Remember that when the khokhols cry.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
You've gone crazy. It's autism. I answered that question. They don't let ships through. Tell me what ships went up that part of the river? The river had freaking islands and beavers. Ships. You sack of rocks. Barges perhaps. Not ocean liners. Or nuclear submarines firing the torpedoes. They could stealth all the way into Kiev. Through the locks. It wasn't deep enough. Dumbass.
They powered the hydro turbines venting the overflow. The overflow collecting downstream into the reservoir. The reservoir not being maintained. Because wahaaa Ukraine did it.
The rest of your gerbil is repeating what I stated.
I don't need to look at your ships. Seriously the weather was bad all winter and much of spring and the reservoir was quite full and at capacity. Because what, Ukraine did it? Objectively why. So the nuclear submarines wouldn't lock into Kiev?
What? Again, What the fuck are you talking about?
Ships do not pass through floodgates of the dam. Ships passes the dam through a separate lock gates in separate channel.
What the fuck are you talking about? Why didn't you just see some documentary for dummies about how HPP works? I think there should be some on YT.
Who told you that rubbish about "weather was bad"? Who exactly? Where did you get that nonsense? It was absolutely standard spring in Russia, nothing extreme or unusual at all. It was not even very snowy winter this year.
Ukraine/West created that disaster. All your stupid and sad attemtps to shift responsibility away only makes that more solid.
The barges, had a lock, separate to the dam. They were barges and boat tours. The lock is still accessible. The dam however has run aground.
I really don't know what you're complaining about?
It's Soviet river dam. The power wasn't working.
The counter offensive was delayed. Weather was bad. It rained a lot. It rains even more in the Ukraine. Along the Dnipro.
Who blew up the road and railroad first?
We're repeating ourselves with vague talking points. You're literally going around in circles. I am taking the mick. Because of the probability. You won't convince me. I really didn't care when making an assessment. It remains unchanged objectively.
Who gains more at this point? Who is to blame? At this point it's simply ironic. It was expected and an occurrence. It hasn't changed much more. Except defensive positions. They gain more. Unless the attacker gains something else?
What? Has Crimea's water become affected. By the next dam perhaps. It places the nuclear reactor at risk. See, a better argument against Ukraine. Not nonsense. But this is not significant currently and won't be anytime soon. By that time a pumping station and additional channels are operational.
What counteroffensive? You mean suicidal PR action of Ukrainian government to please their Western masters?
Who told you that bullshit? Where did you get that information? Did you ever checked that information?
Why do you try to whitewash NWO bastards? Why you did that in the way that completely discredit your point of view, thinking out complete bullshit?
When you count probability from the complete bullshit you get just another bullshit. Garbage in - garbage out.
You're speculating. But yes the WW1 charge and prooobing. Remarkablely bullshit.
As I said this conflict has been fought wrong. By both sides.
It doesn't have the same objectives as other warfare. Whatever those obnoxious reasons are. Where it doesn't seek the annihilation of an enemy's core systems and command and infrastructure. It tries to play capture the flag. When those systems are hit both blame each other, name calling.
There has been no dominating air superiority. It instead welcomes even more weaponry into its axis, as it plays wargames. Constantly raising the ante of the next bigger gun.
It ignored key captures to procure other territory, it now seeks to defend. Where it welcomes an enemy if it can cause it to degrade their eventual capability.
It never closed the borders. Because it would drag other conflict into it, but it ironically does anyway because it hadn't.
It backed monkeys in every literal sense of the word compared to professional soldiers. Because it thinks to hamper an enemy if it spends even more on outfitting and funding them.
Why did this conflict even occur? Now it thinks to win it, when it has no defining objectives. Except that's mine because I said it.
I am sure there's more reasons.
Look it up. The river/delta and parts of Ukraine has much higher averages of rainfall than North above it Russia. It also has a lower temperature in certain areas.
I gave you a better reason than wahaaaa Ukraine did it because of the social justice for beavers.
The dam further up pressures the reactor and the reservoir, possibly affecting the Crimea as well. It can affect it. It possibly cannot be targeted, or the reactor is at risk. So it will have an affect on the water supply longterm and the reactor. It can effectively shut it down.