It's nigger tier logic to say "you're retarded" or "you're stupid" which implies what the other person is saying is wrong, rather than just demonstrating how they are wrong.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Intelligent people come to a basic expectation when processing other people.
Generally they can be quickly categorized into capability based groups.
So, you measure people using a standard process and place them accordingly.
Given this simplistic manner of approach, you can expect a certain fail rate, some people will need to be moved from one group to another as you continue to run tests.
Using simple terms and categories are a good conveyance to help the one in question to understand how they have been ranked. The usage of this is one has the ability to display a reasoning to work towards a change in rank.
If you have been called a stupid retard, then you should review the content at hand and review all the related inputs, do your best to cover all axis before returning to attempt the test again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Umc9ezAyJv0
Eat shit lefty, not gonna load some lame link.
OK. So just go and ask ChatGPT the following Question:
And then come back here and cut and paste it's reply into the window. Which doesn't match your current demeanor. Kind of like all your posts today. For some reason.
Stay classy, you low effort drunk!
more useless leftism, what is the point to reading the crap you scribble?
There is none.
Beat it lefty.
a) what comes first...one person or a composition of people?
b) does composition (people) happens automatically or is there a manual input required (person)?
c) what if composing person into "community" of people can be achieved by suggesting a person to consent to "commune-ism", hence collectivizing each person into a people (we the people).
d) what if a person is processed PER (by) SONOS (sound)?
a) if this (inception towards death) generates that (life) into itself, then does that represent a category (contained under a genus) or free unit (partial) within genus (whole)?
b) does the ongoing natural order CATA (against) AGORA (public assembly) or does it disassemble itself into temporary chaos? What if being one implies being one part within whole, hence neither assembled together, nor in conflict with other ones?
c) what if the few suggest categories to tempt the consenting many to put themselves into an exponential number of mental and physical cattle-pens...all by free will of choice? Why is it so hard these days to get out of a category others suggested one to be in?