I'm glad he's bringing it to light but he doesn't offer much in the way of substance.

He paints this picture that this dude groomed a boy for drag, but we don't actually know what he was charged for, or even if the boy in question was the victim (the only mention of victims is that the tranny didn't get caught doing anything with the special needs kids he works with).

Maybe that's just how the information from the courts works but the article was pretty much rage-bating and about two facts related to the headline.

Also, "she".