BREAKING: Elon announces new Twitter CEO
(media.scored.co)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Yeah, she's horrible. Imp has a whole laundry list on what a swamp monster she is.
More than that
She is an Executive Chair at the World Economic Forum
Jan 2019 - Present
Yaccarino is the Chairman of the WEF's Taskforce on Future of Work and sits on the WEF's Media, Entertainment and Culture Industry Governors Steering Committee. She is also highly engaged with the Value in Media initiative.
lol that's just a drop in the ocean for her resume
TheImpossible1 did a great write up of what a swamp monster she is
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/16b6Dhyyw8/x/c/4TtrIM6rFfE
Elon is Agent Orange 2.0
Will Tucker stay on Twitter now?
IMO at least until he's censored and then he'll have to make a decision on where to move his platform, unless he bends the knee.
My gurss is they'll let him be free until he's sufficiently hooked and then begin the slow rug pull
Yeah, that's a good prediction and it's usually how it works out.
At the very least, we know this day is coming, and then we'll find out just how principled Tucker is.
For sure. To some extent I think he's too enmeshed in his way of life to be willing to sacrifice so my guess is he'll bend when the pressure starts. It's like what Morpheus said about red pilling people beyond a certain age, where in reality, age is just a proxy for a particular comfort level with a given lifestyle.
Tucker will bring people who dont use twitter there just to watch his little bits of news.
Source: https://nitter.nl/elonmusk/status/1657050349608501249
Awe man I was hoping this wasn’t true . But be aware commies repeat things. I am not sure if they are able to be creative on their own. I thought this may have been what Twitter was now I am almost sure. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundred_Flowers_Campaign
I took the time to study LindaYacc's wiki page, looking for all the usual red flags of a spook or one of "Them". Fifteen of the seventeen references are from today or yesterday. The two older ones are:
"Trump Names NBCU's Linda Yaccarino to the President's Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition"
"Penn State alum and NBCU President of Ad Sales Linda Yaccarino to speak at graduation"
Less than alarming, I would say.
But my point is this: every single person who considers themselves a "conspiracy theorist" simply sees some reference to the WEF and their dick gets as hard as diamond, as if they've discovered something vital. And like most times your dick gets hard, you stop thinking.
It is through this flaw that conspiracists can and are led around. They know such people love to think they're "in the know", so They just give you something to know.
What good comes from the WEF that would require us to more digging?
FWIW, TheImpossible1 compiled a bunch links demonstrating just how bad she is, so I'd say we're far more informed than someone who just goes to Wikipedia for their research.
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/16b6Dhyyw8/x/c/4TtrIM6rFfE
When I see everyone running in one direction, I always tend to pause and look in the other direction. Doesn't mean the lemmings are all wrong, but I do notice only a handful have enough presence of mind about them to do as I do. Or to get the point I made in the last post. Or to get the point I'm repeating in this one.
Seems to me this acute lack of wits is an even bigger problem than one "WEF member" on a service no one is making you or anyone else use. (<-- Well, there's another point the lackwits will not understand.)
But please do keep insisting, because it will hammer my points home for those who are alert.
I understand where you're coming from, but I don't think the WEF is a good example. Also, you calling them lemmings and lackwits just makes you look like a douchebag, which I think is a point your last sentence hammers home.
BTW You might not want to use Wikipedia for your political research.
You might want to think about not posting what every other lackwit on r/conspiracy is posting. I doubt this point will hit home.
Because actually, I think you're going to do what you're going to do. And I plainly see the problem with that but I suspect you won't because you can't. In any case, calling other people douchebags is a lot less effort, and far more comforting to one's worldview.
Final point, I have found that knowing when to agree and when to disagree with Wikipedia, or any other source, is reasoning of a higher level than most are capable. Thanks for the low-level insult disguised as a useless attempt at advice.
Shall we just leave it here or would you like more?