I remember once Mark Passio said that he thought there should be no prisons. He thought that all the inmates should be released back into their communities as a punishment for allowing them to become adults with such a low level of consciousness.
Now that's pretty extreme and I personally don't think we're ready for that at this point, but I was never able to put my finger on exactly why--in principle--he could be said to be wrong.
inmates should be released back into their communities as a punishment
a) release aka response to LEASE; noun - "demise or letting of lands, tenements or hereditaments to another for life, for a term of years, or at will, for a rent or compensation reserved; also, the contract for such letting".
The few suggest prisons to tempt each one of the many to confine self by shirking response-ability within surrounding onto others. In short...if there's a problem, then others take it away.
b) confining ones mind (confinement) within ones surrounding represents a punished mind (punishment), and since one chooses to do this to oneself, it represents solitary confinement.
c) inmate aka being within + MATE ( associate for propagation)
d) suggested communities aka commune-ism tempts the singular ones to consent to a collectivism (togetherness) suggested by other ones, hence by the chosen ones.
Sleight of hand: "being part (partial) of a community (togetherness)"...a contradiction in terms. One exists as partial (life) within whole (inception towards death)...others suggest togetherness to tempt one to ignore struggling for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
low level of consciousness
Low/High represents the level (balance) for ones conscious choice within...others suggest low vs high (imbalance) to tempt one to ignore that.
I personally don't think we're ready for that at this point
a) being by sound (per sonos; person) implies being ready for everything sound has to offer.
Sleight of hand: READY (inception) SET (life) GO (death)
b) a point implies a suggested outcome; being implies reacting center of enacting surrounding, hence still within motion aka in-between (life) entrance (inception) and outcome (death).
why--in principle--he could be said to be wrong.
a) principle (cause) of reasoning (right vs wrong) represents ones consent to the suggestions of another.
b) principle (cause) of being (effect) implies inherent/internal power of energy aka partial effects within whole cause.
c) perceivable sound represents the principle for each suggested word said within.
d) principle of "could be" represents ones ignorance about that everything "was" before anyone within "came to be".
e) ignoring to be (choice) within need/want (balance), while reasoning (want vs not want) over the suggestions of others, gives those others the power of ones consent to rebrand want vs not want into right vs wrong...hence a suggested rebrand tempting the consenting one deeper into ignorance.
The rebranding of reason (want vs not want) into true vs false; right vs wrong; belief vs disbelief; good vs evil; pro-life vs pro-choice; left-wing vs right-wing; poor vs rich; black vs white; cola vs pepsi; blue vs red; ukraine vs russia; vaxxed vs unvaxxed etc. represents layers upon layers of suggested distractions upon ones willing ignorance of perceivable.
Nature doesn't need to be peeled away in layers; each one within nature can express growth outwards from center, which would establish layers of resistance around the seed of living (growth) within the soil of dying (loss).
Look at the growing layers of an onion and notice that peeling them off without damaging the center, allows center to regrow layers. The few suggest the inversion thereof...piling layers upon the center to repress growth.
I remember once Mark Passio said that he thought there should be no prisons. He thought that all the inmates should be released back into their communities as a punishment for allowing them to become adults with such a low level of consciousness.
Now that's pretty extreme and I personally don't think we're ready for that at this point, but I was never able to put my finger on exactly why--in principle--he could be said to be wrong.
a) release aka response to LEASE; noun - "demise or letting of lands, tenements or hereditaments to another for life, for a term of years, or at will, for a rent or compensation reserved; also, the contract for such letting".
The few suggest prisons to tempt each one of the many to confine self by shirking response-ability within surrounding onto others. In short...if there's a problem, then others take it away.
b) confining ones mind (confinement) within ones surrounding represents a punished mind (punishment), and since one chooses to do this to oneself, it represents solitary confinement.
c) inmate aka being within + MATE ( associate for propagation)
d) suggested communities aka commune-ism tempts the singular ones to consent to a collectivism (togetherness) suggested by other ones, hence by the chosen ones.
Sleight of hand: "being part (partial) of a community (togetherness)"...a contradiction in terms. One exists as partial (life) within whole (inception towards death)...others suggest togetherness to tempt one to ignore struggling for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
Low/High represents the level (balance) for ones conscious choice within...others suggest low vs high (imbalance) to tempt one to ignore that.
a) being by sound (per sonos; person) implies being ready for everything sound has to offer.
Sleight of hand: READY (inception) SET (life) GO (death)
b) a point implies a suggested outcome; being implies reacting center of enacting surrounding, hence still within motion aka in-between (life) entrance (inception) and outcome (death).
a) principle (cause) of reasoning (right vs wrong) represents ones consent to the suggestions of another.
b) principle (cause) of being (effect) implies inherent/internal power of energy aka partial effects within whole cause.
c) perceivable sound represents the principle for each suggested word said within.
d) principle of "could be" represents ones ignorance about that everything "was" before anyone within "came to be".
e) ignoring to be (choice) within need/want (balance), while reasoning (want vs not want) over the suggestions of others, gives those others the power of ones consent to rebrand want vs not want into right vs wrong...hence a suggested rebrand tempting the consenting one deeper into ignorance.
The rebranding of reason (want vs not want) into true vs false; right vs wrong; belief vs disbelief; good vs evil; pro-life vs pro-choice; left-wing vs right-wing; poor vs rich; black vs white; cola vs pepsi; blue vs red; ukraine vs russia; vaxxed vs unvaxxed etc. represents layers upon layers of suggested distractions upon ones willing ignorance of perceivable.
Nature doesn't need to be peeled away in layers; each one within nature can express growth outwards from center, which would establish layers of resistance around the seed of living (growth) within the soil of dying (loss).
Look at the growing layers of an onion and notice that peeling them off without damaging the center, allows center to regrow layers. The few suggest the inversion thereof...piling layers upon the center to repress growth.