This is all well and good, but why not take the next step? If certain people should be prosecuted, should he not name those whose responsibility it is but who are failing to do so? If he's not going to at least call them out now, would we have any reason to expect he would as President, let alone take action?
"Naming the Jew" seems to be a big deal around here, so it would seem "naming the prosecutor" would be absolutely required.
Many would fault me for it, but I'm still a believer in Trump partly due to that. Dig down far enough and you'll find a few researchers saying that he's legit, but his big mistake was that he did not know how deep The Swamp really is.
Which sounds like a convenient excuse, to be sure, but then I think about how I, though I consider myself very knowledgeable, just had no idea about a wide variety of things that have come to reality over the last few years.
Did I think they would front a body double as President or re-elect a dead man as Governor of CA, and be successful? No. Did I imagine they could set off a nuke and convince everyone it was a pile of old fertilizer? No way. Did I think They would try to start WW3 in Europe, and even blow up their big pipeline, and those faggots wouldn't even say a word in their own defense? No, never thought it would be possible. Point is, my imagination is good enough to know that I can't imagine what he or anyone like him is really up against.
In the end, it's like Pascal's Wager. If he's for real, then maybe just maybe he can pull our fat out of the fire. If he's phony and this was all a mind-blowingly elaborate setup, we were already done for long ago. So no downside, as I see it.
Sorry, my knowledge of USA political system design is mostly based on "BrainDead" series, but how exactly he plans to prosecute all mentioned persons? Does he have a solid team who will take over current bureaucrats and that will allow him to do all that? How he plan to replace judges and prosecutors to make it real? How he plan to force House and Senate to allow him to do that?
And what does he think about criminal prosecution of politicians who failed to fulfill their promises that was given to voters?
seems lenient. i am 100% down with executions for those who knowingly pushed a false narrative. those clowns have torn apart our society and killed American Citizens with their lies.
Nah that's that Guatanamo bay is for and never let them come back.
This is all well and good, but why not take the next step? If certain people should be prosecuted, should he not name those whose responsibility it is but who are failing to do so? If he's not going to at least call them out now, would we have any reason to expect he would as President, let alone take action?
"Naming the Jew" seems to be a big deal around here, so it would seem "naming the prosecutor" would be absolutely required.
I agree. I think that's the correct description.
Many would fault me for it, but I'm still a believer in Trump partly due to that. Dig down far enough and you'll find a few researchers saying that he's legit, but his big mistake was that he did not know how deep The Swamp really is.
Which sounds like a convenient excuse, to be sure, but then I think about how I, though I consider myself very knowledgeable, just had no idea about a wide variety of things that have come to reality over the last few years.
Did I think they would front a body double as President or re-elect a dead man as Governor of CA, and be successful? No. Did I imagine they could set off a nuke and convince everyone it was a pile of old fertilizer? No way. Did I think They would try to start WW3 in Europe, and even blow up their big pipeline, and those faggots wouldn't even say a word in their own defense? No, never thought it would be possible. Point is, my imagination is good enough to know that I can't imagine what he or anyone like him is really up against.
In the end, it's like Pascal's Wager. If he's for real, then maybe just maybe he can pull our fat out of the fire. If he's phony and this was all a mind-blowingly elaborate setup, we were already done for long ago. So no downside, as I see it.
Sorry, my knowledge of USA political system design is mostly based on "BrainDead" series, but how exactly he plans to prosecute all mentioned persons? Does he have a solid team who will take over current bureaucrats and that will allow him to do all that? How he plan to replace judges and prosecutors to make it real? How he plan to force House and Senate to allow him to do that?
And what does he think about criminal prosecution of politicians who failed to fulfill their promises that was given to voters?
"sued"?
seems lenient. i am 100% down with executions for those who knowingly pushed a false narrative. those clowns have torn apart our society and killed American Citizens with their lies.
damn! im liking this guy ALOT MORE! wow