Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

10
() fLeRf pRo0F!
posted 2 years ago by csehszlovakze 2 years ago by csehszlovakze +13 / -3
46 comments share
46 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
▲ 0 ▼
– savman 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

The light from stars travels billions of light years only to be blocked by someone travelling to the other side of a flat earth. Makes total sense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– jack445566778899 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

The light from stars travels billions of light years

I don’t believe such things, but even if it were true - it wouldn’t change what i said or the demonstrable reality of it. No matter how far away the light source is - as you recede from it (or it from you) it will appear to converge with the horizon and eventually no longer be visible.

only to be blocked

You misunderstand, that is your view. You are the one who believes that the light is blocked by the “curve of the earth”.

In my view, the receding light is first apparently converged with the visible horizon (perspective / angular resolution), and ultimately refracted, convexly towards the surface, by the density gradient in our air.

Makes total sense.

It does when you understand it. However, making sense doesn’t make it (or anything) correct. Reality is stranger than fiction because fiction is obliged to possibility.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– savman 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

In my view, the receding light is first apparently converged with the visible horizon (perspective / angular resolution), and ultimately refracted, convexly towards the surface, by the density gradient in our air.

Publish your research, show your empirical evidence and then have it reviewed by your peers. Once you do, you will be proven right and become the most famous person in the world.

Think of all the brave innovators who challenged the church and old-school ways that came before you. Copernicus, Galileo, at al, now YOU have an opportunity to be that person. Show the world your evidence and facts so everyone can once and for know how they have all been manipulated.

What are you waiting for?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– jack445566778899 -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

Publish your research

I “published” the conclusions of my research to you - just now...

Besides, what i’ve said is demonstrably observable for all to see. What better “publishment” can there be but trivially observable reality?

All objects, and the light from them - wether reflected or self luminescent - do as i describe when receding.

show your empirical evidence and then have it reviewed by your peers

Again, there is no better empirical evidence than trivially observable reality. Go out and “review” my evidence for yourself. Science is about replication (validation), not the publishing racket.

Once you do, you will be proven right and become the most famous person in the world.

Lol. You massively overestimate peoples interest in such things. Virtually no one cares friend, because they are too busy slaving away to “earn” a crust.

Think of all the brave innovators who challenged the church and old-school ways that came before you

I like historical fiction as well, but it is important to remember that they are just stories.

so everyone can once and for know how they have all been manipulated.

No one requires to be “manipulated” in order to be wrong and to likewise be taught, from childhood, wrong things and repeat them. That happens naturally, without any intervention/manipulation.

What are you waiting for?

That is a good question to ask yourself. I am not waiting. I’m here sharing my views and conclusions. You are the one who won’t/can’t bother to validate them. As I said, most people don’t care about such things :(

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– savman 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I “published” the conclusions of my research to you - just now...

No, any fundamental 'discovery' that goes against the status quo must be published in scientific journals so that people smarter than you or I can review, critique, and debunk your claims. Watch the movie, The Theory of Everything, where Hawkings was laughed at, scoffed at, and told he was a loon, by the establishment. If you don't have the guts to do this, then you are just a conspiracy theorist with nothing to show but the fact that you are a gutless coward and not serious.

Fuck, today it is so easy, just look at https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=scientific+paper+on+the+shape+of+the+earth&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart

Anyone can lay a claim that Jews control everything and that there is a secret cabal trying to hide the truth, well my friend, that is the true meaning of a conspiritard. You have nothing but your own paranoid delusions.

So put up or shut up. If you claim "I don't waste my time on those publishing rackets" that is the language of a coward. For you to say such a thing is just you admitting you really don't have the intelligence to go toe to toe with them. If you are so much smarter than they are, then put it in a paper and publish it. It's free for fuck sake.

Every flat earther is a fucking idiot, simply because they knowingly have nothing to show but some clown and a YouTube video.

To date, not one of you FE's has ever done anything more than make fake assumptions without any evidence whatsoever.

https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/publication-recognition/how-to-submit-a-paper-for-publication-in-a-journal/

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy