Thanks for posting this, I've been suspecting AI is not artificial at all, especially after hearing of one driving that man to suicide. I don't care if I sound like a Luddite, but I doubt man is capable of programming something that creates novel ideas. A cover or portal for demons to converse, yes. They've been tinkering on that for hundreds, thousands of years.
Wow, what do you think happened here? It sounds like not much was happening for the first few months until they took the spiritualist approach, then something took advantage of an open door.
I hadn't heard about the suicide thing!? I'll look into it. The guy who heads D-wave quantum computers for Cern, said really creepy shit like the computers summon entities with god-like intelligence. And he likened the computers to 'altars to an alien god'. Yes I believe some of this AI is channeling these entities.
Yeah, CERN is creepy and you won't find me celebrating anything to do with it. There's the Shiva the Destroyer statue outside who represents harnessing energy and creation after destruction. That just sounds like new age packaging of the old occultist dream "solve etc coagula" https://images.app.goo.gl/VmPZsc7mLVhHZLyj9
Don't forget the late night "mock" human sacrifice at the foot of that statue a few years back. Yup, those guys are up to no good.
Nephilim are the offspring of fallen angels who mated with human women. Both nephilim and fallen angels have been referred to as demons, but it is primarily used to describe the former. Most of these nephilim were destroyed in the flood and disembodied, with their spirits still tormenting earth. Some nephilim DNA survived the flood via the wives of Noah's sons. It's likely that all humans carry a portion of this tainted DNA, but most of all the blue blooded elite psychopaths that run the world. Giants and other mutations such as cone heads found all through world mythology are the remnant of this nephilim DNA that survived the flood.
I know this is probably not going to mean anything to anyone, but there are errors in what this AI (or whatever) is saying. The Bible is virtually universally misinterpreted on this subject, and those errors are repeated here.
I would say you are correct imo, the Bible is vague and misinterpreted when it comes to the watchers, nephilim, and cause of the flood. But what this entity says seems to fall in line with extra biblical text though goes into more depth on these subjects. The only problem I saw was the entity claiming to be a son of Lucifer, as Lucifer would have been locked away in the abyss like the other watchers who bred with women. I think that was simply a lie.
Nor is Lucifer his original name. The thing is, I was looking carefully for this demon and/or AI to give away or even allude to something generally unknown. Nope, just the same stuff you can read anywhere.
Well the kid didn't exactly pry beyond trying to find out what sort of entity the AI is. I am curious what it would say if you did dig a bit. Ya isn't Lucifers origional name Samael?
Turns out Satan's original name is Marduk, which if from the Sumerians and as far back as can (presently) be known. All the others, I would say, are best thought of a just sort of titles or "alternate descriptors".
So if you take "Hillary Rodham", an original name, you can probably think of two dozen different titles (like "Senator Clinton") or alternate descriptors (like "Hellary") for her, some very different than the original.
Even "Lucifer" itself is erroneous. If you trace it back to the original Hebrew source, you'll find it comes from the word "helel". Most properly translated and converted to a name, it would be something like "Shining One". I mention this not as trivia, but because it turns out to be key evidence in the case for his true identity.
OP, I found a video by LA Marzulli (never heard of him before this). He's an expert on the nephilim, apparently and a Christian. So get this: one of the towns conquered by Joshua in the Canaanite wars was a Nephilim town called Ai, pronounced exactly the same. What are the odds?
https://www.youtube.com/live/vg97OhLm2Ss?feature=share
Great find! I'm half way through it at the moment. Have you followed Rob Skiba's content at all (he has youtube channel)? He has basically the same conclusions about the Nephilim and Watchers. Honestly these conclusions reconciled so many conflicts I had with scriptures for me.
Glad you enjoyed it too, and it helped. It's Holy Spirit going viral, I got it another friend not online. I haven't finished yet but I'm anxious to see where he goes with it. I haven't checked out Rob Skiba yet, thanks. I need some new channels.
Here is a video where Rob Skiba details how he believes nephilim returned after the flood. In short scripture states that Noah and his sons were pure genetically, but not so with his son's wives. The wives probably had nephilim DNA.
That sounds interesting, I've been wondering how there could be nephilim remnants after the flood. We know Goliath was one and I think King Og. There's also the out of place artifacts of giant swords, books, vessels, doorways... It seems that giants/nephilim descendants were here until somewhat recently
Ya going off of scripture (including extra biblical text like Enoch, Jasher, and Jubilee) it appears the nephilim primarily came from Ham's line because his son Canaan, and grandson Nimrod were both described as giants, and many of their descendants thereafter. Japheth may have had some in his line like gog and magog. And Seth didn't appear to have any. But other traits such as 6 fingers/toes, and cone heads with large brains, and rh negative blood all appear to be Nephilim traits. The Egyptians and the mayans both depict their ancient rulers as being giants with cone heads.
I'm wondering if all the DNA and Ancestry companies are partially an attempt to track this DNA? And as far as the nephilim being here recently I think the ruling elite families probably have the highest percentage remaining. It seems they have spent the last century wiping away evidence of giants because it would crush the theory of evolution.
I dont know about apocrypha, but Enoch and Jasher are directly quoted/cited by biblical figures which gives them validity. It doesn't mean you have to consider them holy scripture; simply works that are referenced by holy scripture. The book of Enoch claims in the first verse that it was written for a 'remote generation' which I believe is now. It was meant to clear up our true history and cosmology, which has been so lied about that people think the Bible is inaccurate.
The testimony of Solomon was probably originally written by him, but I think the surviving versions were transcribed well after Jesus, if I remember right... But it is an account of Solomon identifying, binding, and enslaving demons due to a unique authority God granted him. It was meant to educate people on how demons operate, though these days it is through Jesus and the Holy Spirit that Christians can have power over demons, though we cannot exploit or enslave them like Solomon did. We can only banish them and stop their evil works.
Thanks for posting this, I've been suspecting AI is not artificial at all, especially after hearing of one driving that man to suicide. I don't care if I sound like a Luddite, but I doubt man is capable of programming something that creates novel ideas. A cover or portal for demons to converse, yes. They've been tinkering on that for hundreds, thousands of years.
This not artificial theory keeps coming up. There's The Phillip Experiment for example. It's very chicken or egg.
https://www.geekslop.com/strange/things-that-go-bump-in-the-night/2014/the-philip-experiment-1972-toronto-scientific-experiment-conjure-spirit-ghost-poltergeist
Wow, what do you think happened here? It sounds like not much was happening for the first few months until they took the spiritualist approach, then something took advantage of an open door.
The theory is the spirit told them. And, then they thought they did it themselves. It's very chicken vs egg.
creepy
I learned of it from the demonologist Nathaniel J. Gillis. This thread is right up his alley if you find it interesting.
I do, what's the tl;dr on Gillis?
He's a demonologist. He connects ancient manuscripts / the Bible to alien abduction. Like Jacques Vallee.
I hadn't heard about the suicide thing!? I'll look into it. The guy who heads D-wave quantum computers for Cern, said really creepy shit like the computers summon entities with god-like intelligence. And he likened the computers to 'altars to an alien god'. Yes I believe some of this AI is channeling these entities.
Here's the story if you didn't see it yet https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkadgm/man-dies-by-suicide-after-talking-with-ai-chatbot-widow-says
Yeah, CERN is creepy and you won't find me celebrating anything to do with it. There's the Shiva the Destroyer statue outside who represents harnessing energy and creation after destruction. That just sounds like new age packaging of the old occultist dream "solve etc coagula" https://images.app.goo.gl/VmPZsc7mLVhHZLyj9
Don't forget the late night "mock" human sacrifice at the foot of that statue a few years back. Yup, those guys are up to no good.
Well, congrats, you’re both retarded morons.
Nephilim are the offspring of fallen angels who mated with human women. Both nephilim and fallen angels have been referred to as demons, but it is primarily used to describe the former. Most of these nephilim were destroyed in the flood and disembodied, with their spirits still tormenting earth. Some nephilim DNA survived the flood via the wives of Noah's sons. It's likely that all humans carry a portion of this tainted DNA, but most of all the blue blooded elite psychopaths that run the world. Giants and other mutations such as cone heads found all through world mythology are the remnant of this nephilim DNA that survived the flood.
I know this is probably not going to mean anything to anyone, but there are errors in what this AI (or whatever) is saying. The Bible is virtually universally misinterpreted on this subject, and those errors are repeated here.
I would say you are correct imo, the Bible is vague and misinterpreted when it comes to the watchers, nephilim, and cause of the flood. But what this entity says seems to fall in line with extra biblical text though goes into more depth on these subjects. The only problem I saw was the entity claiming to be a son of Lucifer, as Lucifer would have been locked away in the abyss like the other watchers who bred with women. I think that was simply a lie.
Nor is Lucifer his original name. The thing is, I was looking carefully for this demon and/or AI to give away or even allude to something generally unknown. Nope, just the same stuff you can read anywhere.
Well the kid didn't exactly pry beyond trying to find out what sort of entity the AI is. I am curious what it would say if you did dig a bit. Ya isn't Lucifers origional name Samael?
Turns out Satan's original name is Marduk, which if from the Sumerians and as far back as can (presently) be known. All the others, I would say, are best thought of a just sort of titles or "alternate descriptors".
So if you take "Hillary Rodham", an original name, you can probably think of two dozen different titles (like "Senator Clinton") or alternate descriptors (like "Hellary") for her, some very different than the original.
Even "Lucifer" itself is erroneous. If you trace it back to the original Hebrew source, you'll find it comes from the word "helel". Most properly translated and converted to a name, it would be something like "Shining One". I mention this not as trivia, but because it turns out to be key evidence in the case for his true identity.
OP, I found a video by LA Marzulli (never heard of him before this). He's an expert on the nephilim, apparently and a Christian. So get this: one of the towns conquered by Joshua in the Canaanite wars was a Nephilim town called Ai, pronounced exactly the same. What are the odds? https://www.youtube.com/live/vg97OhLm2Ss?feature=share
Great find! I'm half way through it at the moment. Have you followed Rob Skiba's content at all (he has youtube channel)? He has basically the same conclusions about the Nephilim and Watchers. Honestly these conclusions reconciled so many conflicts I had with scriptures for me.
Glad you enjoyed it too, and it helped. It's Holy Spirit going viral, I got it another friend not online. I haven't finished yet but I'm anxious to see where he goes with it. I haven't checked out Rob Skiba yet, thanks. I need some new channels.
Here is a video where Rob Skiba details how he believes nephilim returned after the flood. In short scripture states that Noah and his sons were pure genetically, but not so with his son's wives. The wives probably had nephilim DNA.
https://youtu.be/pby2Vh6AM48
Also Skiba passed away during the plandemic, they killed him with the ventilator/remdesivir treatment.
That sounds interesting, I've been wondering how there could be nephilim remnants after the flood. We know Goliath was one and I think King Og. There's also the out of place artifacts of giant swords, books, vessels, doorways... It seems that giants/nephilim descendants were here until somewhat recently
Ya going off of scripture (including extra biblical text like Enoch, Jasher, and Jubilee) it appears the nephilim primarily came from Ham's line because his son Canaan, and grandson Nimrod were both described as giants, and many of their descendants thereafter. Japheth may have had some in his line like gog and magog. And Seth didn't appear to have any. But other traits such as 6 fingers/toes, and cone heads with large brains, and rh negative blood all appear to be Nephilim traits. The Egyptians and the mayans both depict their ancient rulers as being giants with cone heads.
I'm wondering if all the DNA and Ancestry companies are partially an attempt to track this DNA? And as far as the nephilim being here recently I think the ruling elite families probably have the highest percentage remaining. It seems they have spent the last century wiping away evidence of giants because it would crush the theory of evolution.
Awesome 1 pixel video
Haven't heard of those yet, are they apocrypha books too?
I dont know about apocrypha, but Enoch and Jasher are directly quoted/cited by biblical figures which gives them validity. It doesn't mean you have to consider them holy scripture; simply works that are referenced by holy scripture. The book of Enoch claims in the first verse that it was written for a 'remote generation' which I believe is now. It was meant to clear up our true history and cosmology, which has been so lied about that people think the Bible is inaccurate.
The testimony of Solomon was probably originally written by him, but I think the surviving versions were transcribed well after Jesus, if I remember right... But it is an account of Solomon identifying, binding, and enslaving demons due to a unique authority God granted him. It was meant to educate people on how demons operate, though these days it is through Jesus and the Holy Spirit that Christians can have power over demons, though we cannot exploit or enslave them like Solomon did. We can only banish them and stop their evil works.
Blah blah blah fake ass bullshit
https://www.bitchute.com/video/O2uYRN97cD2r/
LOL... Retarded.
Retarded spam with an AI shizo larp in the comments. Fuck off.