Remember that when the khokhols cry.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
Are you genetically dumb. You quote stuff. But I don't think you read it. I think it just floats around in your head, and out pops the bullshit.
The dam was hit by shells last year. Like the bridge was hit by shells and missiles. Both sides blamed each other.
The damage done caused water to run off of it. The water was already at peak capacity and overflowing. The bridge wasn't repaired since being blowout in a section.
Why you, while trying to look objective, forgot to mention that it was at peak capacity solely because Ukrainian authorities purposedly opened gates on Dnepropetrovsk dam few days before?
Also, you forget to mention that water running over floodgates is a normal working mode of floodgates because they are designed to do exactly that - pass excess wated over the top, so adjusting horisontal floodgate position you could adjust the cross-section of the flow and so keep water level in reservoir at desired level. They can't broke just because water flow over them. Only if somebody damaged floodgates previously, and everybody perfectly know that it was Urkaine/West who shelled dam a lot and openly admitted hitting exactly floodgates.
Aslo, you somehow "missed" the link and quote I alresdy gave you with a proof of such intentions:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/12/29/ukraine-offensive-kharkiv-kherson-donetsk/
Your lame attempts to draw aside the full and sole responsibility of Ukraine/West authorities for this disaster looks miserable. And you didn't even bothered to find out how HPP dams made and work.
What floodgates? They don't allow the ships through. Previously. So the gates that power the hydro electricity? So they didn't release the overflow. It was spilling, previously. But they weren't operating this entire time? Dumb dumb dumb. As suspected.
The upper dam is maintained. Tell me what the weather was? It releases the excess automatically, like in rainfall. Because this is what the system is designed to do, pass the overflow down the river, collecting it in the reservoir. It doesn't need a conspiracy. But there you are rubbing your hands together, hatching a plot.
What are you on about. I know how the dam works without the ships and the beaver genocide.
The counter offensive you've linked. Except. The invasion started as a big feint in the North. That huge convey was diversionary. Combined into a lot of inexperience. Problematical they didn't know what they were completely facing. Where they secured footing was along a land corridor. It probably still sought terms. Who knows that complete agenda but there's far more tactics at play and overall agenda on a bigger stage than the proxy. However the media on both sides has been seeped in propaganda in warfare that has shifting dynamics over a colossal country. What was Bakhmut as example, who used it and why for what. It had another purpose outside of the misinformation. The biggest problem this conflict has had is a real lack of dominating air superiority. It has sought territory over the complete degradation of an enemy, because it has been fighting its own and it is defending itself from far more risk.
The territory won back then wasn't quite the complete forward positions. No. It gained smaller towns and faster retreated off bigger feints. I suspect Kherson was problematic. Because Odessa hosted far more. It didn't capture Karkiv either. The main fighting did what then. It was gaining the land corridor via the Southern Oblasts East of the Dnipro, while engaging against the fortified line in Donetsk and Luhansk. Now however it has entrenched as it grinds away at an enemy's resolve.
The geography of gain has also followed which landmarks? More than the river. It's obvious.
But the dam I am not convinced. You spew provocation. Except it's there anyway. It hasn't changed much. The funding and escalation is there already.
It changed access. Objectively who does this favour? It could be Ukraine if Russia still seeks the rest of the coast. However not in the immediate future.
Floodgates that was damaged by Ukraine/West. Floodgates that adjust level of water in reservoir by spilling it over to provide necessary pressure on turbines.
Locks for ships is separate system in that dam. AFAIK, they are intact.
There is ALWAYS overflow over the floodgates. Because Dnepr flow is too huge to utilise it in whole in turbines and because you need to adjust water level to provide necessary pressure on turbines that depends on the water level in reservoir.
Do you have at least middle-school education? Or when in US students solve that problems about pool and tubes?
You still didn't bother to find out anything about Soviet HPPs, weather, precipitation at the moment and so on.
You do not want to find necessary information for purpose? You are afraid that there is possibility that somebody could eventually physically press you about lying and you want to have an excuse that you knew nothing about HPP dams so it was just ignorance and not purposeful lies?
Come on, you are looking worse and wosre with every next miserable reply.
You've gone crazy. It's autism. I answered that question. They don't let ships through. Tell me what ships went up that part of the river? The river had freaking islands and beavers. Ships. You sack of rocks. Barges perhaps. Not ocean liners. Or nuclear submarines firing the torpedoes. They could stealth all the way into Kiev. Through the locks. It wasn't deep enough. Dumbass.
They powered the hydro turbines venting the overflow. The overflow collecting downstream into the reservoir. The reservoir not being maintained. Because wahaaa Ukraine did it.
The rest of your gerbil is repeating what I stated.
I don't need to look at your ships. Seriously the weather was bad all winter and much of spring and the reservoir was quite full and at capacity. Because what, Ukraine did it? Objectively why. So the nuclear submarines wouldn't lock into Kiev?