a) INTER (internal reaction of oneself) ACTION (external oneness acting upon oneself)...other ones suggest oneself to count aka to collect units together, instead of being the partial unit (unus; one).
b) ONLY (single; one along) TWO (one and one together)...it's only oneself who chooses to count other "ones" together as "two", and doing so tempts one to ignore self.
to extract value from another
a) what can life extract from other life, that the process of dying won't take from both?
b) what if one exits (life) in-between insert (inception) and extract (death)?
c) what if suggested values tempts one to ignore being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable)?
d) what if value (process of dying) inserts and extracts evaluation (living)?
seeks weapons against one another
a) what if choosing want (seeking outcome) tempts one to ignore need (adapting to origin)?
b) what if being (growth within loss) implies being "for" sustenance of self; not "against" others?
c) what if the few suggest "weapon of choice" to tempt one to ignore that ones free will of choice represents the only weapon (instrument of offense) within sound?
In other words...reasoning (conflict) about weapons (offense) OF choice tempts one to ignore being choice (defense) within balance (offense), hence in need to defend self from offending wants.
instantly
IN'STANT, adjective [Latin instans, insto.] - "pressing"...what if perceivable inspiration is pressing upon oneself, while suggested information is pulling one from resisting the impressing?
Which still implies one counting each one of them.
yesterday was
Everything was perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it is.
One's self, eh?
a) self implies each partial one expressing whole oneness. Consider self as the sameness within each difference; required for shared intercourse.
b) "one's self" implies ones choice to claim self for oneself, while suggesting other ones ownership over one's self.
never met him
Nature sets itself apart (from whole into each partial)...others suggest one to come together (to meet). Togetherness requires one to choose to hold onto another, while ignoring apartheid...ignorance corrupts comprehension.
the present moment
How could one perceive PRE (before) SENT (transmission)...while being (life) within transmission (inception towards death)? Have you ever experienced anything other than "this moment"?
if the mailman were to show up now, with his self, then I'd almost certainly shoot him dead.
Maybe that's why he always cautiously rings twice?
look out for number one
a) NUMBER (designation of a unit) aka UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one)...hence: "look out for one-one".
b) looking for one tempts one to ignore being one within forward motion, hence one being tempted to ignore resisting that motion when looking for other ones.
if'n you squeeze 'em in a press
Does it seem like the few will ever run out of squeezable masses to press for extraction? Discerning this as oneself would allow one to loosen the squeeze as expression (growth) within impressing (loss).
If want tempts one to hold onto, then need teaches one to let go...most seem to struggle with learning how to teach that to self.
Entrances is just the back-end of exits.
Ones discernment of coming in or going out makes all the difference.
I could probably blanket six or seven whole californias, with my caltrops.
"Stardom is like living in a bubble"...pffffffffffffffff
a square peg being forced into a round hole, the hole is exerting a back-pressure on the peg, and value is the friction that keeps the whole system from breaking loose
...being forced into (inception) a (w)hole (towards death) implies being partial resistance (life), hence the consequence of friction. Utilizing the incoming force (value) to resist (evaluation) sustains broken (partial temporary growth) within loose (whole ongoing loss) a moment longer.
Notice that you evaluate that which keeps, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) lets go of each partial (living)...hence setting one "free" will of choice.
It's all pork barrels and so you open the barrels and eat...
a) everything is already open (perceivable) for everyone (perceiving) within.
b) ones want to open for gain (food) tempts one to ignore need to resist incoming (hunger).
What'd they say; those words: "Now you just let those fellas go or else I'm gonna sit down."
Release (let go) or pressure (sit down)...if living holds onto without releasing, then the process of dying pressures it through.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis."
Real vs fake; easy vs hard; peace vs war...implies being within a conflict of reason, hence with a mind set on conflict. A peaceful man is conjuring war with his outlook.
They won't stop unless they're stopped
All the killings among humans hasn't stopped all the killings among humans...it's one oneself to discern the implications thereof by wielding the weapon of choice.
So what do you do?
Adapt to being done by.
interlopers
Suggested INTERLO'PE, verb - "to run between parties" tempts one (choice) to ignore perceivable momentum (balance) in-between whole (inception towards death) and partial (life).
Others suggest parties (plural) to tempt one to ignore being a part (singular) within whole. A nice sleight of hand would be the lyrics of "get the party started"...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW1dbiD_zDk aka "I'm your operator, you can call anytime...I'll be your connection to the party line" (written from the perspective of the incoming process of dying to those living within).
I would never have ended up anywhere other than there
"there" implies momentum; hence in-between beginning and end..."ending up" distracts one from that, as does "never", and "others" are suggesting them to you. Nature represents ever; sets one apart among others and only communicates momentum, yet its met by ones free will of choice to ignore.
And pointed sticks!
Staying within momentum makes it harder to be pointed at with sticks. Utilizing sticks while being within momentum makes everything else a flowing canvass for the point (and any other part ) of ones sticks...
Remember when that one guy painted that photograph of the soup cans?
a) INTER (internal reaction of oneself) ACTION (external oneness acting upon oneself)...other ones suggest oneself to count aka to collect units together, instead of being the partial unit (unus; one).
b) ONLY (single; one along) TWO (one and one together)...it's only oneself who chooses to count other "ones" together as "two", and doing so tempts one to ignore self.
a) what can life extract from other life, that the process of dying won't take from both?
b) what if one exits (life) in-between insert (inception) and extract (death)?
c) what if suggested values tempts one to ignore being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable)?
d) what if value (process of dying) inserts and extracts evaluation (living)?
a) what if choosing want (seeking outcome) tempts one to ignore need (adapting to origin)?
b) what if being (growth within loss) implies being "for" sustenance of self; not "against" others?
c) what if the few suggest "weapon of choice" to tempt one to ignore that ones free will of choice represents the only weapon (instrument of offense) within sound?
In other words...reasoning (conflict) about weapons (offense) OF choice tempts one to ignore being choice (defense) within balance (offense), hence in need to defend self from offending wants.
IN'STANT, adjective [Latin instans, insto.] - "pressing"...what if perceivable inspiration is pressing upon oneself, while suggested information is pulling one from resisting the impressing?
Which still implies one counting each one of them.
Everything was perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it is.
a) self implies each partial one expressing whole oneness. Consider self as the sameness within each difference; required for shared intercourse.
b) "one's self" implies ones choice to claim self for oneself, while suggesting other ones ownership over one's self.
Nature sets itself apart (from whole into each partial)...others suggest one to come together (to meet). Togetherness requires one to choose to hold onto another, while ignoring apartheid...ignorance corrupts comprehension.
How could one perceive PRE (before) SENT (transmission)...while being (life) within transmission (inception towards death)? Have you ever experienced anything other than "this moment"?
Maybe that's why he always cautiously rings twice?
a) NUMBER (designation of a unit) aka UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one)...hence: "look out for one-one".
b) looking for one tempts one to ignore being one within forward motion, hence one being tempted to ignore resisting that motion when looking for other ones.
Does it seem like the few will ever run out of squeezable masses to press for extraction? Discerning this as oneself would allow one to loosen the squeeze as expression (growth) within impressing (loss).
If want tempts one to hold onto, then need teaches one to let go...most seem to struggle with learning how to teach that to self.
Ones discernment of coming in or going out makes all the difference.
"Stardom is like living in a bubble"...pffffffffffffffff
...being forced into (inception) a (w)hole (towards death) implies being partial resistance (life), hence the consequence of friction. Utilizing the incoming force (value) to resist (evaluation) sustains broken (partial temporary growth) within loose (whole ongoing loss) a moment longer.
Notice that you evaluate that which keeps, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) lets go of each partial (living)...hence setting one "free" will of choice.
a) everything is already open (perceivable) for everyone (perceiving) within.
b) ones want to open for gain (food) tempts one to ignore need to resist incoming (hunger).
Release (let go) or pressure (sit down)...if living holds onto without releasing, then the process of dying pressures it through.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTp-dGNwSEk Worth the price of admission.
Real vs fake; easy vs hard; peace vs war...implies being within a conflict of reason, hence with a mind set on conflict. A peaceful man is conjuring war with his outlook.
All the killings among humans hasn't stopped all the killings among humans...it's one oneself to discern the implications thereof by wielding the weapon of choice.
Adapt to being done by.
Suggested INTERLO'PE, verb - "to run between parties" tempts one (choice) to ignore perceivable momentum (balance) in-between whole (inception towards death) and partial (life).
Others suggest parties (plural) to tempt one to ignore being a part (singular) within whole. A nice sleight of hand would be the lyrics of "get the party started"...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW1dbiD_zDk aka "I'm your operator, you can call anytime...I'll be your connection to the party line" (written from the perspective of the incoming process of dying to those living within).
"there" implies momentum; hence in-between beginning and end..."ending up" distracts one from that, as does "never", and "others" are suggesting them to you. Nature represents ever; sets one apart among others and only communicates momentum, yet its met by ones free will of choice to ignore.
Staying within momentum makes it harder to be pointed at with sticks. Utilizing sticks while being within momentum makes everything else a flowing canvass for the point (and any other part ) of ones sticks...
I wouldn't call Andrew a guy, but his "mother" sure looked like one... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Warhol#/media/File:Julia_Warhola.jpg
Then you back out of your driveway and pfffffffffffffffft...