Studying specs of that satellite, what good is that? It's not like you have the ability to test this equipment in an identical environment, not even anything close to it. The scientific method requires repeatable observations, so we can only go off the word of proven liars like NASA.
Curious, do you think there is really a Tesla orbiting in space?
Try proving scientifically that the moonlanding happened. You will have a hard time with the telemetry data and origional film missing. You can't replicate the moons environment on earth to test equipment such as space suits. All you have is one lunar lander in a museum that has the build quality of a homeless camp. How do you prove definitively that it occured?
I did address it in my first response to you. How can you possibly test anything the satellite is supposedly subjected to in space, here on earth. How can you use the scientific method to prove its capabilities?
Studying specs of that satellite, what good is that? It's not like you have the ability to test this equipment in an identical environment, not even anything close to it. The scientific method requires repeatable observations, so we can only go off the word of proven liars like NASA.
Curious, do you think there is really a Tesla orbiting in space?
so what is your statement based on? your feelz?
Try proving scientifically that the moonlanding happened. You will have a hard time with the telemetry data and origional film missing. You can't replicate the moons environment on earth to test equipment such as space suits. All you have is one lunar lander in a museum that has the build quality of a homeless camp. How do you prove definitively that it occured?
I am not taking about the moon landing.
I am talking about a specific claim made about this satellite.
Stay on topic
I did address it in my first response to you. How can you possibly test anything the satellite is supposedly subjected to in space, here on earth. How can you use the scientific method to prove its capabilities?