Food corporations like to roll out a relatively normal product at first, with normal ingredients, and when people began to buy it silently replace normal ingredients with chemistry.
Also such things happens when manufacturer tries to keep the same price in times of inflation. Replacing pork and beef in sausages to chicken, shugar with sweeteners, natural juice with artificial flavorings and so on.
If manufacturer is old and had stable quality for years, it is a second case - hiding inflation. There still stocks of normal product in your grocery, but already new batch in town you visited.
If you like that candies, fill your stocks with candies from your town, because very soon they will be replaced with new batches with aspartam.
If I remember correctly, there is a website that supposedly has different vax batches and the injuries reported to them.
If the data is true, then certain batches were deadlier than others, and this is the part I have a hard time believing, but supposedly these "bad batches" were sent to states that were more prominently red, or blue. I cant remember specifically.
Considering that this was a relatively untested technology. They proably tweaked the formulas bit by bit using the reactions as a guide to help them sort it out. ALl the while lying to everyone and telling them the science was settled lol.
Literally the largest mass clinical trial performed on the unsuspecting masses.
If you remember, this was during the ethereum boom when people were finding their medical information in the chain. I still think they had the number crunching networks helping sort the data.
Adverse reaction databases could show that some batches are deadlier than others, but that does not prove that other batches are safer.
There is additional factor that heavily influence the data in such databases - was it allowed to create a records for adverse effects or not.
If different batches had different ingredients and so different outcomes, it is certainly a factor too.
So you have at least two unknown factors that could interfere with results to produce results you observe.
If we suppose that they know which batches are more harmful beforehand, then why they need multiple different batches at all?
And if they need different batches to find out most harmful, they obviously couldn't know beforehand what batch will be more harmful and couldn't administer them accordingly.
I think they didn't know outcomes, all experiment was about finding them, so average distribution of harmful and not so harmful results among the batches is constant, but in some places it was prohibited to even admit officially a possibility of adverse effects while other places post them into database. Obviously different batches was distibuted to different places.
Switching to items people have allergies to is supposed to be clearly labeled. Sugar substitutes are high on the elimination diet ( list of things to cut to find what you're allergic to).
Products at Walmart are different than products at other vendors. Their buyers insist on super cheap versions of things to maintain their profit margins. Compare the SKUs.
Food corporations like to roll out a relatively normal product at first, with normal ingredients, and when people began to buy it silently replace normal ingredients with chemistry.
Also such things happens when manufacturer tries to keep the same price in times of inflation. Replacing pork and beef in sausages to chicken, shugar with sweeteners, natural juice with artificial flavorings and so on.
If manufacturer is old and had stable quality for years, it is a second case - hiding inflation. There still stocks of normal product in your grocery, but already new batch in town you visited.
If you like that candies, fill your stocks with candies from your town, because very soon they will be replaced with new batches with aspartam.
They did it with vaccines too. More based states were hit with worse posion.
Could it be that based states just reported more about injuries and woke states hide numbers of injured?
Good point. I never thought of that or heard of that idea.
If I remember correctly, there is a website that supposedly has different vax batches and the injuries reported to them.
If the data is true, then certain batches were deadlier than others, and this is the part I have a hard time believing, but supposedly these "bad batches" were sent to states that were more prominently red, or blue. I cant remember specifically.
Considering that this was a relatively untested technology. They proably tweaked the formulas bit by bit using the reactions as a guide to help them sort it out. ALl the while lying to everyone and telling them the science was settled lol.
Literally the largest mass clinical trial performed on the unsuspecting masses.
If you remember, this was during the ethereum boom when people were finding their medical information in the chain. I still think they had the number crunching networks helping sort the data.
Article slandering the guy who compiled the data.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/craig-paardekoopers-shady-site-shows-covid-anti-vaxxers-will-believe-anything
Adverse reaction databases could show that some batches are deadlier than others, but that does not prove that other batches are safer.
There is additional factor that heavily influence the data in such databases - was it allowed to create a records for adverse effects or not.
If different batches had different ingredients and so different outcomes, it is certainly a factor too.
So you have at least two unknown factors that could interfere with results to produce results you observe.
If we suppose that they know which batches are more harmful beforehand, then why they need multiple different batches at all?
And if they need different batches to find out most harmful, they obviously couldn't know beforehand what batch will be more harmful and couldn't administer them accordingly.
I think they didn't know outcomes, all experiment was about finding them, so average distribution of harmful and not so harmful results among the batches is constant, but in some places it was prohibited to even admit officially a possibility of adverse effects while other places post them into database. Obviously different batches was distibuted to different places.
Switching to items people have allergies to is supposed to be clearly labeled. Sugar substitutes are high on the elimination diet ( list of things to cut to find what you're allergic to).
Products at Walmart are different than products at other vendors. Their buyers insist on super cheap versions of things to maintain their profit margins. Compare the SKUs.
They did it with vaccines too. More based states were hit with worse posion.
We aren't just sheep but also test subjects. See covid for big example
The hardness could simply be that they were older. I think gummies harden as they age. Might be drying out.