Who believes this shit?
(www.bbc.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
It hasn't said anything. But it thinks to explain it?
Read article. It uses an example of both Snowden and Manning. They leaked particular access relevant to their framework. They both held specific roles. They weren't national guard either.
Laughably bullshit. It also stresses copied files. No explanation. Except lacks protocol.
When the media is all over this, it's bullshit.
Now it's profiling the leaker. Far right, racist blah blah. Who were Snowden and Manning?
Since both Snowden and Manning. That access has what??? Had more or less access? Since big leaks and counter recruitment has protocol tightened or loosened?
Absurdly bullshit.