When you forget to disable the comments
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
I got banned from patriots.win for talking about verboten WW2 info, not even talking about any specidic demographic, but the hinky stuff about Poland. My comments were removed by mods, so I started my own theead there asking why the mods deleted my comments, since they didnt break any rules. One of the head mods, f-b-i-, tells me I broke 3 specific rules, which I clear didn't, and told him so. He proceeds to tell me I'm brigading (even though I've been a member of that forum since 2016 on Reddit), and that I'm a "stormfag". I press him further on his hypocrisy, and then he says "do you know who I am?", quickly deletes his comment, and then perma bans me.
That mod isn't the only one either. About a week or two ago, I saw a post pinned which mentioned "schlomo" in the title. One of the lower upvoted comments asked why it was pinned, due to the evil antisemitism, to which doggos replied it was a mistake, and they don't tolerate evil antisemitism.
They tolerate people talking negatively about any other demographic, except Jews, even if the information is true. They allow conversation about pretty much anything, except WW2. They're a bunch of hypocrites and liars. It's clearly a false right wing trap, like a lot of normie right wing stuff is nowadays (the Republican party, Fox news, Daily Wire, PragerU, etc.). I've also seen blatant vote manipulation and rampant alt usage.
Unconnected to this, I've also had weird run ins with the mods of c/Christianity. I'm pretty sure two of the mods there (SwampRangers and CuomoisaMassMurderer) are the same person. It started when CuomoisaMassMurderer replied to one of my replies in a random ConPro thread, which was 3 months old. It was weird as hell, considering how this website works. Someone would have to dig for a long time to find that specific thread. A newer ConPro thread had tons more comments by CuomoisaMassMurderer, which made me curious, so I looked through his comment history. It was clear he was shilling the forum, so I posted the info I found in that newer thread. When I did that, SwampRangers comes in, and tries to defend Cuomo, saing he's a genuine user (very odd thing to say), that he frequents ConPro all the time, and other lies. I prove that's not the case, while also continuing the debate with Cuomo in the 3 month old thread. When I post a lengthy reply to Cuomo in the old thread (where SwampRangers had never been in), SwampRangers comes in, almost immediately, and says "TLDR". He forgot to change out his account between replying to me in the newer thread, and replying to me on his alt in the 3 month old thread. This made him extremely pissy, and he then spammed tons of replies at me.
Agreed. For people that were banned off of Reddit from undue and hypocritically applied censorship, they seem to embrace it wholeheartedly here.
It's also a blatant logical fallacy. Espousing for the truthful telling of history doesn't make one an advocate of the side that the truth casts a better light on. For any other historical topic a historian doesn't have to defend himself as being pro-[anything], for merely telling the truth about it, except for WW2. A historian about the Roman empire doesn't mean he's pro Roman empire and anti anyone else. A historian about the American Revolution doesn't make him pro U.S. and anti-British. Just because I believe in the truth about WW2 doesn't make me a "Nazi" or "stormfag". That argument is ridiculous just on the surface.
They're hypocrites.
Post the most racist shit about illegal aliens, muslims, black protesters at BLM, and it's all fair game.
I got tens of thousands of upvotes on TheDonald for talking shit about islam and their pedophile slave owning rapist false prophet.
But for being just a FRACTION as critical against Judaism and Jews, i was warned, posts deleted, warned again, put on probation, banned, unbanned, banned again. The fag-mods over there think they're twitter admins. Fuck 'em.
And of course the rules are not equally applied. No racism basically means no racism against Jews or their zio-cuck white shill MAGAtard supporters. Picture Bannon groveling to jews at ZOA annual event or Trump groveling to jews who helped make him rich in Jew York City.
Also notice how they downvote us, even in c/conspiracies, while not refuting anything we've said. They're weak, have no counterpoints, and they know it. They can only survive in a censorship heavy environment. It won't matter, though. Lies always fail.
Too bad. I like debate and besides some surface level badgering and elbows in the ribs I will engage in a fair civil debate without taking too many cheap shots. For example i gave flat earthers fair consideration.
I am also always open to the possibility that I am actually fucking wrong on a topic or issue or debate. I actually like it when i come to a new revelation and realize something i long held to be true is in fact false, or vice versa. For some, they can't admit that whatever they first thought about anything is wrong because they have too big an ego built upon falsehoods, bad information, misplaced trust, etc.
Absolutely agree. I always try to give people a chance to prove their point, and always consider that I might be wrong about something, in full or in part. I prioritize truth first, above all else, so I can learn. It's the reason why my profile name is what it is. However, I'll always challenge someone's position in a debate, usually through poking holes in their logic, as I hate getting into the back and forth posting of articles that each side tries to dismiss. Almost invariably, it results in people getting vitriolic, they start name calling, and resort to all manner of logically fallacious arguments. It's sad. They treat their opinions like an anchor. They cling to it even if it'll drown them, thinking they have no choice. Everyone has free will and can change their minds. Most refuse to, though, at least at first.
Even people who consider themselves right wing, will use the exact same globalist propaganda and arguments as the far left when you challenge their conditioned assumptions. That's probably why it's more infuriating to debate a normie right winger than a lefty. The right winger already knows the news, media, and government all lie, about everything, but they still cling onto lies they were taught in school, especially about history, or what the "authorities" say on medicine. They fall victim to the same logical fallacies as the left, appeals to emotion, popularity, and authority.
This is why my research into conspiracy theories was so crucial in red pilling me. It opened my eyes to all of this, with how corrupted the world actually is, what the people in power have done, what they've said, and what they're willing to do. I found out who I could trust, and who I couldn't. It wasn't even intentional at first either. I was more interested in stuff like bigfoot, ghosts, and aliens. Instead I learned way more about political and historical conspiracies.
I've also discovered a lot of shills too. Honestly challenging someone, their ideas, and not relenting, is a really good way to find out who a person is. They almost invariably get emotional and let things slip that they normally wouldn't. You can also infer a lot by what people say and how they say it, with just a modicum of experience and understanding of human motivations. I've changed quite a lot of my views over the last 10 years, some subtle, and some major, due to coming across better information and arguments. So I know from experience it's not impossible to change one's mind.