Where did you find it? I'm very curious because legalese nitpicks words, and everyday words have different a meaning in legal contexts. As it stands, suing a person into compliance because they can't afford any more legal fees is what I see when I look at this case. And, that's a tried and true legal method.
I'd like to understand why you see something different.
He wasn't fired. He resigned, so he would be beholden to any non competition agreement he signed.
That's not what the article says.
Yeah but those are the facts.
Where did you find it? I'm very curious because legalese nitpicks words, and everyday words have different a meaning in legal contexts. As it stands, suing a person into compliance because they can't afford any more legal fees is what I see when I look at this case. And, that's a tried and true legal method.
I'd like to understand why you see something different.
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=james+o%27keefe+resigns
Facts are facts no matter how much you deny them.