I see here quite often, lengthy discussions on how Putin is out maneuvering this, NATO doing this or that blunder, how China is to be blamed for that and how is Iran going to fight back with their latest drones etc...
The world of geopolitics is indeed interesting, and certainly there must be some genuine competition at that level. But seriously, if you believe Putin is independent and really fighting the Ukrainians or NATO, how do you explain he went along and vaccinated his people? How do you explain all the jewish oligarchs in Russia?
How do you explain Iran going full steam ahead with the covid hoax and vaccinating everyone? How do you explain their masonic parliament building?
God's enemy is those who have free will. The Canaanites and Phoenicians told us so.
The canaanites and Phoenicians worshipped false gods (demons), so they are no different than today's rulers; they have advanced knowledge, technology, power, but they are ultimately deceived. Same with all the lucifarians in Hollywood and politics.
Besides angels and fallen Angels do have free will, that's why God punishes and sometimes even imprisons them. The only difference with them is they can't be redeemed by Jesus sacrifice like humans can. They were created far superior to humans in knowledge, wisdom, and power, so they don't have the same grace we do.
However God has allowed most fallen Angels to go on doing evil for the same reason he allows humans to do so. Everyone will face judgement at some point.
This is just my interpretation of scripture.
a) free will of choice implies as reaction by each ONE (singular)...suggested "those" (plural) tempts one to ignore that.
b) FREE implies within dominance; WILL (want) implies within need; OF implies out of and CHOICE implies within balance.
c) why would others suggest "free will" without "of choice"? Could it be that one can be tricked by choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to bind oneself to the choices of others, while ignoring ones own free will of choice?
What if those who adapt to perceivable sound (phonics) represent PHONETICIANS, while those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words, hence for the "definitions" suggested by others, represent DEAF PHOENICIANS?
CANAAN; from KANA - "to be brought into synchronicity"... https://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Canaan.html
The few suggest synchronism aka e pluribus unum (out of many, one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) to tempt each one of the many to ignore being asynchronous (temporary growth) within synchronous (ongoing loss) aka living within the process of dying, as partial struggling to sustain self within whole.
The many consenting to follow the suggested orders of the few...each ignore being the resistance (life) within the natural order (inception toward death).
Synchrony (temporary chaos) within Asynchrony (ongoing order) aka living within the process of dying.