I still consider myself Christian. Just struggling with the bible, how it's put together, if it's been manipulated or the message distorted, and how it seemingly pacifies Christians to the point that evil prevails in the lands of Christians.
The inaction of Christian church and the capitulation to evil that Christian churches have shown the last 20 years disgusts me to the point I can no longer attend a Christian church. I'm afraid I'm going to slap someone in bible study who grovels about Jews being our chosen people. So I refrain.
Here you have a black Jamaican saying something similar, only to a target black audience. Basically that praying isn't going to break the chains and bondage. You have to escape yourself or take action yourself to exact change and get real freedom. I also liked what he said about if you are free but another black man is still enslaved then you are still enslaved too. It's a form of brotherhood. A slave who is freed must also break his brothers out of the chains.
This might be a good message. Whites spend lots of time infighting. Perhaps waking others up to the truth is a noble cause after all. I lack the patience to deal much with normies.
What's the difference between "Refuge in the Lord" and Hopium?
Sometimes I catch myself praying to God for something I am capable of obtaining or accomplishing with my own will power and motivation. I do believe God or some higher force saves my ass often and must help me along the way. What I am addressing and I think Mutabaruka is saying is the pacifism and inaction that is caused by hope and prayer.
when most people pray .. they pray to satan... they want things... they want worldly recognition.. etc etc... the rarely pray for something useful
also -- God reveals.. he doesnt grant your prayers... "it is done.." the straight and narrow path to salvation has been set... the wide path to destruction has been followed by many
very few will get into heaven -- i agree with you being a pacifist fag does nothing on this planet.. BUT . its a spiritual battle.. not a physical one...
we are in the "hardtimes make strong men" period.. unfortunately...
also trannies are 1% or less of the population.. because of the media.. people think they have control... but they really dont...
I think technology and innovation and combustible engine and such has created an abundance. The abundance is siphoned and stolen by the elite via fiat currency and inflation and other mechanisms of deceit. Easy times created weak men. We have not truly seen hard times if everyone has full bellies, even if its goyslop.
What's the difference between "Refuge in the Lord" and Hopium?
a) suggested RE (response to) FUGIO (to flee) tempts one to flee from perceivable origin, hence the setup for hopium aka suggested outcomes, which is being directed with fear of perceivable outcome (death).
b) difference (living) within sameness (process of dying) aka partials within whole.
A book represents words bound, which implies those consenting to read to be "spell-bound". Furthermore, ones consent to the suggestions of another represents a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law and b) costs credit (creed; faith, submission, consent), hence c) RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew).
Ones struggle implies as living (growth) within the process of dying (loss)...binding oneself to what others are suggesting makes that struggle considerably worse.
it's been manipulated
a) MANIPULATION (Latin manipulus) - "to manage by mental influence"...ones consent to the suggestions by others gives others the consent to manipulate one.
b) the "it" represents what others are suggesting, ones consent isn't towards "it", but towards those suggesting...the "it" distracts one from the suggesting source, just like suggestion (fiction) distracts one from perception (reality), hence layers upon layers of distraction.
the message distorted
MES'SAGE, noun [Latin missus, mitto, to send.] - "dispatch"...it's perceivable (inception towards death) which dispatches perceiving (life). Each perceiving ONE represents the message within ALL perceivable...not what one suggests to one another as messages.
how it seemingly pacifies
Consent to suggested implies submission of consenting choice to suggesting choice, hence willingly pacifying oneself by ignoring to be free will of choice.
evil prevails
a) consenting (want or not want) to suggested moralism lures one into a good (want) vs evil (not want) conflict of reason over suggested moralism. The trick...both wanting or not wanting suggested tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable.
b) PRE (before) VAIL (cover)...suggested information represents the cover over ones consenting mind, while ignoring what comes before suggested...perceivable inspiration.
inaction
Living within the process of dying implies one to be reaction (growth) within enacting (loss). Suggested inaction tempts one to ignore perceivable IN (within) ACTION (hence reacting to being enacted upon).
jews being our chosen
a) if one chooses to consent to the suggested choice of another, then the other becomes the "chosen one".
b) if a ME ignores self, then only for a YOU (phonetic jew).
Sleight of hand from DE (of) LA (the) SOUL (spirit)..."What I do ain't make-believe...People say I sit and try...But when it comes to being De La...It's just me myself and I"
to escape yourself
a) "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka perceiving within perceivable is available at every moment of existence to everyone within.
b) consenting to suggested information implies willingly confining oneself to mentally upheld information, shaped by the suggestions of others. That's the "open" cell one ignores to step out of aka Plato's allegory of the cave.
c) the few suggest escapism to tempt the many to seek suggested liberty from being chained as the inversion of perceivable FREE (life) within DOM (inception towards death).
Recent example...consent to suggested BLOCK (burden) CHAIN (confinement) CRYPTO (death) to set yourself free.
form of brotherhood
Flow (inception towards death) represents the revealing of form (life)...others suggest one to come under the hood (concealment) of collectivism (brothers and sisters united).
The hood always represents ignorance over comprehension, and consenting to it allows others to ROB (to plunder) IN (within) HOOD (ignorance).
infighting
Reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested represents the foundation for every conflict within perceivable. Choice implies being within balance (need/want), hence not within conflict. Choosing to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) is what's being exploited by others with suggestions to reason over.
I still consider myself Christian. Just struggling with the bible, how it's put together, if it's been manipulated or the message distorted, and how it seemingly pacifies Christians to the point that evil prevails in the lands of Christians.
The inaction of Christian church and the capitulation to evil that Christian churches have shown the last 20 years disgusts me to the point I can no longer attend a Christian church. I'm afraid I'm going to slap someone in bible study who grovels about Jews being our chosen people. So I refrain.
Here you have a black Jamaican saying something similar, only to a target black audience. Basically that praying isn't going to break the chains and bondage. You have to escape yourself or take action yourself to exact change and get real freedom. I also liked what he said about if you are free but another black man is still enslaved then you are still enslaved too. It's a form of brotherhood. A slave who is freed must also break his brothers out of the chains.
This might be a good message. Whites spend lots of time infighting. Perhaps waking others up to the truth is a noble cause after all. I lack the patience to deal much with normies.
rule of the bible..
"It is better to take refuge in the Lord than to trust in man." - Pslam 118:8
What's the difference between "Refuge in the Lord" and Hopium?
Sometimes I catch myself praying to God for something I am capable of obtaining or accomplishing with my own will power and motivation. I do believe God or some higher force saves my ass often and must help me along the way. What I am addressing and I think Mutabaruka is saying is the pacifism and inaction that is caused by hope and prayer.
The Bob Marley songs says GET UP! STAND UP! STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLYOOezs3DA
It doesn't say hum and pray and hope. Get off your ass! Go impale a tranny today!
"good people are far and few between"
when most people pray .. they pray to satan... they want things... they want worldly recognition.. etc etc... the rarely pray for something useful
also -- God reveals.. he doesnt grant your prayers... "it is done.." the straight and narrow path to salvation has been set... the wide path to destruction has been followed by many
very few will get into heaven -- i agree with you being a pacifist fag does nothing on this planet.. BUT . its a spiritual battle.. not a physical one...
we are in the "hardtimes make strong men" period.. unfortunately...
also trannies are 1% or less of the population.. because of the media.. people think they have control... but they really dont...
I disagree with the hard times part.
I think technology and innovation and combustible engine and such has created an abundance. The abundance is siphoned and stolen by the elite via fiat currency and inflation and other mechanisms of deceit. Easy times created weak men. We have not truly seen hard times if everyone has full bellies, even if its goyslop.
a) suggested RE (response to) FUGIO (to flee) tempts one to flee from perceivable origin, hence the setup for hopium aka suggested outcomes, which is being directed with fear of perceivable outcome (death).
b) difference (living) within sameness (process of dying) aka partials within whole.
Consider each one to represent "CHRIST-I-AN" aka AN, adjective [Latin unus, una, unum] - "One" ( https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/an )
A book represents words bound, which implies those consenting to read to be "spell-bound". Furthermore, ones consent to the suggestions of another represents a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law and b) costs credit (creed; faith, submission, consent), hence c) RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew).
Ones struggle implies as living (growth) within the process of dying (loss)...binding oneself to what others are suggesting makes that struggle considerably worse.
a) MANIPULATION (Latin manipulus) - "to manage by mental influence"...ones consent to the suggestions by others gives others the consent to manipulate one.
b) the "it" represents what others are suggesting, ones consent isn't towards "it", but towards those suggesting...the "it" distracts one from the suggesting source, just like suggestion (fiction) distracts one from perception (reality), hence layers upon layers of distraction.
MES'SAGE, noun [Latin missus, mitto, to send.] - "dispatch"...it's perceivable (inception towards death) which dispatches perceiving (life). Each perceiving ONE represents the message within ALL perceivable...not what one suggests to one another as messages.
Consent to suggested implies submission of consenting choice to suggesting choice, hence willingly pacifying oneself by ignoring to be free will of choice.
a) consenting (want or not want) to suggested moralism lures one into a good (want) vs evil (not want) conflict of reason over suggested moralism. The trick...both wanting or not wanting suggested tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable.
b) PRE (before) VAIL (cover)...suggested information represents the cover over ones consenting mind, while ignoring what comes before suggested...perceivable inspiration.
Living within the process of dying implies one to be reaction (growth) within enacting (loss). Suggested inaction tempts one to ignore perceivable IN (within) ACTION (hence reacting to being enacted upon).
a) if one chooses to consent to the suggested choice of another, then the other becomes the "chosen one".
b) if a ME ignores self, then only for a YOU (phonetic jew).
Sleight of hand from DE (of) LA (the) SOUL (spirit)..."What I do ain't make-believe...People say I sit and try...But when it comes to being De La...It's just me myself and I"
a) "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka perceiving within perceivable is available at every moment of existence to everyone within.
b) consenting to suggested information implies willingly confining oneself to mentally upheld information, shaped by the suggestions of others. That's the "open" cell one ignores to step out of aka Plato's allegory of the cave.
c) the few suggest escapism to tempt the many to seek suggested liberty from being chained as the inversion of perceivable FREE (life) within DOM (inception towards death).
Recent example...consent to suggested BLOCK (burden) CHAIN (confinement) CRYPTO (death) to set yourself free.
Flow (inception towards death) represents the revealing of form (life)...others suggest one to come under the hood (concealment) of collectivism (brothers and sisters united).
The hood always represents ignorance over comprehension, and consenting to it allows others to ROB (to plunder) IN (within) HOOD (ignorance).
Reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested represents the foundation for every conflict within perceivable. Choice implies being within balance (need/want), hence not within conflict. Choosing to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) is what's being exploited by others with suggestions to reason over.