This seems to be the true justification for the terror brought upon the world by the US.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
If you track the history of the world’s “reserve currency” and look into the geopolitical changes that happened at the transition points (and the persons who were the catalysts) as it flowed from one nation to another, it’s like opening the back of a watch to see how everything connects.
Is there any way to live a moral life?
Sure. It requires sacrifices that most don’t want to make, though.
I'm curious
imho, innawoods with minimal
possessionsconveniences not made by one's own hand is about it. still have to be constantly mindful about not causing undue harm to others, though (again, imho; ymmv :)Love and forgiveness. Of self and others.
What if life exists in-between FORWARDS GIVING (inception) and FORWARDS GETTING (death)...hence struggling within what it got, while resisting the temptation of what it gets?
a) MOR'AL, adjective [Latin moralis, moris, manner.] - "form; method; way of performing; custom"...flow (inception towards death) defines the morals of form (life)...unless ignored.
b) consenting to suggested moralism gives those suggesting the power of consent to define; redefine and contradict moral behavior.
In short...moral (perceivable) or immoral (suggested) aka need/want (balance) implies ones free will of choice in-between.
Example: struggling to resist appetite (want) for hunger (need) represents moral; reasoning over hamburger (want) vs cheeseburger (not want) represents immoral...switching sides to cheeseburger (want) vs hamburger (not want) doesn't make falling for the temptation of appetite moral.
Reason (immoral) or Implication (moral)...it's your choice.