters and plant doubt. He certainly had his share of ego too.
I'm not sure if it was a psy-op.
I just know that his manifesto is actually very intelligent, prescient, and mostly accurate
Too bad more people like him aren't blowing up corrupt government employees
That's kinda how I feel about it. Give em some god damned ACCOUNTABILITY. If someone sends you a bomb, you're a fucking dick and if you think someone MAY send you a bomb in the mail, fucking CHANGE and stop being a fucking dick. End of story. It's not hard.
The only government employees left are ones that masked and got the jew poison shot. They can all die for all i care.