a) consent to suggested information gives those suggesting the power to control (govern) the minds (ment) of those consenting.
b) ignoring perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information) represents the shadow over ones comprehension, while others control (govern) ones mind (ment).
to push the idea
What if suggested idealism tempts one to ignore being (life) pushed (inception towards death), hence having response-ability (choice) to resist perceivable origin instead of following along towards suggested outcomes.
a) what if resisting suggested "we" (pluralism) would allow one to regain control (govern) of ones mind/memory (ment)?
b) what if suggested "need to be" tempts one to ignore perceivable need for being?
c) to be implies "towards being", yet while alive one is being moved from inception towards death, so not towards being, but within loss of being...unless resisted.
we the people
a) who wrote the "we the people" as the preamble of the constitution...the people or those writing in the name of the people?
b) can a few represent a many without each one of the many ignoring to respond to presented as oneself?
c) why do the few remain "apart" while suggesting the many to come "together"?
become corrupted
What if consenting to suggested "be-come" corrupts one from comprehending perceivable "came-to-be"? Become tempts towards outcome; came to be implies out of origin.
Seems like the word Government is more of a conspiracy than the word conspiracy
a) consent to suggested information gives those suggesting the power to control (govern) the minds (ment) of those consenting.
b) ignoring perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information) represents the shadow over ones comprehension, while others control (govern) ones mind (ment).
What if suggested idealism tempts one to ignore being (life) pushed (inception towards death), hence having response-ability (choice) to resist perceivable origin instead of following along towards suggested outcomes.
IT means most people are dumb sheep!
It's the same semitic criminals that have been attempting to enslave the planet for 2000 years.
And there it is! The hate larping.
Another data point.
Yes, and?
We need to be the Gov as a People. We run our own Country instead of hiring employees who have become corrupted.
a) what if resisting suggested "we" (pluralism) would allow one to regain control (govern) of ones mind/memory (ment)?
b) what if suggested "need to be" tempts one to ignore perceivable need for being?
c) to be implies "towards being", yet while alive one is being moved from inception towards death, so not towards being, but within loss of being...unless resisted.
a) who wrote the "we the people" as the preamble of the constitution...the people or those writing in the name of the people?
b) can a few represent a many without each one of the many ignoring to respond to presented as oneself?
c) why do the few remain "apart" while suggesting the many to come "together"?
What if consenting to suggested "be-come" corrupts one from comprehending perceivable "came-to-be"? Become tempts towards outcome; came to be implies out of origin.
Right. You need to use guns for that to become real, though.
Guns are only for defensive purposes.
Enjoy being exterminated, then.
You needed a tweet to figure that one out? Sorry, but you are way too late to the game.