Another picture of a tweet? You deserve this low quality that you bring in here.
I wish you had the capacity to provide useful posts. Instead, you waterboard some rant and provide a picture of nothing...
I wish you were gone from here, for real. You bring nothing useful to this community but more anger and stupid posts. Sorry, but that's the truth. Up your quality or spam your nonsense. Your choice.
As expected, you focus on popularity. I focus on quality.
Quality is quality even if no one upvotes it. Low quality is low quality even if everyone upvotes it. Does that give you the answer you seek?
You continue to present low quality content and you don't like my reply. You don't focus on the details I've shared, you attack directly = ad hominem. Typical reaction of a child. You don't even see the point that we can work together.
Really? You attack my God? I am not needed to defend my God, my God is a God and compared to any of your delusions of perfect self -> he is so much better than that. You can't attack my faith because I believe in a better being than you have ever been or you would ever dream of. Think about that. God is perfection. You are mediocrity.
I get it tho.. I am not like you... someone, who will just attack the person with petty insults. You are just angry because of a negative criticism. When the anger passes away, you will see my point clearly. Then you will agree. Because we both appreciate better quality of everything. We are in this site to seek quality, wouldn't you agree? Anyway, think about it when you calm down.
a) could one see more underneath the suggestions of others? Could one express growth within self by channeling from underneath whatever others are suggesting?
b) if a picture represents a captured moment, then how could one utilize ongoing momentum?
you deserve
If DESERVE, verb - "to merit; to be worthy of; applied to good or evil", then is there merit outside the good vs evil conflict? What merit does a conflict represent?
low quality that you bring in here
a) what if low vs high represents ones suggestion upon perceivable quality? What about inherent/internal quality before suggestions are made upon it?
b) if life moves from inception toward death; then what brought life into motion? How could anyone within motion bring anything else into it?
I wish you had the capacity
a) what if ones want (wish) for suggested outcomes tempts one to ignore perceivable origin?
b) if reality contains everything within, then how could those within have capacity issues?
a picture of nothing...
Can one capture the moment of nothing, and if nothing is within motion to be captured, then how could it be nothing? What's the origin of nothing...perception or suggestion?
I wish you were gone from here, for real.
If one exists within a balance based system (choice in-between need/want balance), then what happens if one tries to get rid of what one doesn't want? Are 109 attempts to get rid off enough for one to question the consequences...
useful
What if only those (partial) within full (whole) can have the choice to use?
more anger
Sleight of hand: "I'm madly in anger with you...St. Anger around my neck". What if anger represents one choice to strangle self by blaming others for the consequences of ones choices?
that's the truth
What if true (want) vs false (not want) tempts one to ignore change (need)? Can you tell me something that is "truth" which nature doesn't change?
Your choice.
Can a reaction (choice) within enacting (balance) ever be yours?
Another picture of a tweet? You deserve this low quality that you bring in here.
I wish you had the capacity to provide useful posts. Instead, you waterboard some rant and provide a picture of nothing...
I wish you were gone from here, for real. You bring nothing useful to this community but more anger and stupid posts. Sorry, but that's the truth. Up your quality or spam your nonsense. Your choice.
As expected, you focus on popularity. I focus on quality.
Quality is quality even if no one upvotes it. Low quality is low quality even if everyone upvotes it. Does that give you the answer you seek?
You continue to present low quality content and you don't like my reply. You don't focus on the details I've shared, you attack directly = ad hominem. Typical reaction of a child. You don't even see the point that we can work together.
Really? You attack my God? I am not needed to defend my God, my God is a God and compared to any of your delusions of perfect self -> he is so much better than that. You can't attack my faith because I believe in a better being than you have ever been or you would ever dream of. Think about that. God is perfection. You are mediocrity.
I get it tho.. I am not like you... someone, who will just attack the person with petty insults. You are just angry because of a negative criticism. When the anger passes away, you will see my point clearly. Then you will agree. Because we both appreciate better quality of everything. We are in this site to seek quality, wouldn't you agree? Anyway, think about it when you calm down.
a) could one see more underneath the suggestions of others? Could one express growth within self by channeling from underneath whatever others are suggesting?
b) if a picture represents a captured moment, then how could one utilize ongoing momentum?
If DESERVE, verb - "to merit; to be worthy of; applied to good or evil", then is there merit outside the good vs evil conflict? What merit does a conflict represent?
a) what if low vs high represents ones suggestion upon perceivable quality? What about inherent/internal quality before suggestions are made upon it?
b) if life moves from inception toward death; then what brought life into motion? How could anyone within motion bring anything else into it?
a) what if ones want (wish) for suggested outcomes tempts one to ignore perceivable origin?
b) if reality contains everything within, then how could those within have capacity issues?
Can one capture the moment of nothing, and if nothing is within motion to be captured, then how could it be nothing? What's the origin of nothing...perception or suggestion?
If one exists within a balance based system (choice in-between need/want balance), then what happens if one tries to get rid of what one doesn't want? Are 109 attempts to get rid off enough for one to question the consequences...
What if only those (partial) within full (whole) can have the choice to use?
Sleight of hand: "I'm madly in anger with you...St. Anger around my neck". What if anger represents one choice to strangle self by blaming others for the consequences of ones choices?
What if true (want) vs false (not want) tempts one to ignore change (need)? Can you tell me something that is "truth" which nature doesn't change?
Can a reaction (choice) within enacting (balance) ever be yours?