Who believes this shit?
(www.bbc.co.uk)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
It hasn't said anything. But it thinks to explain it?
Read article. It uses an example of both Snowden and Manning. They leaked particular access relevant to their framework. They both held specific roles. They weren't national guard either.
Laughably bullshit. It also stresses copied files. No explanation. Except lacks protocol.
When the media is all over this, it's bullshit.
Now it's profiling the leaker. Far right, racist blah blah. Who were Snowden and Manning?
Since both Snowden and Manning. That access has what??? Had more or less access? Since big leaks and counter recruitment has protocol tightened or loosened?
Absurdly bullshit.
SHEEP ... SHEEP BELIEVE WHATEVER THEY ARE TOLD !
I cannot believe the level of journalism there. The BBC undoubtedly uses better protocols. Let's try to find the payslips. It's not uncommon see the audits these can be accessed by thousands of personnel? On what planet.
They really don't. Since Snowden is there more or less trust in even more invasive solutions. Did his warnings use that coverage to adopted them? Facial cams, more tech employing. While stoking that the Chinese are also engaging. 5G, Huawei, tik tok, etc. Until every narrative immediately after was it's the Russians. Censorship, sanctions, restriction. Drones or whatever caused more or less drones, it caused far more. They're even fully automated killer drones now? Those networks all of them, opened to further government protocols and usage. Until Pegasus is a Google App. They put Pegasus in your shopping trolley.
The gullible do what they're told as the policy becomes what agenda.
Who knows what that complete architecture is but it often causes a reverse. It has been designed to cause it.
Not I
Well, it's a real question that you pose. Why indeed? Few pose this question to themselves, and fewer still give any answer other than, "They're sheep!" That simply begs the question, does it not?
I suppose all this is a cordial invitation to everyone to raise their level of consciousness. Unless, of course, you're happy with the way it is.
John Kirby authorised it. It's why it has hit all the reactors and fact checkers. Reverse psychology.
They feed and run psyops. Intel they can blame, causing an adverse reaction, used to convince the gullible to act on.
Strategically planted. It has been happening for decades.
Or tell me the USA has worse protocols than any other basic network?
It was a Minecraft recruitment center? I'll show you mine if you show me yours. Give the little rats some cheese. It might psy out. Or it can be used for wider strategy.
If indeed there is any validity. We still got a bunch of unverified speculation. The cult of leaker, leaks. Who would've concluded? 21 years olds don't, despite their access. Go figure.
Ultimately cross sharing platforms are gonna get the censors.
The pentagon behaves like children.
Doesn't surprise me if they actually are staffed with children.
if someone that is that low in the chain can seriously get vital damaging information out there on a chat program, we have a HUGE security problem in this country.
Oy vey fellow whites shut it down!