Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

16
which one of you did this? (media.scored.co)
posted 2 years ago by nc777 2 years ago by nc777 +17 / -1
14 comments share
14 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (14)
sorted by:
▲ 7 ▼
– Sargons_wifes_kid 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

That dude that always replies with dictionary definitions of words, rather than a coherent post. Can't remember his name.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– glownigger8675309 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

that account is mostly a bot that escaped from r/iam14andthisisdeep.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 2 points 2 years ago +4 / -2

mostly a bot

"less of a human"... an improvement over being called a bot.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler 3 points 2 years ago +4 / -1

u/free-will-of-choice/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 2 years ago +3 / -2

coherent

a) what if the want for coherence (sticking together) tempts one to ignore the need to sustain apartheid aka being partial (life) within whole (inception towards death)?

b) what if coherence (inception towards death) generates incoherence (life) aka different partials within same whole? Wouldn't that allow one the choice to hold onto or let go of things?

dictionary definitions of words

a) does nature offer words or does it offer sound, which allows those within to shape words out of it? What if words cannot define anything that wasn't already there? What if ones consent to words tempts one to ignore the sound that exits before?

b) if PHONETICIANS (from phonics, sound) adapt to sound, then what if those who adapt to definitions aka DEAF-PHONETICIANS are ignoring sound for words?

c) why do dictionary definitions change and why do the many reason about changing definitions, while struggling to keep up with the contradicting changes?

d) what if sound needs to be let go; while words tempt one to want to hold onto them?

Can't remember his name.

a) what if "free-will-of-choice" doesn't represent a suggested name, hence confusing those who want to hold onto suggested words; definitions; brands; idols...spell-craft?

b) does one need to REspond to MEMory, hence contemplating suggested information or does memory need to respond to input, hence adapting to perceivable inspiration?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Sargons_wifes_kid 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

There he is!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– LarrySwinger 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Lel.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Primate98 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

Not me, but look for a fortune cookie that says, "Did you know THREE buildings collapsed in New York on 9/11? Google 'WTC 7'".

Seems a little punchier. And hey, I'm working with a fortune cookie, okay?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– ClamChowder 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Better question is which one of you automates these posts across multiple platforms daily ;)

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Hurts my eyes trying to read it

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 2 years ago +3 / -2

Here's the txt:

SECRET soc. have ties to drugs/riots/terror'm: JFK warn'd of SS. A sign/word/symb. sys. unites SS. It's tied to Saturn, Lord o/t RINGS/time: Audi rgs; CIA/NBC's BIRD; cross(+) w/ rg/fire (Bayer/ KKK); NSA/Harv'd's shield; eye/1/2 face/"TARGET; cube/sq (Dept of ED.); "PYRA'DIA (Paramt); Nazis' black sun; SPIRAL/e/6/9..(Disney). SS/their agents create div'n, cond'n'g us 2b control'd. Clues: NWO-New Age/era..; 'change.' SS/rels merge: Vat/EU/Mafia/FBI's rg of stars-dots/rg kis'g; CHINA/"Islam's CRES.(cr) w/ STAR/ball; bars/lines (EURO/Fox-Cnn); red/oran/bk +..(Crest/Gulf/ Mobl/Z-11/4c); "Hindu's swastika; Malta-dbl +/X (Exxn/Episc.); cup/bwl (grail/sports). SS front 4 a tiny, anc. race call'd Drag'n Kings(royalty's "origin). DK's long skulls-eyes/archit. were find in Peru/ Turkey/Eastr Is..DK's agenda; surveill'ce state; caste sys/eugenics; debt/infla'n..; crime/shoot'gs/ "chronic confus'n(pronouns); food contrl (Cargill); elite's sex'm/ped'philia..Symbs: NRA/CE/BMW/ DD/ed. orgs; RAINBO/arch/gate; lion; heart; wing'd objs; crown; gems; key/com..STONE; arrow; X'd objs (sw'ds); Mt "Zion ("Zen); bell; clock; Tower; Pillr/tree; blu +/..(Pfizr/Ford/Bk). Sign'g uses: colors; touch'g(rg/chin/ear) freq point'g/dbl "/thum up/pinch'g(fingr/cuff) wink'g|rais'g; set signs-fist (soc'm)/HAND-fwd/homs/ok..Opra'/Putin/Judges/Gop-Dem-local leadrs SIGN. Signs date to Sat's 'Goldn Age.' Symbs: snake/S/tongue out..(DaSani); sprout (4c); geom/flower/star/Ems/spin'g-like symbs (Bp/MIL/occult'm/W-M/prayr wheel); fountn; bee; buttrfly; link'd symbs (MC); "maze/wb/ivy/ UN's grid/knt/8..(energy symbs); ark; "lamp-lant'n-illumin8; dart board; brokn/dif len'th rays (Dole); Ltn'g bolt; spark/lite w/ cr/mt/dots(Post); tilt'd/alter'd +..(Chvy/"Dominos/ADM/Y/Jello/Bai/N'cafe); SKULL-BONES (Ger. SS-Yale); shell; *candl/torch.. Resistance grows: DK need disarm'd pop'ns.

I might take it apart later.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ -1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

Why bother.

Being effect (perceiving) within cause (perceivable) implies that inefficiency represents choice of effect to ignore cause. Ignorance bothers self and others.

just stream of consciousness

Consciousness implies awareness of perceivable, hence a reaction within the ongoing flow of inspiration...others suggest information (like text) to tempt one to ignore this.

from a mentally ill person

Person aka "per sonos" implies "by sound", hence not from the mentally ill, but from healthy sound as the ongoing foundation for temporary ill minds within.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy