As soon as he became the possible replacement for Trump, the media is going (softer) on him. But when FL anti-grooming bill was being signed into law, well, they weren't. Expect that as soon has he runs head to head with a Dem, the gloves come off.
It doesn't necessarily improve or burn. There are other options such as the one where Trump, Musk, et all take down the cartoonishly evil cabal by design and though people perceive this development as an improvement it actually leads to greater slavery.
Reasoning over suggested implies "making impure by admixture" (sophistication), hence ignoring pure (perceivable inspiration) for admixture (mingling with another) with impure (suggested information).
Try using implication aka IF (perceiving) THEN (perceivable) instead of reasoning (wanting vs not wanting suggested). Reason always represents a conflict one consents to participate within. Resisting reasoning will show one how others are tempting one to choose a side, while getting more and more agitated if consent isn't given to either side.
Suggested free will tempts one to ignore perceivable free will of choice...if free, then dominated by, if will (want), then within need.
language model
Resonance/dissonance (balance) represents the mold (model) for the instrument of free will of choice within perceivable sound...articulating sound through suggested words tempts one to ignore that, while giving those suggesting the words the consent to mold definitions.
we know
Knowledge (perceivable) implies by each perceiving one, hence the communication of whole (perceivable) towards each partial (perceiving) within. Suggested "we" represents the inversion of perceivable "one". Every one comprehends perceivable differently, unless consenting to follow the same suggestions, hence order following.
know what sophistry is
a) knowledge implies that which was (perceivable), before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is".
b) a sophist represents one who consented to suggested sophism.
c) suggested sophistry (make impure by admixture) represents the inversion of being able to admix (perceiving choice) within pure (perceivable balance).
ambivalent
AMBI (on both sides) represents suggested dualism, which tempts one to ignore perceivable oneness. Inception and death represent the same motion, only for life at the center does it represent both entrance and exit simultaneously. Life needs to discern oneness for self, while others tempt one with suggested dualism into a conflict (reason).
tl; dr...How could inception and death be at conflict with each other? What about left vs right? Whenever one chooses to step left, it implies coming from right and vice versa. One can only exist at the center...never on any side.
fist
Aka e pluribus unum...out of many (digits) one (fist).
As soon as he became the possible replacement for Trump, the media is going (softer) on him. But when FL anti-grooming bill was being signed into law, well, they weren't. Expect that as soon has he runs head to head with a Dem, the gloves come off.
It doesn't necessarily improve or burn. There are other options such as the one where Trump, Musk, et all take down the cartoonishly evil cabal by design and though people perceive this development as an improvement it actually leads to greater slavery.
This
Well stated.
Reasoning over suggested implies "making impure by admixture" (sophistication), hence ignoring pure (perceivable inspiration) for admixture (mingling with another) with impure (suggested information).
Try using implication aka IF (perceiving) THEN (perceivable) instead of reasoning (wanting vs not wanting suggested). Reason always represents a conflict one consents to participate within. Resisting reasoning will show one how others are tempting one to choose a side, while getting more and more agitated if consent isn't given to either side.
Suggested free will tempts one to ignore perceivable free will of choice...if free, then dominated by, if will (want), then within need.
Resonance/dissonance (balance) represents the mold (model) for the instrument of free will of choice within perceivable sound...articulating sound through suggested words tempts one to ignore that, while giving those suggesting the words the consent to mold definitions.
Knowledge (perceivable) implies by each perceiving one, hence the communication of whole (perceivable) towards each partial (perceiving) within. Suggested "we" represents the inversion of perceivable "one". Every one comprehends perceivable differently, unless consenting to follow the same suggestions, hence order following.
a) knowledge implies that which was (perceivable), before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is".
b) a sophist represents one who consented to suggested sophism.
c) suggested sophistry (make impure by admixture) represents the inversion of being able to admix (perceiving choice) within pure (perceivable balance).
AMBI (on both sides) represents suggested dualism, which tempts one to ignore perceivable oneness. Inception and death represent the same motion, only for life at the center does it represent both entrance and exit simultaneously. Life needs to discern oneness for self, while others tempt one with suggested dualism into a conflict (reason).
tl; dr...How could inception and death be at conflict with each other? What about left vs right? Whenever one chooses to step left, it implies coming from right and vice versa. One can only exist at the center...never on any side.
Aka e pluribus unum...out of many (digits) one (fist).