The early church fathers believe that Jesus wrote in the dirt the sins of those who wanted to stone the woman caught in adultery.
Anyway, Socrates didn't write anything either, but influenced his followers who did. It's hardly the problem that OP's poem's author thinks it is.
Edit to add the Budda never wrote anything down either.
"How many times do I need to repeat, 'Jews are of their father, the devil, and are the synagogue of satan'? I love you all, but... Are you people fucking daft???"
a) anointed one implies ones RITE (write) of passage through the birth-channel.
b) foundation of "what" implies energy; because what can be outside ENERGY (inherent/internal power)?
c) others suggest "write" to tempt one to ignore perceivable rite, which also represents ones right within LAW (land/air/water)...
wrote in the sand
SAND, noun - "any mass or collection of fine particles of stone"...collecting together implies contained within; being within implies being set free (will of choice). Containment represents ones mind in ignorance of ones position as the free center within a dominating surrounding.
chisel is still
All that is implies within motion...others suggest "still" as the inversion thereof.
admitted in law
Natural law admits (inception) and concludes (death) each ones life sentence.
Why did the Logos write nothing at all?
Because "nothing" can only exist as the suggested word (logos), hence within ones consenting mind (logic/reason).
there's something amiss
some-thing (partial) can only exist within everything (whole)...can something be amiss within everything or could it be that something misses what everything offers (perceivable), because it ignores it for something else (suggested)?
something amiss with a book
Binding oneself by consent to a suggested book by others tempts one to miss everything outside that bond, hence being spell-bound in-between covers...
the main character never partook
Only the minor (life) partakes (to take a part); never the main (inception towards death)...which only gives whole towards each partial.
write wise
WISE, adjective [Greek; to know]...the written (suggested) tempts one to ignore knowledge (perceivable).
Sleight of hand: "wise guys" are the "book-keepers"...not the readers.
What empire doesn't propagate lies?
a) emperor (motion) to empire (momentum aka balance) to dynasty (choice)
b) ignoring perceivable need (change) for wanting (truth) vs not wanting (lies) suggested...propagates ignorance.
knew they would change
Knowing implies perceiving moving differences within constant change as inspiration for adaptation.
stuck in the head
Perceivable inspiration goes through ones mind/memory; while suggested information tempts one to hold onto. Need to let go, while struggling with want to hold onto... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LH6MstVxehQ
The early church fathers believe that Jesus wrote in the dirt the sins of those who wanted to stone the woman caught in adultery.
Anyway, Socrates didn't write anything either, but influenced his followers who did. It's hardly the problem that OP's poem's author thinks it is. Edit to add the Budda never wrote anything down either.
Apparently, he may have written with a finger to parallel writing the 10 commandments
"How many times do I need to repeat, 'Jews are of their father, the devil, and are the synagogue of satan'? I love you all, but... Are you people fucking daft???"
except in aramaic.
a) anointed one implies ones RITE (write) of passage through the birth-channel.
b) foundation of "what" implies energy; because what can be outside ENERGY (inherent/internal power)?
c) others suggest "write" to tempt one to ignore perceivable rite, which also represents ones right within LAW (land/air/water)...
SAND, noun - "any mass or collection of fine particles of stone"...collecting together implies contained within; being within implies being set free (will of choice). Containment represents ones mind in ignorance of ones position as the free center within a dominating surrounding.
All that is implies within motion...others suggest "still" as the inversion thereof.
Natural law admits (inception) and concludes (death) each ones life sentence.
Because "nothing" can only exist as the suggested word (logos), hence within ones consenting mind (logic/reason).
some-thing (partial) can only exist within everything (whole)...can something be amiss within everything or could it be that something misses what everything offers (perceivable), because it ignores it for something else (suggested)?
Binding oneself by consent to a suggested book by others tempts one to miss everything outside that bond, hence being spell-bound in-between covers...
Only the minor (life) partakes (to take a part); never the main (inception towards death)...which only gives whole towards each partial.
WISE, adjective [Greek; to know]...the written (suggested) tempts one to ignore knowledge (perceivable).
Sleight of hand: "wise guys" are the "book-keepers"...not the readers.
a) emperor (motion) to empire (momentum aka balance) to dynasty (choice)
b) ignoring perceivable need (change) for wanting (truth) vs not wanting (lies) suggested...propagates ignorance.
Knowing implies perceiving moving differences within constant change as inspiration for adaptation.
Perceivable inspiration goes through ones mind/memory; while suggested information tempts one to hold onto. Need to let go, while struggling with want to hold onto... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LH6MstVxehQ