There's a theory floating around that takes the same observations described in the article and accounts for them in a different way. It's one of the most disturbing things I've ever heard and I've never researched it in depth because I don't really like thinking about it, but here it is....
The Anunnaki and their offspring, the Nephilim, were cannibalistic. That is, they ate humans, and humans are genetically part-Anunnaki and part-primate. So many of the old stories of human sacrifice may not have been for strictly ceremonial purposes, or even for consumption of loosh, but for consumption of human flesh.
At some point and in some circumstance of which I do not know, a compromise or substitute was developed. Through genetic engineering, wild hogs were crossed with humans to create domestic pigs. The Anunnaki or Nephilim could eat these freely without people getting upset at all the human sacrifice and cannibalism.
As crazy as this thesis sounds, it precisely addresses two very disparate items:
First, the paper suggest the cross was due to some fucking in the forest by wild pigs and primates. Does that seem even remotely plausible? Not to me. Interestingly, Robert Sepehr has mentioned some hybrid primates that are not much different from either parent species, but are socially rejected by both.
Second, did you ever wonder where the Jews' very strong taboo against pork came from? People wave their hands around about parasites and trichonosis or whatever, but others have been safely consuming pork for a very long time. I'm pretty sure that if there was a safe way to do it, hungry people would find it.
If any of this has put anyone off pork to any extent, I'm staring a club.
I like where your going with this. Personally im starting to think that pig is definitely in our family tree. Maybe not directly our parent but maybe cousin or sister species.
perhaps there was another animal involved that created both pig and human. They say a hybrid animal would take the shape of the mother species, so depending on with species was the female they're could be two different hybrids.
link me that paper if you ever come across it
also iv never looked at the bacon the same since..
I forgot to mention the third strange anomalous data point that plugs into this theory. Apparently human meat is known in certain circles as "long pig", because it smells just like pork while cooking. You can't even make this shit up.
CONSUME, verb - "to destroy, by separating the parts of a thing, by decomposition, as by fire, or eating, devouring, and annihilating the form of a substance"
What if whole (process of dying) separates itself into each partial (living)? What if the process of dying "consumes" the living? What if living represents decomposition, hence being dissolved back into origin?
I theorized it might have universal appeal, so I looked for a long time before I finally ran across someone that hated the smell of bacon cooking. Maybe there are more advanced beings among us who "get it" on a much deeper level?
"The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which." George Orwell, Animal Farm.
Great quote. Just my feeling, but I doubt Orwell actually knew about this. That being said, maybe you gotta chalk up a point for synchromysticism, huh?
exists in the same form until it becomes extinct. He dubbed this lack of change “equilibrium” or “stasis”...
If form (life) implies difference within extincting sameness of flow (inception towards death), then the implied momentum of motion represents the balance (equilibrium) for ones free will of choice, which isn't at standstill (stasis); but at center of surrounding motion.
Ones lack of self discernment about being within the momentum of motion doesn't imply "lack of change"...
There's a theory floating around that takes the same observations described in the article and accounts for them in a different way. It's one of the most disturbing things I've ever heard and I've never researched it in depth because I don't really like thinking about it, but here it is....
The Anunnaki and their offspring, the Nephilim, were cannibalistic. That is, they ate humans, and humans are genetically part-Anunnaki and part-primate. So many of the old stories of human sacrifice may not have been for strictly ceremonial purposes, or even for consumption of loosh, but for consumption of human flesh.
At some point and in some circumstance of which I do not know, a compromise or substitute was developed. Through genetic engineering, wild hogs were crossed with humans to create domestic pigs. The Anunnaki or Nephilim could eat these freely without people getting upset at all the human sacrifice and cannibalism.
As crazy as this thesis sounds, it precisely addresses two very disparate items:
First, the paper suggest the cross was due to some fucking in the forest by wild pigs and primates. Does that seem even remotely plausible? Not to me. Interestingly, Robert Sepehr has mentioned some hybrid primates that are not much different from either parent species, but are socially rejected by both.
Second, did you ever wonder where the Jews' very strong taboo against pork came from? People wave their hands around about parasites and trichonosis or whatever, but others have been safely consuming pork for a very long time. I'm pretty sure that if there was a safe way to do it, hungry people would find it.
If any of this has put anyone off pork to any extent, I'm staring a club.
I like where your going with this. Personally im starting to think that pig is definitely in our family tree. Maybe not directly our parent but maybe cousin or sister species.
perhaps there was another animal involved that created both pig and human. They say a hybrid animal would take the shape of the mother species, so depending on with species was the female they're could be two different hybrids.
link me that paper if you ever come across it
also iv never looked at the bacon the same since..
Lmao go vegan kid
Here's where I first read about the idea: Domestic Pig is hybrid of Human and Wild Boar genetics (6/5/2012)
I forgot to mention the third strange anomalous data point that plugs into this theory. Apparently human meat is known in certain circles as "long pig", because it smells just like pork while cooking. You can't even make this shit up.
What if whole (process of dying) separates itself into each partial (living)? What if the process of dying "consumes" the living? What if living represents decomposition, hence being dissolved back into origin?
Reminds me of the beginning of 2001 A Space Odyssey.
So, bacon is ok, right?
I theorized it might have universal appeal, so I looked for a long time before I finally ran across someone that hated the smell of bacon cooking. Maybe there are more advanced beings among us who "get it" on a much deeper level?
"The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which." George Orwell, Animal Farm.
Great quote. Just my feeling, but I doubt Orwell actually knew about this. That being said, maybe you gotta chalk up a point for synchromysticism, huh?
Yes, I base all my theories on a talk.
If form (life) implies difference within extincting sameness of flow (inception towards death), then the implied momentum of motion represents the balance (equilibrium) for ones free will of choice, which isn't at standstill (stasis); but at center of surrounding motion.
Ones lack of self discernment about being within the momentum of motion doesn't imply "lack of change"...