Anon tried to warn about the Scamdemic in 2019.
(media.scored.co)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Wow, this is some serious shit. I keep a list of all the prediction style posts like this. This is one of the better/more accurate/undeniable ones I've seen, to date.
I don't think US deaths have passed 4 million yet, maybe not more than 2 million. But the side effects will kill millions more before 5 years are out.
I suspect there are several factors for why the deathtoll is lower than what could have been predicted. Several things have been effective. VitaminD, ivermectin (and other compounds in the avermectin line such as selemectin which is commonly given to pets to prevent fleas), hydroxychloroquine, Nac + pineapple.
The Rockefeller papers predicted it. Harry Vox used that to predict it.
See thread: https://communities.win/c/NoNewNormal/p/16a9zoeM1X/old-video-interview-from-2014-wh/c
Most Recent Discussion:
Harry Vox's 2014 Pandemic / Lockstep Prediction Video https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16aANFxCYE/harry-voxs-2014-pandemic--lockst/c
Yeah, a lot of people seemed to know what was up. This Crazy Sonofabitch nailed it back in 2016:
https://youtu.be/T7Jl-FgyQjw?t=131 (jump to 2:20 for the first prediction.)
Here is another one from 2019 that was deleted in the US: https://www.bitchute.com/video/qJETktlOtUEC/
I got the coof 12/2019. Was dating a DoD firefighter
The west coast state and the toxic metals part of this are wrong. It seems like a well informed larp
Toxic heavy metals were the problems with previous vaccines. Not the main problem with these. That to me is one reason it seems larpy
Doesn't matter. That's not the problem with the vaccines
When talking to the general public most people refer to excipients as toxic metals (think mercury). These injections seemed to use graphene as the excipient not metal.
Pfizer and most all of the big pharma have early phase research sites in the SF bay area.
Exactly. The poster calls out toxic metals as the excipient which is incorrect and calls out west coast states where it is public knowledge many pharma giants have research facilities. These things to me point more to a well informed larp than insider info because this person was using info that was known at the time not info that points to them having specific knowledge of the situation.
Agreed, that it could go either way. Inconclusive. "a well informed larp" that got lucky is more probable.
Good evening Agent Smith.
Yes, pointing out inaccuracies in a post that someone who was well informed could have fabricated as a larp is definitely some matrix enforcer shit you got me there chief