I'll say it is partly wrong. Will comes from a combination of needs with the mechanisms we create in the mind to achieve goals. These mechanisms dynamically evolve, and are also shaped by environment. For instance, a ghetto kid may have needs but lacks the mind to know how to achieve them. As a result, his will is going to be kind of raw emotional - maybe impulsive - instead of disciplined.
Consciousness can evolve in at least two ways: by conscious determination, but also by unconscious processes that, as they grow, so grow conscious ability.
a) FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of CHOICE (implies within balance).
b) ongoing -ATION (action) allows temporary to COMBINE (reaction) by setting apart from whole (action) into partial (reaction).
c) ones struggle represents apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying), while others tempt with together aka with combinations of ingredients within base (alchemy).
we create
a) create any new thought without shaping out of preexisting input...partial cannot create without transmuting out of whole. Others can tempt perceiving partial with suggested creationism to ignore perceivable whole.
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts the perceiving "one" (singular) to ignore oneself. Mass consent to a suggested plural (we the people) doesn't cancel each individual one within, it just shows mass ignorance, which gives the few "chosen ones" the power to control each one of the consenting many through the suggested plural "we".
If you and me agree to be "we", then you will still be you and me will still be me, yet "we" can now be used by anyone to manipulate both of "us", hence WE the people or US (united states).
to achieve goals
a) If life is being moved from inception towards death, then does the outcome of life represent the wanted goal for living or does life need to resist the origin, which moves it from inception towards death?
b) why do you think freemasonry utilizes the soccer ritual in-between "goals"?
c) GOAL, noun - "the point set to bound a race, and to which they run; the mark" aka being bound to suggested progressivism, chasing whatever others tempt one to gain, while being "marked" by the beast for extinction.
disciplined
The disciple (living) needs to resist the master (process of dying)...not follow others, hence consenting to be domesticated by suggested rules.
I'll say it is partly wrong. Will comes from a combination of needs with the mechanisms we create in the mind to achieve goals. These mechanisms dynamically evolve, and are also shaped by environment. For instance, a ghetto kid may have needs but lacks the mind to know how to achieve them. As a result, his will is going to be kind of raw emotional - maybe impulsive - instead of disciplined.
Consciousness can evolve in at least two ways: by conscious determination, but also by unconscious processes that, as they grow, so grow conscious ability.
a) FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of CHOICE (implies within balance).
b) ongoing -ATION (action) allows temporary to COMBINE (reaction) by setting apart from whole (action) into partial (reaction).
c) ones struggle represents apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying), while others tempt with together aka with combinations of ingredients within base (alchemy).
a) create any new thought without shaping out of preexisting input...partial cannot create without transmuting out of whole. Others can tempt perceiving partial with suggested creationism to ignore perceivable whole.
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts the perceiving "one" (singular) to ignore oneself. Mass consent to a suggested plural (we the people) doesn't cancel each individual one within, it just shows mass ignorance, which gives the few "chosen ones" the power to control each one of the consenting many through the suggested plural "we".
If you and me agree to be "we", then you will still be you and me will still be me, yet "we" can now be used by anyone to manipulate both of "us", hence WE the people or US (united states).
a) If life is being moved from inception towards death, then does the outcome of life represent the wanted goal for living or does life need to resist the origin, which moves it from inception towards death?
b) why do you think freemasonry utilizes the soccer ritual in-between "goals"?
c) GOAL, noun - "the point set to bound a race, and to which they run; the mark" aka being bound to suggested progressivism, chasing whatever others tempt one to gain, while being "marked" by the beast for extinction.
The disciple (living) needs to resist the master (process of dying)...not follow others, hence consenting to be domesticated by suggested rules.