In what way would automated algorithms hurt anything that isn't already?
Within the only way (inception towards death) continued ignorance of natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested) depletes life faster...
The so called bots can respond quicker with regurgitated suggestions towards a majority lacking more and more resistance to it. How long have the few conditioned the many to accept automated help-hotlines, while squeezing the resistance out of those waiting to be connected to a real human?
As a run off what has happened? I could answer. Every mental and neurological disorder blights humanity. Faster becoming physical. The automated lines do not handle capacity, lines take longer. They haven't solved anything except less jobs. Services are becoming much worse in every sector. Inflation hasn't stabilised it has skyrocketed. Crime has increased.
As far as employing them as bot driven prompts and scripts. They haven't produced shit. But they've probably incited it.
Every mental and neurological disorder blights humanity
a) what if reason (logic) allows others to pull ones nerve-strings (neuro), hence utilizing suggestion to puppeteer those consenting to reason over it?
b) how can there be a DIS- (lack of) within the natural ORDER (inception towards death)?
c) what if consenting to the suggestions of others puts one at DIS-EASE (blight), hence thinking one lacks something that others are withholding?
d) HUMAN implies as is perceivable; -ITY represents a state of being as suggested by others. Why would a human consent to a suggested -ity?
Faster becoming physical.
What if velocity (inception towards death) remains constant, while resistance (life) diminishes if one ignores to resist?
The automated lines do not handle capacity
a) what if manual (life) within auto (inception towards death) implies being able to handle ones contained mind (containment aka capacity)?
b) what if the few trick the many with suggested choke-points to want to progress faster? Are there choke-points for the living within the process of dying? Does progressing faster within the process of dying benefits the living?
They haven't solved anything
What if it's about distracting problem (life) from solution (inception towards death)? Seeking solutions and resisting being dissolved...which one represents the foundation of being alive?
Services are becoming much worse in every sector.
a) SECTOR (seco; to divide) SERVICE (servitium; work by compulsion)...if inception towards death represents the force of compulsion, and each life represents the division within, then does one need to work for others or for the sustenance of self?
b) why does suggested convenience lead to perceivable inconvenience? Could it be that convenience tempts one to ignore resisting (living) inconvenience (process of dying)?
Inflation hasn't stabilized it has skyrocketed
a) if balance represents the stable foundation for ones free will of choice, then ignoring to balance skyrockets ones instability (imbalance).
b) what exits in-between inflation (inception) and deflation (death)?
Crime has increased.
a) can natural law increase or decrease...or does it remain a stable; ongoing order for the temporary chaos within?
b) what if crime represents ones choice to resist the suggested laws by others? What so far prevented you from choosing to resist the suggested rules of behavior by others?
c) CRIME, noun - "to separate, to judge, to decree"...what if nature separates itself from whole (perceivable) into partial (perceiving), hence representing a division (decree) within and that which "just is" (justice) for those within?
Furthermore; what if LAW (land + air + water) exists as partial within whole self separating CRIME? Could suggested definitions be enough of a temptation to distract one from comprehending this?
They haven't produced shit
a) choosing want tempts one to want more, while choosing need grows ones resistance to want what one doesn't need.
b) PROD'UCT, noun [Latin productus, from produco.] -"that which is produced by nature"...perceivable whole produces perceiving partials...the suggestions of others tempts one to ignore that, hence falling for products placed within ones mind (product placement).
But they've probably incited it.
Suggested (fiction) incites one to ignore perceivable (reality).
Within the only way (inception towards death) continued ignorance of natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested) depletes life faster...
The so called bots can respond quicker with regurgitated suggestions towards a majority lacking more and more resistance to it. How long have the few conditioned the many to accept automated help-hotlines, while squeezing the resistance out of those waiting to be connected to a real human?
As a run off what has happened? I could answer. Every mental and neurological disorder blights humanity. Faster becoming physical. The automated lines do not handle capacity, lines take longer. They haven't solved anything except less jobs. Services are becoming much worse in every sector. Inflation hasn't stabilised it has skyrocketed. Crime has increased.
As far as employing them as bot driven prompts and scripts. They haven't produced shit. But they've probably incited it.
a) what if reason (logic) allows others to pull ones nerve-strings (neuro), hence utilizing suggestion to puppeteer those consenting to reason over it?
b) how can there be a DIS- (lack of) within the natural ORDER (inception towards death)?
c) what if consenting to the suggestions of others puts one at DIS-EASE (blight), hence thinking one lacks something that others are withholding?
d) HUMAN implies as is perceivable; -ITY represents a state of being as suggested by others. Why would a human consent to a suggested -ity?
What if velocity (inception towards death) remains constant, while resistance (life) diminishes if one ignores to resist?
a) what if manual (life) within auto (inception towards death) implies being able to handle ones contained mind (containment aka capacity)?
b) what if the few trick the many with suggested choke-points to want to progress faster? Are there choke-points for the living within the process of dying? Does progressing faster within the process of dying benefits the living?
What if it's about distracting problem (life) from solution (inception towards death)? Seeking solutions and resisting being dissolved...which one represents the foundation of being alive?
a) SECTOR (seco; to divide) SERVICE (servitium; work by compulsion)...if inception towards death represents the force of compulsion, and each life represents the division within, then does one need to work for others or for the sustenance of self?
b) why does suggested convenience lead to perceivable inconvenience? Could it be that convenience tempts one to ignore resisting (living) inconvenience (process of dying)?
a) if balance represents the stable foundation for ones free will of choice, then ignoring to balance skyrockets ones instability (imbalance).
b) what exits in-between inflation (inception) and deflation (death)?
a) can natural law increase or decrease...or does it remain a stable; ongoing order for the temporary chaos within?
b) what if crime represents ones choice to resist the suggested laws by others? What so far prevented you from choosing to resist the suggested rules of behavior by others?
c) CRIME, noun - "to separate, to judge, to decree"...what if nature separates itself from whole (perceivable) into partial (perceiving), hence representing a division (decree) within and that which "just is" (justice) for those within?
Furthermore; what if LAW (land + air + water) exists as partial within whole self separating CRIME? Could suggested definitions be enough of a temptation to distract one from comprehending this?
a) choosing want tempts one to want more, while choosing need grows ones resistance to want what one doesn't need.
b) PROD'UCT, noun [Latin productus, from produco.] -"that which is produced by nature"...perceivable whole produces perceiving partials...the suggestions of others tempts one to ignore that, hence falling for products placed within ones mind (product placement).
Suggested (fiction) incites one to ignore perceivable (reality).