a) consider a seed...it can unfold (evolve) into a tree by its own efforts, yet simultaneously it's being moved from inception towards death, hence corrupted through motion.
b) EVOLVO (unfolding reaction) within -TION (folded action) aka living (unfolding growth) within the process of dying (folding loss).
c) suggested UN (negation) tempts one to consent to ignore CONSCIOUS (awareness), hence ones willing choice to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) representing "unconscious" behavior. One (partial within whole) is always conscious, but has the free will of choice to ignore that.
d) suggested "cannot" aka CAN (being able) NOTHING (negation of everything) represents the inversion of being able (reaction) within everything (action).
e) free will of choice represents reaction within the enacting dominance of balance, hence IN (within) VOLUNTAS (will).
Gurdjieff, Mathers, Blavatsky, Crowley.....these were all requisitioned by the Cabal to gather known materials and re-interpret them to create a new magical system as the old had been 'lost' to time and existed in fragments in many languages.
Tolkien's Fellowship did much the same thing with the subject being historic events and genetic lines.
The Luciferian motto being 'Do what thou WILT', it's all about replacing the Divine Will with one's own personal 'wants or needs' and this is a degradation of the concept...........as planned.
Occultism is Sophomoric philosophy/theology whether they know it or not, as they insist on interpreting the Divine as personal material 'power', as do their rivals and opponents.
This is the anti-thesis of the androgynous christ who exists 'in heaven' as perfection/prototype.
Do the hard work it takes to not be fooled by supposed 'high minded' sophists.
Learn where the symbols come from and magic words will have no effect.
Charming with the 'apple' of material 'knowledge' which is missing an important non-element (spirit, the opposite of Ego as personal 'will')
The books of the Old Testament are testament to this very battle.
Each time the spirit was tainted as 'mammon' (god of physicality)...civilizations suffered, burned and were over-turned with the previous deity as demon.
The luciferian motto didn't exist verbatim in ancient times. But the con-fusion between the personal will and divine has always existed and will usually materialize in some anthropromorphic fashion.
Two are taken up to a high place of understanding.
ONE sees the true source by continually looking for it........the OTHER attempts to create a system of power by it, to fulfill desire and instill fear.......the mind killers.
These are the two on a high place. Not the common 'believer'.
The difference between the 99 and the 1 are too subtle for most, let alone the battle between the warlock and the sage (wizard).
Lucifer is knowledge of the material world and thereby 'rules' it.....until the Trickster's trick is known for what it is.
I'll say it is partly wrong. Will comes from a combination of needs with the mechanisms we create in the mind to achieve goals. These mechanisms dynamically evolve, and are also shaped by environment. For instance, a ghetto kid may have needs but lacks the mind to know how to achieve them. As a result, his will is going to be kind of raw emotional - maybe impulsive - instead of disciplined.
Consciousness can evolve in at least two ways: by conscious determination, but also by unconscious processes that, as they grow, so grow conscious ability.
a) FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of CHOICE (implies within balance).
b) ongoing -ATION (action) allows temporary to COMBINE (reaction) by setting apart from whole (action) into partial (reaction).
c) ones struggle represents apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying), while others tempt with together aka with combinations of ingredients within base (alchemy).
we create
a) create any new thought without shaping out of preexisting input...partial cannot create without transmuting out of whole. Others can tempt perceiving partial with suggested creationism to ignore perceivable whole.
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts the perceiving "one" (singular) to ignore oneself. Mass consent to a suggested plural (we the people) doesn't cancel each individual one within, it just shows mass ignorance, which gives the few "chosen ones" the power to control each one of the consenting many through the suggested plural "we".
If you and me agree to be "we", then you will still be you and me will still be me, yet "we" can now be used by anyone to manipulate both of "us", hence WE the people or US (united states).
to achieve goals
a) If life is being moved from inception towards death, then does the outcome of life represent the wanted goal for living or does life need to resist the origin, which moves it from inception towards death?
b) why do you think freemasonry utilizes the soccer ritual in-between "goals"?
c) GOAL, noun - "the point set to bound a race, and to which they run; the mark" aka being bound to suggested progressivism, chasing whatever others tempt one to gain, while being "marked" by the beast for extinction.
disciplined
The disciple (living) needs to resist the master (process of dying)...not follow others, hence consenting to be domesticated by suggested rules.
a) consider a seed...it can unfold (evolve) into a tree by its own efforts, yet simultaneously it's being moved from inception towards death, hence corrupted through motion.
b) EVOLVO (unfolding reaction) within -TION (folded action) aka living (unfolding growth) within the process of dying (folding loss).
c) suggested UN (negation) tempts one to consent to ignore CONSCIOUS (awareness), hence ones willing choice to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) representing "unconscious" behavior. One (partial within whole) is always conscious, but has the free will of choice to ignore that.
d) suggested "cannot" aka CAN (being able) NOTHING (negation of everything) represents the inversion of being able (reaction) within everything (action).
e) free will of choice represents reaction within the enacting dominance of balance, hence IN (within) VOLUNTAS (will).
Gurdjieff, Mathers, Blavatsky, Crowley.....these were all requisitioned by the Cabal to gather known materials and re-interpret them to create a new magical system as the old had been 'lost' to time and existed in fragments in many languages.
Tolkien's Fellowship did much the same thing with the subject being historic events and genetic lines.
The Luciferian motto being 'Do what thou WILT', it's all about replacing the Divine Will with one's own personal 'wants or needs' and this is a degradation of the concept...........as planned.
Occultism is Sophomoric philosophy/theology whether they know it or not, as they insist on interpreting the Divine as personal material 'power', as do their rivals and opponents.
This is the anti-thesis of the androgynous christ who exists 'in heaven' as perfection/prototype.
Do the hard work it takes to not be fooled by supposed 'high minded' sophists.
Learn where the symbols come from and magic words will have no effect.
Charming with the 'apple' of material 'knowledge' which is missing an important non-element (spirit, the opposite of Ego as personal 'will')
Yes. it is as old as religion.
All casts a shadow in the light of truth.
The books of the Old Testament are testament to this very battle.
Each time the spirit was tainted as 'mammon' (god of physicality)...civilizations suffered, burned and were over-turned with the previous deity as demon.
The luciferian motto didn't exist verbatim in ancient times. But the con-fusion between the personal will and divine has always existed and will usually materialize in some anthropromorphic fashion.
Two are taken up to a high place of understanding.
ONE sees the true source by continually looking for it........the OTHER attempts to create a system of power by it, to fulfill desire and instill fear.......the mind killers.
These are the two on a high place. Not the common 'believer'.
The difference between the 99 and the 1 are too subtle for most, let alone the battle between the warlock and the sage (wizard).
Lucifer is knowledge of the material world and thereby 'rules' it.....until the Trickster's trick is known for what it is.
https://www.scribd.com/document/398575567/230403079-Jesus-Christ-Sun-of-God-Ancient-Cosmology-and-Early-Christian-Symbolism-by-David-R-Fideler-pdf
The 'original' system is the universe as it is, and to know it is to be free from distortion.
Occult explanations distort with purpose and agenda.
I'll say it is partly wrong. Will comes from a combination of needs with the mechanisms we create in the mind to achieve goals. These mechanisms dynamically evolve, and are also shaped by environment. For instance, a ghetto kid may have needs but lacks the mind to know how to achieve them. As a result, his will is going to be kind of raw emotional - maybe impulsive - instead of disciplined.
Consciousness can evolve in at least two ways: by conscious determination, but also by unconscious processes that, as they grow, so grow conscious ability.
a) FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of CHOICE (implies within balance).
b) ongoing -ATION (action) allows temporary to COMBINE (reaction) by setting apart from whole (action) into partial (reaction).
c) ones struggle represents apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying), while others tempt with together aka with combinations of ingredients within base (alchemy).
a) create any new thought without shaping out of preexisting input...partial cannot create without transmuting out of whole. Others can tempt perceiving partial with suggested creationism to ignore perceivable whole.
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts the perceiving "one" (singular) to ignore oneself. Mass consent to a suggested plural (we the people) doesn't cancel each individual one within, it just shows mass ignorance, which gives the few "chosen ones" the power to control each one of the consenting many through the suggested plural "we".
If you and me agree to be "we", then you will still be you and me will still be me, yet "we" can now be used by anyone to manipulate both of "us", hence WE the people or US (united states).
a) If life is being moved from inception towards death, then does the outcome of life represent the wanted goal for living or does life need to resist the origin, which moves it from inception towards death?
b) why do you think freemasonry utilizes the soccer ritual in-between "goals"?
c) GOAL, noun - "the point set to bound a race, and to which they run; the mark" aka being bound to suggested progressivism, chasing whatever others tempt one to gain, while being "marked" by the beast for extinction.
The disciple (living) needs to resist the master (process of dying)...not follow others, hence consenting to be domesticated by suggested rules.