a) words cannot DEFINE, verb [Latin To end, to limit, from finis, end.] since the perceivable sound, all suggested words are shaped out of, is still going on.
b) PHOENICIANS (from phonics, sound) adapt to perceivable sound, while those who consent to suggested def-initions represent DEAF PHOENICIANS.
archon
'ARCHON, noun [Greek; a prince.] + PRINCE, noun [Latin princeps.] - "a sovereign". Within a balance based system...each ones free will of choice represents a sovereign.
From a difference perspective...the highest (supreme, sovereign) within all value (perceivable) represents each ones evaluation (perceiving) thereof. The lowest and the highest point within balance represents ones choice at the center.
ARCH...the space (momentum) in-between (life) a bridge (inception towards death) when arced (growth within loss).
ON...place in contact (process of dying) with the surface (living)
ON (ongoing process of dying) generates TEMP (temporary living).
So by definition, a definition is a deaf phoenician
a) Notice your use of "by" and "is"...if you are "by" your mother, then you cannot define what your mother "is", because she "was" before you can shape any suggestions about what she "is".
b) Suggestion cannot define what "is", because perceivable "was" before any suggestion about it can be shaped out of it.
c) Notice that I use "represents" over "is", which implies RE (response to) PRESENT (presented by) aka each perceiving ones response to perceivable origin...not to the suggestions by one another.
d) Try humming, next continue humming, while shaping words out of the humming sound. This represents incantation aka adaptation to ongoing, while shaping temporary out of it. Next notice how others respond to this...the sound will distract them from the words, because they're domesticated to respond to suggested words, while ignoring perceivable sound. Doing this will agitate them, will make it harder for them to ignore the sound underneath the words, will weaken their ignorance of ongoing for temporary.
The ongoing (process of dying) unnerves the temporary (living); which in return inspires adaptation for growth of temporary within ongoing loss.
c) deaf phonetician (definition) represents the use of phonetics as both a sleight of hand for those who have ears to hear and mockery of those who willingly choose to ignore sound for words. Same shit is done with symbolism above symmetry, numerology above the designation of different units (ones), words upon sound (spell-craft) and even rhetoric; revisionism and contradiction upon words upon sound etc. Layers of deception; propagated by suggestion towards consent.
or is it the other way around?
a) One way (inception towards death) for everyone within (living). Others imply one living among other ones, while being moved from inception toward death. The way represents velocity (process of dying), which generates momentum, within which resistance (living) can exist.
In short...one perceivable way, endless suggested ways by other ones...your choice to discern reality (perceivable) from fiction (suggested). The allegory of signing a contract with the devil at the crossroads represents one falling for the temptation to consent to the suggested ways by others.
b) Choice can only exist within balance (need/want), hence "living on the edge"...choosing want over need, tempts one into a want vs not want conflict (reasoning).
c) OR, a termination of Latin nouns - "It denotes an agent, as in actor, creditor"...aka ones consent (credit; creed; belief) to the suggested options (optio; wishes; desires) by others. Nature doesn't suggest nouns (names)...it terminates any suggested noun, while tempting those holding onto them down the drain.
It's AGENT (process of dying) generating REGENT (living)...any suggested OR tempts one to ignore that. It's on each ones free will of choice to control self by steering the vessel aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death) through using the OR (phonetic; oar). The few suggest DOCTORS (phonetic; docked oars) to tempt the many to shirk response-ability onto others.
If words can't define, you would counter your own attempts?
a) Ones temptation (attempt) represents reasoning (counter) over the suggested information by others.
b) I take the idolatry; revisionism and contradictions of suggested words apart, while expressing my comprehension of perceivable sound. For me this represents adaptation to perceivable inspiration and reverse engineering of suggested information. The more I reverse engineer information, the more I free my mind/memory for use of inspiration.
Inspiration implies adaptation to ongoing; information implies holding onto temporary.
c) nature sets itself apart aka from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living)...it designates units (Latin; unity; unitas; unus, one). Others tempt one to ignore this by suggesting to count aka to collect units together.
Take anything counted as "two" and notice that you being able to discern between each "one" of them implies differentiation of ones, not sameness of two. It's the suggested label "two" which tricks "one" to ignore oneness (perceivable) and oneself (perceiving).
Like words, all literal/exoteric transliterations of esoteric subjects have their limits.
a) Perceivable sound limits suggestible words. Perceivable balance limits the perceiving choice to shape suggestions. Exoteric (process of dying) represents the limit for esoteric (living) expressions within.
b) Words are suggested to tempt "one" to think "like" other ones, hence mass consensus to suggested definitions. Meanwhile, each "one" implies a different partial (perceiving) within the same whole (perceivable).
Life represents one struggle for apartheid within wholeness, while others tempt one with suggested togetherness to behave "alike" aka e pluribus unum (one out of many) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united states; united nations; european union, uniformity or equality (same) through diversity (difference).
c) Only within limit (balance) can one be free will of choice.
gnosticism
GNOS'TIC, noun [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
The suggested -ism tempts one to consent to those suggesting it, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable. Therefore...Gnosticism represents the inversion of Gnostic. One doesn't need to define perceivable...one needs to adapt to perceivable aka to inspiration (moving differences) aka to a predefined reality which communicates itself as whole (perceivable) to each partial (perceiving)...even when ignored for suggestions by one another.
The linked explanation
The (the-ism) linked (suggested) explanation (definition)...tempts one to ignore being EX (expression of living) within PLAIN (impressing process of dying). In other words...life being moved from inception towards death represents ones "PLAIN of EXistence".
Furthermore...-ATION (action) requires ones self discernment about being reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying). Others can only shape their explanations by reacting to -ATION (action). One cannot suggest a word without shaping it out of perceivable sound...but others can tempt one to ignore perceivable for suggested.
earlier concept
Thinking represents the subject to objectifying input. One is being subjected to thinking, because ones mind was objectified for the subjective role of thinking. Both coexist within the same origin, hence subjection (living) within objection (process of dying), both in balance (momentum of motion) with each other.
The process of dying represents the "earlier" state, while living within represents the "recent" state. Perceivable (reality) will always represent earlier than suggested (fiction)...
All seeming to hinge upon the definition of this word 'Archons'.
a) words cannot DEFINE, verb [Latin To end, to limit, from finis, end.] since the perceivable sound, all suggested words are shaped out of, is still going on.
b) PHOENICIANS (from phonics, sound) adapt to perceivable sound, while those who consent to suggested def-initions represent DEAF PHOENICIANS.
'ARCHON, noun [Greek; a prince.] + PRINCE, noun [Latin princeps.] - "a sovereign". Within a balance based system...each ones free will of choice represents a sovereign.
From a difference perspective...the highest (supreme, sovereign) within all value (perceivable) represents each ones evaluation (perceiving) thereof. The lowest and the highest point within balance represents ones choice at the center.
ON (ongoing process of dying) generates TEMP (temporary living).
So by definition, a definition is a deaf phoenician, or is it the other way around?
If words can't define, you would counter your own attempts? :)
Like words, all literal/exoteric transliterations of esoteric subjects have their limits.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archon_(Gnosticism)
The linked explanation is no exception (exoteric as esoteric) though it comes closer to the earlier concept.
a) Notice your use of "by" and "is"...if you are "by" your mother, then you cannot define what your mother "is", because she "was" before you can shape any suggestions about what she "is".
b) Suggestion cannot define what "is", because perceivable "was" before any suggestion about it can be shaped out of it.
c) Notice that I use "represents" over "is", which implies RE (response to) PRESENT (presented by) aka each perceiving ones response to perceivable origin...not to the suggestions by one another.
d) Try humming, next continue humming, while shaping words out of the humming sound. This represents incantation aka adaptation to ongoing, while shaping temporary out of it. Next notice how others respond to this...the sound will distract them from the words, because they're domesticated to respond to suggested words, while ignoring perceivable sound. Doing this will agitate them, will make it harder for them to ignore the sound underneath the words, will weaken their ignorance of ongoing for temporary.
The ongoing (process of dying) unnerves the temporary (living); which in return inspires adaptation for growth of temporary within ongoing loss.
c) deaf phonetician (definition) represents the use of phonetics as both a sleight of hand for those who have ears to hear and mockery of those who willingly choose to ignore sound for words. Same shit is done with symbolism above symmetry, numerology above the designation of different units (ones), words upon sound (spell-craft) and even rhetoric; revisionism and contradiction upon words upon sound etc. Layers of deception; propagated by suggestion towards consent.
a) One way (inception towards death) for everyone within (living). Others imply one living among other ones, while being moved from inception toward death. The way represents velocity (process of dying), which generates momentum, within which resistance (living) can exist.
In short...one perceivable way, endless suggested ways by other ones...your choice to discern reality (perceivable) from fiction (suggested). The allegory of signing a contract with the devil at the crossroads represents one falling for the temptation to consent to the suggested ways by others.
b) Choice can only exist within balance (need/want), hence "living on the edge"...choosing want over need, tempts one into a want vs not want conflict (reasoning).
c) OR, a termination of Latin nouns - "It denotes an agent, as in actor, creditor"...aka ones consent (credit; creed; belief) to the suggested options (optio; wishes; desires) by others. Nature doesn't suggest nouns (names)...it terminates any suggested noun, while tempting those holding onto them down the drain.
It's AGENT (process of dying) generating REGENT (living)...any suggested OR tempts one to ignore that. It's on each ones free will of choice to control self by steering the vessel aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death) through using the OR (phonetic; oar). The few suggest DOCTORS (phonetic; docked oars) to tempt the many to shirk response-ability onto others.
a) Ones temptation (attempt) represents reasoning (counter) over the suggested information by others.
b) I take the idolatry; revisionism and contradictions of suggested words apart, while expressing my comprehension of perceivable sound. For me this represents adaptation to perceivable inspiration and reverse engineering of suggested information. The more I reverse engineer information, the more I free my mind/memory for use of inspiration.
Inspiration implies adaptation to ongoing; information implies holding onto temporary.
c) nature sets itself apart aka from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living)...it designates units (Latin; unity; unitas; unus, one). Others tempt one to ignore this by suggesting to count aka to collect units together.
Take anything counted as "two" and notice that you being able to discern between each "one" of them implies differentiation of ones, not sameness of two. It's the suggested label "two" which tricks "one" to ignore oneness (perceivable) and oneself (perceiving).
a) Perceivable sound limits suggestible words. Perceivable balance limits the perceiving choice to shape suggestions. Exoteric (process of dying) represents the limit for esoteric (living) expressions within.
b) Words are suggested to tempt "one" to think "like" other ones, hence mass consensus to suggested definitions. Meanwhile, each "one" implies a different partial (perceiving) within the same whole (perceivable).
Life represents one struggle for apartheid within wholeness, while others tempt one with suggested togetherness to behave "alike" aka e pluribus unum (one out of many) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united states; united nations; european union, uniformity or equality (same) through diversity (difference).
c) Only within limit (balance) can one be free will of choice.
The suggested -ism tempts one to consent to those suggesting it, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable. Therefore...Gnosticism represents the inversion of Gnostic. One doesn't need to define perceivable...one needs to adapt to perceivable aka to inspiration (moving differences) aka to a predefined reality which communicates itself as whole (perceivable) to each partial (perceiving)...even when ignored for suggestions by one another.
The (the-ism) linked (suggested) explanation (definition)...tempts one to ignore being EX (expression of living) within PLAIN (impressing process of dying). In other words...life being moved from inception towards death represents ones "PLAIN of EXistence".
Furthermore...-ATION (action) requires ones self discernment about being reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying). Others can only shape their explanations by reacting to -ATION (action). One cannot suggest a word without shaping it out of perceivable sound...but others can tempt one to ignore perceivable for suggested.
Thinking represents the subject to objectifying input. One is being subjected to thinking, because ones mind was objectified for the subjective role of thinking. Both coexist within the same origin, hence subjection (living) within objection (process of dying), both in balance (momentum of motion) with each other.
The process of dying represents the "earlier" state, while living within represents the "recent" state. Perceivable (reality) will always represent earlier than suggested (fiction)...
Word
Where is the full video? I'm curious to watch the whole thing
Ah ok. Happily waiting
Yes. I too watch South Park.