Studying specs of that satellite, what good is that? It's not like you have the ability to test this equipment in an identical environment, not even anything close to it. The scientific method requires repeatable observations, so we can only go off the word of proven liars like NASA.
Curious, do you think there is really a Tesla orbiting in space?
Try proving scientifically that the moonlanding happened. You will have a hard time with the telemetry data and origional film missing. You can't replicate the moons environment on earth to test equipment such as space suits. All you have is one lunar lander in a museum that has the build quality of a homeless camp. How do you prove definitively that it occured?
I did address it in my first response to you. How can you possibly test anything the satellite is supposedly subjected to in space, here on earth. How can you use the scientific method to prove its capabilities?
So where to they have a vacuum that equals that of space, with various kinds of cosmic radiation, with sunlight that is hundreds of degrees, and shade that is negative hundreds of degrees, and can simulate various gravity on the moon, orbiting the moon, and the acceleration and deceleration the lunar lander would experience?
With satellites, the '3 body problem' proves there is no simulator capable of keeping 3 or more bodies in a perpetual orbit, so how the hell do they keep satellites in orbit around the earth, when you have gravity impacting it from the sun and moon as well? That's 4 bodies not counting anything else in the solar system.
I have a 40 years old vacuum equipment that expirience same temperature range as satellites, from liquid nitrogen to ~300°C. Nothing happened with seals and metals for 40 years. And why it should? Also satellites are not made from cast iron and they do not use bubblegum for seals. There is no rust in space and it is only 1bar pressure difference in the worst case. Many satellites are not even pressurized, so they have no seals at all.
I am sure you have studied the specs of this satellite and have come up with your own calculations why it cannot last in space for 21 years.
Can you please share your documentation?
Well, they admit it is "defunct."
Sure, it's right next to the documentation that's you read to conclude that vaccines were safe and effective.
Studying specs of that satellite, what good is that? It's not like you have the ability to test this equipment in an identical environment, not even anything close to it. The scientific method requires repeatable observations, so we can only go off the word of proven liars like NASA.
Curious, do you think there is really a Tesla orbiting in space?
so what is your statement based on? your feelz?
Try proving scientifically that the moonlanding happened. You will have a hard time with the telemetry data and origional film missing. You can't replicate the moons environment on earth to test equipment such as space suits. All you have is one lunar lander in a museum that has the build quality of a homeless camp. How do you prove definitively that it occured?
I am not taking about the moon landing.
I am talking about a specific claim made about this satellite.
Stay on topic
I did address it in my first response to you. How can you possibly test anything the satellite is supposedly subjected to in space, here on earth. How can you use the scientific method to prove its capabilities?
Be recreating the conditions in a lab.
Is that a trick question or are you truly that ignorant?
So where to they have a vacuum that equals that of space, with various kinds of cosmic radiation, with sunlight that is hundreds of degrees, and shade that is negative hundreds of degrees, and can simulate various gravity on the moon, orbiting the moon, and the acceleration and deceleration the lunar lander would experience?
With satellites, the '3 body problem' proves there is no simulator capable of keeping 3 or more bodies in a perpetual orbit, so how the hell do they keep satellites in orbit around the earth, when you have gravity impacting it from the sun and moon as well? That's 4 bodies not counting anything else in the solar system.
I have a 40 years old vacuum equipment that expirience same temperature range as satellites, from liquid nitrogen to ~300°C. Nothing happened with seals and metals for 40 years. And why it should? Also satellites are not made from cast iron and they do not use bubblegum for seals. There is no rust in space and it is only 1bar pressure difference in the worst case. Many satellites are not even pressurized, so they have no seals at all.
“Now that it’s of legal drinking age, scientists have determined it will order a fake and gay beer called Bud Light at a local bar”